See also: IRC log
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10464
No need for TF to review, just a matter if getting around to implement the requested change
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10467
Ask ARIA team to review, but not a TF priority
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10424
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10438
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10440
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10441
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10447
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10479
Ask ARIA mapping team to review and update as the mappings are prepared, but no need for entire TF to review
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10439
Ask ARIA mapping team to review. Note bug triage sub-team thinks it's possible the "fix" is actually a negative accessibility benefit, but not sure. ARIA mapping team should escalate if needed.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10444
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10449
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10451
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10462
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
These are part of HTML-ISSUE-129. There is some debate on them taking place actively. Therefore these should be a TF priority.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10445
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10446
These bugs are under active discussion, therefore these should be a TF priority. Also for 10446, add the media keyword.
So the media sub-team can weigh in on if roles of media elements affect processing of media.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10434
<kliehm> scribe: Michael_Cooper
<kliehm> scribenick: MichaelC
Make a TF priority because of relationship to longdesc. Note catch 22 between relying on browser support before spec solution, and browsers waiting on spec. Not sure this is a longdesc solution, but needs to be considered and supported / opposed in context of overall longdesc strategy.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10463
Relates to http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-api-map/overview.html
(note this supplants an earlier draft Steve referenced)
Not a TF priority
integration of the HTML to AAPI mapping is important
but don't need TF review of the specific mechanism via a bug
assign bug to Steve
he can close or escalate
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10713
<kliehm> Already has a11yTF keyword
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10693
<kliehm> dito
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10657
<kliehm> Ask ARIA mapping team to review and update as the mappings are prepared, but no need for entire TF to review
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10645
<kliehm> The related ISSUE-133 has been closed without prejudice because no change proposals have been submitted, so this has not gained enough interest to be task force priority.
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 already has a11yTF keyword
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10618
<kliehm> Related to ISSUE-129, ask ARIA mapping team to review and update as the mappings are prepared, but no need for entire TF to review.
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10605
<kliehm> Verified fixed
(no longer needs to be in candidate list)
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9428
Not a TF priority
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10603
Not a TF priority, but do want ARIA mapping team to review. Has been associated with HTML-ISSUE-129.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10497
add aria keyword
but not a TF priority
don't think there will be support for doing anything on this, so recommend closing
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10496
Not a TF priority, and appears to be fixed
Steve should mark as verified if he agrees, or push back if needed
<kliehm> Michael reviews bugs 11395, 11391, 10963, 10900, 10927, 10921, 10918, 10917, 10916
<kliehm> Martin reviews 10915, 10839, 10781, 10780, 10779, 10778, 10775, 10773, 10419
<kliehm> Marco continues with his bugs.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Michael_Cooper Found ScribeNick: MichaelC Default Present: kliehm, Michael_Cooper Present: Martin_Kliehm Michael_Cooper WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list! Regrets: Laura_Carlson Marco_Ranon Joshue_O_Connor Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Dec/0153.html Got date from IRC log name: 14 Dec 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/14-a11y-bugs-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]