See also: IRC log
<wonsuk> HTML diff: http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff
<wonsuk> Wonsuk's version: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html?rev=1.18&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#tbd
<wonsuk> Veronique's version: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html?rev=1.17&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#tbd
<scribe> scribe: chris
<scribe> Scribe: chris
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Meeting_Agenda_Seoulf2f
<scribe> ACTION: Werner to update the Wiki with information on the next F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-215 - Update the Wiki with information on the next F2F [on Werner Bailer - due 2010-03-03].
<wonsuk> updated ontology doc: http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
<tmichel> I have set a new code for the zakim for today :26631
<wonsuk> updated ontology doc: http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
<tmichel> veronique sent an update yesterday
<tmichel> Wonsuk and Joakim added the datatypes discussed yesterday during the meeting
<tmichel> also went thought the mail of Florian
<tmichel> adopted it all except the keyword property
<tmichel> should discuss it now
<jsderber> here we want to change the definition...keyword
<jsderber> > should be only keyword - but maybe more tokens
<tmichel> skipt descriptive phrase and only use keyword
<tmichel> now the keyword property is a string
<tmichel> anyone against that change ?
<tmichel> Silence ...
<tmichel> Rigo ask about about the PLING ...
use of policy in stead of license is described on wiki in sub types page
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Sub_Types
<tmichel> will add the refrence to the policy.
<tmichel> Joakim: We can go to Last before 15th of March or after 01 April . due to publication blackout in the W3C
<tmichel> Florian: Dom suggested that we should have another revue before going to Last Call.
<florian> ...There is a pretty strong overlap between that work and some of the work
<florian> in the DAP Working Group (e.g. the Capture API, the possible Gallery
<florian> API), so I would suggest asking a review from the DAP Working Group much
<florian> earlier than at last call.
<florian> ...
<florian> (comment from Dominique Hazael-Massieux)
<tmichel> Chris replied to Dom about the Validation issue of WebIDL in the API doc
<tmichel> the validtor does not validate aginst the last version of WebIDL
<tmichel> Joakim sent d review request to Doug. could do the same for Sylvia.
<fsasaki> +1 to werner - better to get feedback before last call, esp. from DAP and webapps WG
<florian> +1 @ Werner
<tmichel> Would like to have feedback from specific people
<tmichel> and LC will bring feed back from WGs, etc
<tmichel> Resolution: Will request a 2nd version as Public WD of the Ontology doc.
<tmichel> wonsuk: current version is publishable
<tmichel> should also fill in the datatype in the mapping table
<tmichel> should be done fot the Last Call publication
<tmichel> Wonsuk: syntactic mapping should be done for Last Call
<florian> +1 to fill in syntactic mappings asap
<fsasaki> +1 to florian et al.
who will track this?
meaning who will bother the reponsible people for each metadata format to create the syntactic mappings
<tmichel> some format like UBU MPEG7 can be time consuming to fill in these datatypes
<tmichel> We will have incomplete formats as we are missing some input from some companies like apple for QT
<tmichel> For these we will be missing the datatypes ...
<tmichel> and may have to remove these formats missing information
<tmichel> People may want to contribute while going to REC
<tmichel> other reviewers apart from Sylivia ?
<tmichel> Joakim proposes to talk about the API document
<tmichel> chris: worked on the API doc and update with the chances in the datatypes
<tmichel> chris: included some issues from the wiki list in the API doc
<tmichel> Felix propose also to update this document
<fsasaki> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Feb/0070.html
<fsasaki> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Feb/0070.html
<tmichel> Felix would like to add concrete examples about web service ?
<tmichel> felix proposal for an addition to the API document to
<tmichel> demonstrate the "service" usage.
<wbailer> +1 for adding this
<florian> +1
<tobias> +1 for felix
<wonsuk> +1
<fsasaki> felix: if you agree on this I would take the document offline, e.g. Friday in the morning european time, and make the update
<florian> would be very interested in that because tobias and me want to do a webservice implementation of the api (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Feb/0072.html)
<tmichel> +1
<tmichel> chris: should base yourself on the latest API version doc
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html
<fsasaki> felix: sorry, dropped of. I will use the latest API document for that update
<fsasaki> .. that is, the link chris gave above
ok, then it looks like a very usable update
I still need to upload the changes of this F2F to the API document
<tmichel> felix: it is difficult tohear you well ...
<tmichel> Felix: OK will do the changes
<fsasaki> ACTION: Felix to update the API document with the service description proposed at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Feb/att-0070/ma-api-service-approach.pdf , after getting the latest version of the doc from Chris [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-216 - Update the API document with the service description proposed at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Feb/att-0070/ma-api-service-approach.pdf , after getting the latest version of the doc from Chris [on Felix Sasaki - due 2010-03-03].
<tmichel> Joakim: chris or Veronique raised how do we use semantic mappings
<tmichel> "specifc" or "more general" ..
<tmichel> if you ask a metadata that as a "more general", the agent could fetch the specifc property in the initial metadata
<tmichel> could have an alert to say there is more info behing in the propriatary format to get the extended structure
<tmichel> in some cases we have a loss of information with our core property.
<tmichel> could have an API to get the information "specifc" or "more general" .... but not yet accurate enough
<tmichel> .. and could postpone (chris)
<tmichel> not strictly defined and mapping table does not make it really clear with "specifc" or "more general" ..
<tmichel> not an issue with the API doc, more an issue with the ontology
I can come up with a proposal in the API doc to retrieve the type of relationship between the metadata
<tmichel> ACTION: Joakim to ask Sylvia to review the doc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-217 - Ask Sylvia to review the doc [on Joakim Söderberg - due 2010-03-03].
<tmichel> ACTION: Joakim contact the webapps, geolocation WGs to review the API document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-218 - Contact the webapps, geolocation WGs to review the API document [on Joakim Söderberg - due 2010-03-03].
<tmichel> ACTION: felix to update the API doc e with the service description [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-219 - Update the API doc e with the service description [on Felix Sasaki - due 2010-03-03].
<tmichel> Joakim when can we republish the API ?
<tmichel> ... when Felix has updated the API doc
<tmichel> Daniel had a proposal to make the F2F longer like a 3 days meeting
<florian> +1 for three day
<jsderber> +1
<wbailer> +1
<wonsuk> +1 for three days :)
is it no problem for the host?
<tmichel> which days ?
<wbailer> april 27-28 is currently planned
<tmichel> tuesday/wed/thrusday ?
<wbailer> question is adding 26 or 29
<tobias> I prefer Tuesday to Thursday.
<jsderber> +1
+1
<wonsuk> +1
<florian> +1
<fsasaki> sorry, have to drop of. Take care, and congrats to the good meeting and progress!
<florian> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Feb/0072.html
<tmichel> thierry: We should publish the LC end of march. and could discuss the comments after the 4 weeks review during the F2F in april
<tmichel> we should have an mplementation on the "webservice" scenario
<tmichel> .
<tmichel> Forian: the implementation will cover the "webservice" scenario
<tmichel> for the browser it needs a plugin development
<tmichel> Joakim: all are implementation are currently server based
<tmichel> Florian:do we have experience in plug in development in the WG ?
<tmichel> ACTION: Thierry to investigate into the tool to transform WebIDL example intoi testsuite [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-220 - Investigate into the tool to transform WebIDL example intoi testsuite [on Thierry Michel - due 2010-03-03].
<tobias> +1 for next tuesday.
<tmichel> next telecon: next tuesday
<florian> +1
<tmichel> next telecon 2nd of March to be confirmed by Joakim (on vacation next week).
<tmichel> Daniel should chair (currently in Moscou)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Joakil/Joakim/ Succeeded: s/Floarian/Florian/ Succeeded: s/Dom should/Dom suggested that we should/ Succeeded: s/2/2nd/ Succeeded: s/chances/changes/ Succeeded: s/vcatiuon/vacation/ Found Scribe: chris Inferring ScribeNick: chris Found Scribe: chris Inferring ScribeNick: chris WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Present: Florian Joakim Wonsuk Felix chris daniel jsderber tmichel tobias wbailer Got date from IRC log name: 24 Feb 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediaann-minutes.html People with action items: felix joakim thierry werner WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]