W3C | TAG | Previous: 28 Apr teleconference | Next: 12 May 2003 teleconf

Agenda for 5 May 2003 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (45min)

1. Confirm Chair (NW), Scribe (IJ). Regrets: SW, PC (likely), TB.
2. Accept 28 Apr teleconference minutes?
3. Accept this agenda?
4. Next meeting: 12 May with Voice Browser WG?

1.1 Meeting planning

• Please register for AC meeting and WWW2003 if you are a speaker.
• TAG virtual meetings 2 and 19 June (no meeting 16 June).

  Action SW 2003/04/14: Propose meeting times, structure to TAG.

1.2 W3C Track Presentation

• W3C track
• Action PC 2003/04/14: Propose TAG's WWW2003 report to TAG. Due 5 May

1.3 TAG report at AC meeting

1. Suggestions for TAG presentation at May AC Meeting from DO and PC
2. Action DO, CL: Present TAG's AC meeting report to TAG. Due 5 May

2. Technical (45min)

2.1 Issues the TAG intends to discuss

• whenToUseGet-7
  • Solicit review of revised draft finding from IJ?
  • IJ proposal: Take into account DC's comments and then solicit review.
• contentTypeOverride-24
  • Solicit review of draft finding from IJ?
  • Completed action SW, NW 2003/04/17: Read Client handling of MIME headers. If +2, then IJ will send to www-tag. (Done)
• uriMediaType-9
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
  • IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft (see email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close this issue?
• abstractComponentRefs-37
  • See issue description from David Orchard
  • Next steps?
• namespaceDocument-8
  • Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a canonical mapping to RDF.
  • Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue, pointing to the RDDL Note. See comments from Paul regarding TB theses.
  • Action TB 2003/04/28: Draft a TAG opinion on the use of URNs for namespace names, for review by the TAG
    • RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of institutional commitment and frequency of use.
• Other issues?
• Updates on action items?

2.2 Architecture document

See also: findings.

1. 26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
   1. Completed action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under 2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft. See request from DanC to consider this subsumed based on 26 Mar 2003 Arch Doc text.
   2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
   3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste and put into DC writing.
   4. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions chapter of arch doc related to message passing, a dual of shared state.

2.3 Issues that have associated action items

• xlinkScope-23
  • Status report?
  • See draft, and SW message to CG chairs.
• IRIEverywhere-27
  • Completed action TB 2003/04/14: Draft a proposed step forward on IRI 27. (Done). In that email, TB proposes to close this issue.
  • Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
  • Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications that handle IRIs are inconsistent. (Action unclear from 28 Apr minutes).
• URIEquivalence-15
  • SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where Tim Bray text has been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this issue to pending state.
• xmlIDSemantics-32
  • See Chris Lilley draft finding. Next steps?
• siteData-36
  • Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
• xmlFunctions-34
  • Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to XML Core work. See email from TimBL capturing some of the issues.
• binaryXML-30
  • Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on adding to survey.
  • Next steps to finding? See summary from Chris.
• contentPresentation-26
  • Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space. Due 3 March.
• rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema desideratum (RQ-23).
• HTTPSubstrate-16
  • Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended to be excluded from RFC 3205
  • See message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
• errorHandling-20
  • Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3) robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error has been signaled. Due first week of March.
• metadataInURI-31
  • Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
  • See also TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI schemes instead of headers
• fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
  1. Connection to content negotiation?
  2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
  3. No actions associated / no owner.

3. Other actions

• Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in May.