See also: IRC log
<hui> I also, will only follow the irc, sorry
once Felix is coming, let's start today call since he is a scriber today
<thierry> what time is the Annot WG call today ?
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-mediaann-minutes.html
any volunteeer for the next call ?
if you would be a scriber, then let chairs know later via email
we'd confirm UTC 13:00 for every call from the next, so don't be confused
any comments on this changes ?
<jsderber> Change meeting hours to permanent at 13.00!
<jsderber> +1
<wonsuk> +1
<ruben> +1
<hui> +1
next call December 16 13:00 UTC
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Meeting_Agenda_Ghentf2f_2008
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
ACTION-32 is closed
I've sent an official liaison letter to MPEG.
ACTION-42 is closed
ACTION-20/22/33 is postponed since Felix is not coming
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/FeaturesTable
<jsderber> Ruben added comments to the table
Ruben is changing the feature tables
<jsderber> Victor can speak about the feature table in Ghent
Ruben's colleague will be able to participate f2f meeting. then he will speak about that
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/FlickrMachineTags
can you elaborate on the machine tags in brief ?
<jsderber> Continue discussions about flickr machine tags on next mwwting
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/issues/open/
Felix proposed a new format for use case & req. document.
since Felix is not coming today, the updated document will be sent to the mailing list later
<wonsuk> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
top-down approach is removed from the previous version
<Vero> the idea is that people who contributed to the use cases could elaborate on them according to the new templte
<Vero> and they would be integrated in the general use case document
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/MXM
contributor will speak about MXM issue at Ghent meeting
<jsderber> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/MetadataExchangeUsecase
I can't hear Veronique's voice on the phone
my question: it's incluced in our document ?
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html
please take a look at these links, and let group know if you have any opinion on these
<Vero> yes, it is part of the above document, section 2.8 MEtadata exchange
<Vero> Felix has added it to the new version, according to his template
<jsderber> Does Veronique or Wonsuk like to comment the editorial work?
also, do you mind if we have this metadata exchange use case without any discussion ?
<Vero> well, I think that the document as Felix has restructured it is quite clear and up to the point
<Vero> if the WG would approve it, we could edit the application scenario and uses cases that have yet to be re-edited
<Vero> with the contributor's inputs
<Vero> anyone can discuss the use cases and requirements
<Vero> nothing is definitive yet
<Vero> but this structure is simple and efficient, so I would vote to keep it like it is
<Vero> the content can be further discussed, of course
<Vero> and new use cases added
<jsderber> Ask everyone to read the document and come with comments before the F2F
question: we would vote to keep it like it is
+1
<Vero> what is "it"?
<Vero> the structure or the content?
it means the current format of use case and requirement document
<Vero> ok, +1
<wonsuk> +1
<jsderber> +1
<ruben> +1
<Vero> nothing special
any other issues ?
thanks. and have a safe trip to Ghent
<wonsuk> see you in ghent..
<wonsuk> bye
hi
we've done today call
<jsderber> I did the same two weeks ago!
13: 00 UTC, 22:00 in Korea and Japan
<jsderber> (missed by 1 h)