13:59:26 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-gld-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-gld-irc ←
13:59:32 <PhilA> zakim, this is gld
Phil Archer: zakim, this is gld ←
13:59:33 <Zakim> ok, PhilA; that matches T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, PhilA; that matches T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM ←
13:59:48 <PhilA> zakim, code?
Phil Archer: zakim, code? ←
13:59:48 <Zakim> the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA ←
14:00:10 <HadleyBeeman> cheers, philA
Hadley Beeman: cheers, philA ←
14:00:14 <HadleyBeeman> Sorry to be missing you, olyerickson
Hadley Beeman: Sorry to be missing you, olyerickson ←
14:00:24 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:00:28 <PhilA> zakim, ipcaller is me
Phil Archer: zakim, ipcaller is me ←
14:00:28 <Zakim> +PhilA; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +PhilA; got it ←
14:00:31 <olyerickson> sorry to, but need to provide moral support ;)
John Erickson: sorry to, but need to provide moral support ;) ←
14:01:39 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
14:01:47 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←
14:02:02 <TallTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←
14:02:02 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
14:02:05 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
14:02:05 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
14:02:22 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:02:22 <TallTed> TallTed has changed the topic to: Gov't Linked Data WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130404
Ted Thibodeau: TallTed has changed the topic to: Gov't Linked Data WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130404 ←
14:03:18 <sandro> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Sandro Hawke: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:03:18 <Zakim> On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, PhilA, Sandro, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, PhilA, Sandro, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds ←
14:04:21 <sandro> scribe: sandro
(Scribe set to Sandro Hawke)
14:04:31 <sandro> RRSAgent, pointer?
RRSAgent, pointer? ←
14:04:31 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-gld-irc#T14-04-31
RRSAgent IRC Bot: See http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-gld-irc#T14-04-31 ←
14:05:00 <sandro> trackbot, start meeting
trackbot, start meeting ←
14:05:02 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
14:05:04 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GLD
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be GLD ←
14:05:04 <Zakim> ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started ←
14:05:05 <trackbot> Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference
14:05:05 <trackbot> Date: 04 April 2013
14:05:58 <HadleyBeeman> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-28
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-28 ←
14:06:00 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:06:29 <sandro> proposed: accept http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-28 as minutes of last week
PROPOSED: accept http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-28 as minutes of last week ←
14:06:35 <PhilA> +1
Phil Archer: +1 ←
14:06:39 <DaveReynolds> +1
Dave Reynolds: +1 ←
14:06:43 <james> +1
James McKinney: +1 ←
14:06:44 <sandro> +1
+1 ←
14:06:49 <MakxDekkers> +1
Makx Dekkers: +1 ←
14:06:52 <sandro> resolved: accept http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-28 as minutes of last week
RESOLVED: accept http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-28 as minutes of last week ←
14:07:21 <TallTed> HadleyBeeman's connection is dicey, yes
Ted Thibodeau: HadleyBeeman's connection is dicey, yes ←
14:07:40 <sandro> topic: adms
14:07:58 <sandro> phil: Trying to upload it to hg as we speak. come back to me in 5 mins?
Phil Archer: Trying to upload it to hg as we speak. come back to me in 5 mins? ←
14:08:20 <sandro> topic: Incoming comments on LC documents
14:08:23 <MakxDekkers> have problems connecting voice, local problem it seems, will keep trying
Makx Dekkers: have problems connecting voice, local problem it seems, will keep trying ←
14:08:37 <HadleyBeeman> Comments mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/
Hadley Beeman: Comments mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/ ←
14:08:43 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: we've been trying to generate interest and get review comments. not sure it's sufficient yet.
Hadley Beeman: we've been trying to generate interest and get review comments. not sure it's sufficient yet. ←
14:08:56 <sandro> .. looking mostly at March and April
.. looking mostly at March and April ←
14:09:10 <sandro> .. we have some on PROV and ORG, resolved
.. we have some on PROV and ORG, resolved ←
14:09:20 <sandro> .. cube and dcat are a concern
.. cube and dcat are a concern ←
14:09:22 <MakxDekkers> have asked members of DCAT application profile group in Europe to send comments
Makx Dekkers: have asked members of DCAT application profile group in Europe to send comments ←
14:09:25 <sandro> .. anything at all on cube?
.. anything at all on cube? ←
14:09:44 <sandro> DaveReynolds: There was one comment, editorial, which I responded to.
Dave Reynolds: There was one comment, editorial, which I responded to. ←
14:10:01 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: We're supposed to close LC next week
Hadley Beeman: We're supposed to close LC next week ←
14:10:31 <MakxDekkers> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/description
Makx Dekkers: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/description ←
14:11:27 <Zakim> +MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: +MakxDekkers ←
14:11:29 <sandro> sandro: Can we at least get the statistics people who were in the group, Dan Gilman, and the Australian person & get them to review it.
Sandro Hawke: Can we at least get the statistics people who were in the group, Dan Gilman, and the Australian person & get them to review it. ←
14:12:32 <sandro> sandro: we want evidence of wide public review
Sandro Hawke: we want evidence of wide public review ←
14:12:53 <sandro> DaveReynolds: Yeah, they've been around for several years, so not a lot of comments right now.
Dave Reynolds: Yeah, they've been around for several years, so not a lot of comments right now. ←
14:13:39 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: any proxy for comments?
Hadley Beeman: any proxy for comments? ←
14:14:05 <sandro> sandro: evidence of use, and the fact that we did announce it to these lists, .... that's something.
Sandro Hawke: evidence of use, and the fact that we did announce it to these lists, .... that's something. ←
14:14:47 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: So maybe the discussion has already happened
Hadley Beeman: So maybe the discussion has already happened ←
14:15:11 <sandro> sandro: It's still be good to get a few more emails from people saying they've looked at it, and at least "seems okay to me"
Sandro Hawke: It's still be good to get a few more emails from people saying they've looked at it, and at least "seems okay to me" ←
14:15:33 <MakxDekkers> I will again send a message to the DCAT-AP working group list (over 40 people discussiong using DCAT)
Makx Dekkers: I will again send a message to the DCAT-AP working group list (over 40 people discussiong using DCAT) ←
14:15:49 <sandro> DaveReynolds: Okay, sounds like I should ping the statistics list and Dan
Dave Reynolds: Okay, sounds like I should ping the statistics list and Dan ←
14:16:06 <sandro> thanks, MakxDekkers
thanks, MakxDekkers ←
14:16:37 <DaveReynolds> action: DaveReynolds contact Dan Gilman and PublishingStatistics list to encourage LC responses on Data Cube
ACTION: DaveReynolds contact Dan Gilman and PublishingStatistics list to encourage LC responses on Data Cube ←
14:16:37 <trackbot> Error finding 'DaveReynolds'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/users>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Error finding 'DaveReynolds'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/users>. ←
14:16:59 <sandro> sandro: I suggest provocative deadline-oriented emails. One More Week!
Sandro Hawke: I suggest provocative deadline-oriented emails. One More Week! ←
14:17:24 <sandro> action: dave contact Dan Gilman and PublishingStatistics list to encourage LC responses on Data Cube
ACTION: dave contact Dan Gilman and PublishingStatistics list to encourage LC responses on Data Cube ←
14:17:24 <trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - contact Dan Gilman and PublishingStatistics list to encourage LC responses on Data Cube [on Dave Reynolds - due 2013-04-11].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-107 - contact Dan Gilman and PublishingStatistics list to encourage LC responses on Data Cube [on Dave Reynolds - due 2013-04-11]. ←
14:17:29 <DaveReynolds> We have had quite a lot of comments on DCAT over last few days
Dave Reynolds: We have had quite a lot of comments on DCAT over last few days ←
14:18:03 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:18:09 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Everyone else, PLEASE try to find other people who might care and could review these documents
Hadley Beeman: Everyone else, PLEASE try to find other people who might care and could review these documents ←
14:18:12 <MariosMeimaris> zakim, IPcaller is me
Marios Meimaris: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
14:18:12 <Zakim> +MariosMeimaris; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MariosMeimaris; got it ←
14:18:27 <PhilA> topic: ADMS
14:18:29 <PhilA> http://philarcher.org/adms/
Phil Archer: http://philarcher.org/adms/ ←
14:18:29 <sandro> topic: ADMS
14:18:52 <sandro> PhilA: Forgive me to the non w3.org address for now; I'll put it in mercurial when I can
Phil Archer: Forgive me to the non w3.org address for now; I'll put it in mercurial when I can ←
14:19:21 <sandro> .. I hope I've simplified ADMS quite significantly, applying what I've seen in discussions about org and dcat
.. I hope I've simplified ADMS quite significantly, applying what I've seen in discussions about org and dcat ←
14:19:29 <sandro> .. I've removed RADION references
.. I've removed RADION references ←
14:19:40 <sandro> .. look at diagram.
.. look at diagram. ←
14:20:00 <sandro> .. 6. The ADMS Domain Model
.. 6. The ADMS Domain Model ←
14:20:20 <sandro> PhilA: Was using rdfs:label, .... not we're using dcterms: title
Phil Archer: Was using rdfs:label, .... not we're using dcterms: title ←
14:20:34 <sandro> .. now using skos:altLabel
.. now using skos:altLabel ←
14:20:46 <sandro> .. accessURL, landingPage, etc.
.. accessURL, landingPage, etc. ←
14:20:58 <sandro> .. where there's something in dcat, ADMS now just uses it.
.. where there's something in dcat, ADMS now just uses it. ←
14:21:35 <sandro> .. was originally XML or RDF, still true, but we're ignoring XML for this now. So diagram can be simpler/clearer.
.. was originally XML or RDF, still true, but we're ignoring XML for this now. So diagram can be simpler/clearer. ←
14:21:46 <sandro> .. I suggest this goes through as a WG NOTE.
.. I suggest this goes through as a WG NOTE. ←
14:22:09 <sandro> .. extensive use, but all for one application (EC's own platform)
.. extensive use, but all for one application (EC's own platform) ←
14:22:20 <sandro> q+
q+ ←
14:22:38 <sandro> .. some ADMS-only terms, they are in ADMS namespace. Almost everything is in DC or DCAT.
.. some ADMS-only terms, they are in ADMS namespace. Almost everything is in DC or DCAT. ←
14:23:02 <sandro> sandro: Have your changes been reflected in the implementation?
Sandro Hawke: Have your changes been reflected in the implementation? ←
14:23:09 <DaveReynolds> q+
Dave Reynolds: q+ ←
14:23:20 <sandro> PhilA: MakxDekkers and I are working with the relevant people, so this should be easy enough.
Phil Archer: MakxDekkers and I are working with the relevant people, so this should be easy enough. ←
14:23:39 <sandro> .. This will be the first time ADMS has occured in TR space
.. This will be the first time ADMS has occured in TR space ←
14:23:47 <sandro> sandro: You don't expect pushback over these changes?
Sandro Hawke: You don't expect pushback over these changes? ←
14:24:19 <sandro> MakxDekkers: The tools maintaining ADMS, with OpenRefine, ... No, I don't expect a lot of pushback. We should share this ASAP.
Makx Dekkers: The tools maintaining ADMS, with OpenRefine, ... No, I don't expect a lot of pushback. We should share this ASAP. ←
14:24:37 <PhilA> ack sandro
Phil Archer: ack sandro ←
14:24:38 <sandro> .. with the right explanations, I *expect* people will like the alignment with DCAT.
.. with the right explanations, I *expect* people will like the alignment with DCAT. ←
14:24:55 <sandro> sandro: So is the plan to get that buyin before or after NOTE?
Sandro Hawke: So is the plan to get that buyin before or after NOTE? ←
14:25:19 <sandro> PhilA: We should have feedback before we meet next week, so yes, buying first.
Phil Archer: We should have feedback before we meet next week, so yes, buying first. ←
14:25:19 <PhilA> ack DaveReynolds
Phil Archer: ack DaveReynolds ←
14:25:46 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Okay with voting at F2F?
Hadley Beeman: Okay with voting at F2F? ←
14:26:19 <sandro> PhilA: If there's space on the agenda at the F2F, let's do it then, yes. We'll have a polycom.
Phil Archer: If there's space on the agenda at the F2F, let's do it then, yes. We'll have a polycom. ←
14:27:09 <sandro> sandro: If it's not too much of a hassle, please try to have the major decisions later in the day, for those of us in the western hemisphere.
Sandro Hawke: If it's not too much of a hassle, please try to have the major decisions later in the day, for those of us in the western hemisphere. ←
14:27:26 <sandro> DaveReynolds: For the classes, is there any more you say, eg about SemanticAssets
Dave Reynolds: For the classes, is there any more you say, eg about SemanticAssets ←
14:27:47 <sandro> PhilA: I'd like to make them subclasses of the DCAT classes, but MakxDekkers is telling me why that might not work.
Phil Archer: I'd like to make them subclasses of the DCAT classes, but MakxDekkers is telling me why that might not work. ←
14:27:58 <sandro> PhilA: I think of this as a profile of dcat
Phil Archer: I think of this as a profile of dcat ←
14:29:20 <sandro> MakxDekkers: I haven't thought about whether it's a dcat profile. I see that DCAT was a perspective of a catalog, it describes a virtual file store, where files are distributions, where some share charactrtistics, making a dataset. Instead ADMS focusses on the assets, like the datasets, that can exist WITHOUT a catalog, and without the files.
Makx Dekkers: I haven't thought about whether it's a dcat profile. I see that DCAT was a perspective of a catalog, it describes a virtual file store, where files are distributions, where some share charactrtistics, making a dataset. Instead ADMS focusses on the assets, like the datasets, that can exist WITHOUT a catalog, and without the files. ←
14:29:48 <sandro> .. So ADMS handles assets that are not necessarily in a catalog, and do not necessarily have distributions associated with them
.. So ADMS handles assets that are not necessarily in a catalog, and do not necessarily have distributions associated with them ←
14:30:01 <sandro> .. and that doesn't seem to align with dcat
.. and that doesn't seem to align with dcat ←
14:30:20 <HadleyBeeman> scribe: hadleybeeman
(Scribe set to Hadley Beeman)
14:30:49 <HadleyBeeman> phila: I did try… we're not 100% sure where to go. Def of DCAT dataset is so broad, it's almost the same as RDF resource.
Phil Archer: I did try… we're not 100% sure where to go. Def of DCAT dataset is so broad, it's almost the same as RDF resource. ←
14:31:46 <HadleyBeeman> phila: You may have a semantic asset that exists conceptually, but doesn't have a downloadable form. Example: future deliverables from a working group's charter.
Phil Archer: You may have a semantic asset that exists conceptually, but doesn't have a downloadable form. Example: future deliverables from a working group's charter. ←
14:32:23 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: Not sure I agree. Notion of a dataset as an abstract thing seems reasonable. If ADMS asset isn't a subset of DCAT dataset, then you have a problem.
Dave Reynolds: Not sure I agree. Notion of a dataset as an abstract thing seems reasonable. If ADMS asset isn't a subset of DCAT dataset, then you have a problem. ←
14:33:06 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: The notion of a repository vs the notion of a catalogue may be sufficiently distinct to not be able to relate those two. But I see DCAT as being pretty generic.
Dave Reynolds: The notion of a repository vs the notion of a catalogue may be sufficiently distinct to not be able to relate those two. But I see DCAT as being pretty generic. ←
14:33:13 <MakxDekkers> q+
Makx Dekkers: q+ ←
14:33:29 <sandro> (back)
Sandro Hawke: (back) ←
14:33:36 <sandro> scribe: sandro
(Scribe set to Sandro Hawke)
14:33:37 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA: I would find it easier to make assertions directily about DCAT; I didn't because i didn't want to not take on board what MaksDekkers was saying
Phil Archer: I would find it easier to make assertions directily about DCAT; I didn't because i didn't want to not take on board what MaksDekkers was saying [ Scribe Assist by Hadley Beeman ] ←
14:34:11 <sandro> phil: I think it would be simpler for us as a group if we could say ADMS was a profile of DCAT. If we can do that.....
Phil Archer: I think it would be simpler for us as a group if we could say ADMS was a profile of DCAT. If we can do that..... ←
14:34:17 <PhilA> ack MakxDekkers
Phil Archer: ack MakxDekkers ←
14:35:26 <sandro> MakxDekkers: I find those arguments quite compelling. If we see adms:asset as a subclass ... my objjections were maybe on the theoretical side. I prefer asset as subclass of dataset, with the understanding that dcat dataset is fairly broad -- so it doesn't have to be part of a catalog, and have distributions.
Makx Dekkers: I find those arguments quite compelling. If we see adms:asset as a subclass ... my objjections were maybe on the theoretical side. I prefer asset as subclass of dataset, with the understanding that dcat dataset is fairly broad -- so it doesn't have to be part of a catalog, and have distributions. ←
14:35:30 <DaveReynolds> q+
Dave Reynolds: q+ ←
14:36:09 <sandro> sandro: Maybe MakxDekkers should check the dcat spec to see whether it allows this reading?
Sandro Hawke: Maybe MakxDekkers should check the dcat spec to see whether it allows this reading? ←
14:36:17 <PhilA> definition of dcat:Dataset "This class represents the actual dataset as published by the dataset publisher. In cases where a distinction between the actual dataset and its entry in the catalog is necessary (because metadata such as modification date and maintainer might differ), the catalog record class can be used for the latter."
Phil Archer: definition of dcat:Dataset "This class represents the actual dataset as published by the dataset publisher. In cases where a distinction between the actual dataset and its entry in the catalog is necessary (because metadata such as modification date and maintainer might differ), the catalog record class can be used for the latter." ←
14:36:18 <sandro> MakxDekkers: It wasn't clear, when I read it.
Makx Dekkers: It wasn't clear, when I read it. ←
14:36:34 <sandro> MakxDekkers: ... so in that case it can be a subclass
Makx Dekkers: ... so in that case it can be a subclass ←
14:36:35 <sandro> q?
q? ←
14:36:46 <DaveReynolds> ack me
Dave Reynolds: ack me ←
14:36:47 <PhilA> ack DaveReynolds
Phil Archer: ack DaveReynolds ←
14:37:39 <sandro> DaveReynolds: Can you put this on the list as a question for the dcat editors/users -- making clear that a dcat: dataset can exist without a catalog ? And if so, then we can take ADMS this way. And if so, can we update the documentation?
Dave Reynolds: Can you put this on the list as a question for the dcat editors/users -- making clear that a dcat: dataset can exist without a catalog ? And if so, then we can take ADMS this way. And if so, can we update the documentation? ←
14:38:11 <sandro> sandro: comments list or WG list? WG list is probably easier.
Sandro Hawke: comments list or WG list? WG list is probably easier. ←
14:38:37 <sandro> DaveReynolds: If we end up wanting to change it, we should track that as a last call comment.
Dave Reynolds: If we end up wanting to change it, we should track that as a last call comment. ←
14:38:51 <sandro> PhilA: Sounds good.
Phil Archer: Sounds good. ←
14:39:42 <sandro> action: Makx to raise on the mailing list the question of whether dcat:Dataset can exist without a catalog (and thus adms:Asset can be a subclass of it), and how to clarify this in the text
ACTION: Makx to raise on the mailing list the question of whether dcat:Dataset can exist without a catalog (and thus adms:Asset can be a subclass of it), and how to clarify this in the text ←
14:39:42 <trackbot> Created ACTION-108 - Raise on the mailing list the question of whether dcat:Dataset can exist without a catalog (and thus adms:Asset can be a subclass of it), and how to clarify this in the text [on Makx Dekkers - due 2013-04-11].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-108 - Raise on the mailing list the question of whether dcat:Dataset can exist without a catalog (and thus adms:Asset can be a subclass of it), and how to clarify this in the text [on Makx Dekkers - due 2013-04-11]. ←
14:40:04 <sandro> PhilA: While we haven't talked about ADMS a lot, the work of the group has overall helped ADMS, I think,
Phil Archer: While we haven't talked about ADMS a lot, the work of the group has overall helped ADMS, I think, ←
14:40:32 <sandro> sandro: Do we have WG reviewers assigned for ADMS?
Sandro Hawke: Do we have WG reviewers assigned for ADMS? ←
14:41:06 <sandro> PhilA: I'd hope Richard and/or Fadi could do it, maybe James?
Phil Archer: I'd hope Richard and/or Fadi could do it, maybe James? ←
14:41:28 <sandro> action: james to review ADMS
ACTION: james to review ADMS ←
14:41:28 <trackbot> Created ACTION-109 - Review ADMS [on James McKinney - due 2013-04-11].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-109 - Review ADMS [on James McKinney - due 2013-04-11]. ←
14:42:01 <sandro> topic: status of WG NOTEs ?
14:42:13 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: But Fadi and Benedikt are not on the call
Hadley Beeman: But Fadi and Benedikt are not on the call ←
14:42:47 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Looks like things are roughly on track
Hadley Beeman: Looks like things are roughly on track ←
14:43:00 <sandro> subtopic: regorg
14:43:01 <HadleyBeeman> RegORG timetable: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/REGORG_Timetable
Hadley Beeman: RegORG timetable: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/REGORG_Timetable ←
14:43:24 <sandro> PhilA: No comments yet. But I'll check in on Chris Taggert and see if he'll update OpenCorporates
Phil Archer: No comments yet. But I'll check in on Chris Taggert and see if he'll update OpenCorporates ←
14:43:44 <sandro> .. then we can republish it as a NOTE, with some credibility
.. then we can republish it as a NOTE, with some credibility ←
14:43:57 <sandro> .. with it being used by the biggest db of corps
.. with it being used by the biggest db of corps ←
14:44:15 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Do you want to identify reviewers now or wait?
Hadley Beeman: Do you want to identify reviewers now or wait? ←
14:44:42 <DaveReynolds> My previous review comments should be traceable from the email list
Dave Reynolds: My previous review comments should be traceable from the email list ←
14:44:43 <sandro> PhilA: I think DaveReynolds has reviewed it. It had the FPWD review, and it hasn't changed since then.
Phil Archer: I think DaveReynolds has reviewed it. It had the FPWD review, and it hasn't changed since then. ←
14:45:02 <sandro> PhilA: Unless some problem shows up, it should be simple enough.
Phil Archer: Unless some problem shows up, it should be simple enough. ←
14:45:27 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Perfect.
Hadley Beeman: Perfect. ←
14:45:54 <sandro> topic: Action Review
14:46:59 <sandro> issue-14?
14:46:59 <trackbot> ISSUE-14 -- add dcat:permanentIdentifier property -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-14 -- add dcat:permanentIdentifier property -- open ←
14:46:59 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/14
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/14 ←
14:47:12 <sandro> DaveReynolds: This we decided to postpone
Dave Reynolds: This we decided to postpone ←
14:47:27 <sandro> issue-32?
14:47:27 <trackbot> ISSUE-32 -- Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements? -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-32 -- Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements? -- open ←
14:47:27 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/32
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/32 ←
14:47:44 <sandro> DaveReynolds: That's going to be handled in the Cube UCR
Dave Reynolds: That's going to be handled in the Cube UCR ←
14:47:51 <sandro> issue-41?
14:47:51 <trackbot> ISSUE-41 -- use of skos:altLabel or dcterms:alternative -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-41 -- use of skos:altLabel or dcterms:alternative -- open ←
14:47:51 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/41
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/41 ←
14:48:01 <sandro> PhilA: I don't actually have a problem with this.
Phil Archer: I don't actually have a problem with this. ←
14:48:28 <sandro> PhilA: I'm happy for that to be closed, and turned into an action.
Phil Archer: I'm happy for that to be closed, and turned into an action. ←
14:48:49 <sandro> sandro: and issue-32 could also be turned into an action
Sandro Hawke: and ISSUE-32 could also be turned into an action ←
14:49:18 <sandro> DaveReynolds: it might already be one.
Dave Reynolds: it might already be one. ←
14:49:30 <PhilA> action: PhilA to amend RegOrg to use skaos altLabel cf. dcterms alternative
ACTION: PhilA to amend RegOrg to use skaos altLabel cf. dcterms alternative ←
14:49:30 <trackbot> Created ACTION-110 - Amend RegOrg to use skaos altLabel cf. dcterms alternative [on Phil Archer - due 2013-04-11].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-110 - Amend RegOrg to use skaos altLabel cf. dcterms alternative [on Phil Archer - due 2013-04-11]. ←
14:49:35 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Okay, I'll ping Fadi on closing 14.
Hadley Beeman: Okay, I'll ping Fadi on closing 14. ←
14:49:40 <PhilA> close issue-41
Phil Archer: close ISSUE-41 ←
14:49:40 <trackbot> Closed ISSUE-41 use of skos:altLabel or dcterms:alternative.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Closed ISSUE-41 use of skos:altLabel or dcterms:alternative. ←
14:50:12 <HadleyBeeman> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised ←
14:50:55 <sandro> DaveReynolds: I'm updating tracker for issue-32 to have it be closed
Dave Reynolds: I'm updating tracker for ISSUE-32 to have it be closed ←
14:51:10 <sandro> subtopic: raised issues
14:51:13 <Zakim> -MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: -MakxDekkers ←
14:51:24 <sandro> issue-6?
14:51:24 <trackbot> ISSUE-6 -- How should publishers figure out good URIs for properties with non-literal ranges? -- raised
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-6 -- How should publishers figure out good URIs for properties with non-literal ranges? -- raised ←
14:51:24 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/6
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/6 ←
14:51:39 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: We'll wait for Bernadette
Hadley Beeman: We'll wait for Bernadette ←
14:51:50 <sandro> lots of PEOPLE issues....
lots of PEOPLE issues.... ←
14:52:00 <sandro> PhilA: Those can all be closed. I'll do that.
Phil Archer: Those can all be closed. I'll do that. ←
14:52:05 <sandro> issue-47?
14:52:05 <trackbot> ISSUE-47 -- RegOrg should be defined as an Org profile -- raised
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-47 -- RegOrg should be defined as an Org profile -- raised ←
14:52:05 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/47
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/47 ←
14:52:28 <sandro> PhilA: Yes, I'm planning to do this.
Phil Archer: Yes, I'm planning to do this. ←
14:52:30 <Zakim> +MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: +MakxDekkers ←
14:52:51 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: You've been talking about this for a while, and everyone seems supportive
Hadley Beeman: You've been talking about this for a while, and everyone seems supportive ←
14:53:27 <sandro> action: Phil to define RegOrg as a profile of org (and mark ISSUE-47 as closed)
ACTION: Phil to define RegOrg as a profile of org (and mark ISSUE-47 as closed) ←
14:53:27 <trackbot> Created ACTION-111 - Define RegOrg as a profile of org (and mark ISSUE-47 as closed) [on Phil Archer - due 2013-04-11].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-111 - Define RegOrg as a profile of org (and mark ISSUE-47 as closed) [on Phil Archer - due 2013-04-11]. ←
14:53:41 <sandro> issue-54
14:53:41 <trackbot> ISSUE-54 -- Relationship of DCAT and VoID -- raised
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-54 -- Relationship of DCAT and VoID -- raised ←
14:53:41 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/54
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/54 ←
14:54:05 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: I don't recall any discussion of this recently
Hadley Beeman: I don't recall any discussion of this recently ←
14:54:11 <sandro> (no one else does either)
(no one else does either) ←
14:54:41 <sandro> topic: dir.w3.org
14:54:49 <sandro> sandro: I saw the email; I haven't tried it yet
Sandro Hawke: I saw the email; I haven't tried it yet ←
14:55:07 <sandro> DaveReynolds: I thought there was a slight error in the vocab usage, which I think they're fixing
Dave Reynolds: I thought there was a slight error in the vocab usage, which I think they're fixing ←
14:55:14 <sandro> .. so maybe good to hold off
.. so maybe good to hold off ←
14:55:42 <sandro> topic: F2F
14:55:53 <sandro> phil: W3C is taking care of tea and coffee and the polycom
Phil Archer: W3C is taking care of tea and coffee and the polycom ←
14:57:26 <sandro> sandro: I think I can attend most of it remotely.
Sandro Hawke: I think I can attend most of it remotely. ←
14:57:37 <Zakim> -MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: -MakxDekkers ←
14:57:40 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Great. See / talk to you all next week in Dublin!
Hadley Beeman: Great. See / talk to you all next week in Dublin! ←
14:57:41 <Zakim> -james
Zakim IRC Bot: -james ←
14:57:42 <DaveReynolds> bye
Dave Reynolds: bye ←
14:57:42 <Zakim> -PhilA
Zakim IRC Bot: -PhilA ←
14:57:42 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman ←
14:57:43 <sandro> ADJOURN
ADJOURN ←
14:57:43 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
14:57:47 <MariosMeimaris> bye
Marios Meimaris: bye ←
14:57:50 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
14:57:51 <Zakim> -DaveReynolds
Zakim IRC Bot: -DaveReynolds ←
14:57:51 <Zakim> -MariosMeimaris
Zakim IRC Bot: -MariosMeimaris ←
14:57:51 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended ←
14:57:51 <Zakim> Attendees were HadleyBeeman, PhilA, Sandro, TallTed, DaveReynolds, james, MakxDekkers, MariosMeimaris
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were HadleyBeeman, PhilA, Sandro, TallTed, DaveReynolds, james, MakxDekkers, MariosMeimaris ←
14:58:10 <HadleyBeeman> Thank you, Sandro, for scribing :)
Hadley Beeman: Thank you, Sandro, for scribing :) ←
Formatted by CommonScribe