ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?
Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Graphs
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-04-14
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-23)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-14)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-10-14)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-10)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
- status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
- RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-09-11)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-09-08)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-09-07)
- Fwd: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-09-07)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-09-06)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-08-21)
- Re: issue with today's minutes (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-08-21)
- issue with today's minutes (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-08-21)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-19)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from eric@w3.org on 2013-07-17)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2013-07-16)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-07-15)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-15)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-07-11)
- rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-11)
- Solve ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 by referring to SPARQL 1.1 Service description (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2012-09-10)
- [GRAPH] RDF WG Issues Relating to the Graph TF (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-10-10)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com on 2011-04-16)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-16)
- ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-14)
Related notes:
Resolution at Oct 2012 F2F:
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 saying we're not going to do these in a REC, but might something like this in a WG NOTE ←
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-29#resolution_10
Display change log