ISSUE-38: What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?

graph-vocabulary

What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDF Graphs
Raised by:
Antoine Zimmermann
Opened on:
2011-04-15
Description:
If it is possible to assert statements about g-*, then we may need some additional vocabulary such as a class rdf:Graph and possibly relations between them such as graph imports, subgraph, equivalent graph, etc. and maybe a property that relates an instance of rdf:Graph to its content.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-23)
  2. Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-14)
  3. Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-14)
  4. Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-10-14)
  5. Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-11)
  6. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-11)
  7. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-11)
  8. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-10)
  9. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
  10. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
  11. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
  12. status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
  13. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
  14. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
  15. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
  16. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-08)
  17. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-08)
  18. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-08)
  19. RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-08)
  20. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-08)
  21. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-08)
  22. Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-07)
  23. owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-11)
  24. Solve ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 by referring to SPARQL 1.1 Service description (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2012-09-10)
  25. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2012-01-12)
  26. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
  27. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-11)
  28. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
  29. Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-01-11)
  30. Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com on 2011-04-16)
  31. Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-16)
  32. RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-15)

Related notes:

Resolution at Oct 2012 F2F:

RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 saying we're not going to do these in a REC, but might something like this in a WG NOTE ←

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-29#resolution_10

Guus Schreiber, 8 Oct 2013, 13:24:44

Display change log ATOM feed


Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Chair, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 38.html,v 1.1 2014-07-09 12:18:00 carine Exp $