<trackbot> Date: 17 November 2009

<dug> who is 353?

<asoldano> I've muted my line

<dug> I blame martin :-)

<Bob> scribenick: Vikas

<dug> woo hoo - scribe volunteers! what a concept!

Dug: Request to defer 6463.

<scribe> AGENDA: Accepted within the working group

RESOLUTION: The minutes from 2009-11-05/06 meeting has been approved without objection.

Upcoming meetings.

Bob: Meeting of 11/24 and 12/22 is cancelled without objection
... Meeting of 12/29 is also cancelled without objection.

New Issue Moratorium

Bob: Calrify if an issue shows up after 11/13, will look at it after LC.

New Issues

Issue-8273

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8273

<dug> what about just pointing to: http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicSecurity/SecurityChallenges-1.0-errata-2006-08-14.html

Bob: Any objection to make it LC issue?

<DaveS> Dave S Joins the phone call.

Dug/Gil: agrees to make it LC issue.

Bob: 8273 is placed in LC issue.

Issue: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8280

<trackbot> Created ISSUE-2 - Http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8280 ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/tracker/issues/2/edit .

<dug> s/MUST understand/MUST support/

<asoldano> someone need to rollack ^

<asoldano> *rollback

RESOLUTION: 8280 resolved as proposed

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8284

Bob: Any objection to make 8284 as possibly substantive issue.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8181

Bob: Any objection to accept 8181 as new issue

Asir: Asking for more details before accepting it

<asir> Yeah, but what if members don't understand the issue

Tom: The confusion highlighted in the issue need to be clarified...and looks a valid issue.

Bob: 8181 accepted and is placed in current issue category

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8182

<asir> Recommend that issue openers provide justification rather than creating placeholders

Bob: 8182 accepted and is placed in current issue category

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8185

Bob: 8185 accepted as LC issue without objection

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8192

Bob: 8192 accepted as current issue without objection

Ram: 8191 is missing from the list

Bob: 8191 is accepted without objection.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8193

Bob: 8193 accepted as LC issue without objection

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8194

<Vikas1> Bob, please assign Vikas1 as scribe

<Vikas1> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8195

<Yves> scribenick Vikas1

<Bob> scribenick: Vikas1

Asir: Asking for more substantive description on the issue.

<asir2> XML Schema, XQuery and XSLT uses XPath

<asir2> they have not bumped into these issues

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8231

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8257

Bob: 8257 accepted as LC issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8258

Bob: 8258 accepted as LC issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8164

Dug: Editorial which requires some discussion, sugegst it as a current issue.

Bob: 8164 accepted as current issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8165

Bob: 8165 accepted as LC issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8176

Dug: suggest pre-LC

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8271

Gil: Suggest it as a current issue, which requires some discusison.

Wu: Suggest it as LC

<asir2> should we document that this issue is limited to fixing RFC terms?

<dug> we can't make this determination until we see the proposal

<dug> I wasn't done

<asir2> What I am hearing is that the issue description is incomplete and is a place holder for future issues

<asir2> 2119 scan sounds good

<asir2> Did Bob invent the phrase '2119 scan'?

Bob: 8271 accepted as current issue

<scribe> scribenick: Vikas1

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8274

Bob: Closed with no action

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8275

Gil: LC

Dug: substantive

Bob: 8275 accepted as current issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8276

RESOLUTION: 8276 resolved with current proposal

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8277

RESOLUTION: 8277 resolved with current proposal

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8281

Bob: 8281 accepted as current issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283

Bob: 8283 accepted as current issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8285

<li> noise

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8286

Bob: 8286 accepted as current issue

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8287

Bob: accepted as LC issue

<MartinC> pumpkin time

<asoldano> bye

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8288

<MartinC> night

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/133/13/
FAILED: s/MUST understand/MUST support/
Found ScribeNick: Vikas
Found ScribeNick: Vikas1
Found ScribeNick: Vikas1
Inferring Scribes: Vikas, Vikas1
Scribes: Vikas, Vikas1
ScribeNicks: Vikas, Vikas1

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Ashok Ashok_Malhotra Asir Bob DaveS Gil MartinC P0 Ram Tom Tom_Rutt Vikas1 Wu Wu_Chou Yves asir2 asoldano dug gpilz joined li scribenick trackbot ws-ra
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0057.html

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 17 Nov 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/11/17-ws-ra-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.