ACTION-1 |
closed |
(or Yves) Ensure that all Group participants are subscribed to the public list public-soap-jms |
Philippe Le Hégaret |
2008-05-31 |
|
ACTION-2 |
closed |
Register everyone on the Public Mailing list |
Yves Lafon |
2008-05-13 |
|
ACTION-3 |
closed |
Request a weekly bridge for the SOAP-JMS WG |
Yves Lafon |
2008-05-13 |
|
ACTION-4 |
closed |
Send information to bhakti about using CVS |
Roland Merrick |
2008-05-20 |
|
ACTION-5 |
closed |
And Phil will take a first pass of the spec to identify assertions |
Peter Easton |
2008-05-27 |
|
ACTION-6 |
closed |
Write up a test proposal due next week |
Amelia Lewis |
2008-06-03 |
|
ACTION-7 |
closed |
Write up a test proposal due next week |
Phil Adams |
2008-06-03 |
|
ACTION-8 |
closed |
Take a look at the way that WSDL assertions are marked up and to try and apply it to soap-jms spec. |
Peter Easton |
2008-06-10 |
|
ACTION-9 |
closed |
And alewis to provide draft methodology due 7/1 |
Phil Adams |
2008-06-17 |
|
ACTION-10 |
closed |
Send mail to the list about the progress so far. |
Amelia Lewis |
2008-06-24 |
|
ACTION-11 |
closed |
- write up email with nits discovered in the spec during the review for testing |
Eric Johnson |
2008-06-24 |
|
ACTION-12 |
closed |
Write a proposal of the JMS API example text that should appear in each section (2.2.2 & 2.2.23) of the spec. |
Phil Adams |
2008-07-01 |
|
ACTION-13 |
closed |
Investigate abiguity about "MUST fully support the JMS IRI" and fix where necessary |
Eric Johnson |
2008-07-01 |
|
ACTION-14 |
closed |
Add text to say in sction 2.6 you MUST use replyToName and in 2.7 it should say you MUST NOT use it |
Roland Merrick |
2008-07-01 |
|
ACTION-15 |
closed |
Check how we should make the disctinction between normative and non-normative |
Roland Merrick |
2008-07-22 |
|
ACTION-16 |
closed |
Write up one or two initial test scenarios - a one-way and request-response |
Phil Adams |
2008-07-29 |
|
ACTION-17 |
closed |
Work on the XML format for test cases (not glen) |
Peter Easton |
2008-08-05 |
|
ACTION-18 |
closed |
Come up with more example text for section 2.2.3.1 or 2.2.2.1 |
Eric Johnson |
2008-08-05 |
|
ACTION-19 |
closed |
Write up an answer to the question of WS-Addressing. |
Bhakti Mehta |
2008-11-04 |
|
ACTION-20 |
closed |
Write note to a mailing list summarizing the opinion of the group, that WS-Addressing is out of scope, but we understand the question, we will develop FAQ materials. |
Glen Daniels |
2008-08-05 |
|
ACTION-21 |
closed |
Respond to email on JMS properties in WSDL |
Eric Johnson |
2008-08-19 |
|
ACTION-22 |
closed |
raise possible use cases clarification for jndi URI additional parameters mapping to JMS headers |
Derek Rokicki |
2008-08-19 |
|
ACTION-23 |
closed |
Review the relevant parts of the XML Schema draft on behalf of SOAP/JMS WG |
Mark Phillips |
2008-09-12 |
|
ACTION-24 |
closed |
Present test case message examples with additions styled after peter's suggestions |
Phil Adams |
2008-08-26 |
|
ACTION-25 |
closed |
Look at wording that might allow vendor to use TextMessage and not break specifications |
Phil Adams |
2008-08-26 |
|
ACTION-26 |
closed |
Incorporate changes into test case proposal, as brought up in 2008/8/26 discussion |
Phil Adams |
2008-09-02 |
|
ACTION-27 |
closed |
Examine/update xslt for test cases, once test cases stabilizes |
Eric Johnson |
2008-09-09 |
|
ACTION-28 |
closed |
Add test case documents and scripts to version control |
Roland Merrick |
2008-09-16 |
|
ACTION-29 |
closed |
Write up a proposal to differentiate JNDI connection properties in the URI and WSDL |
Derek Rokicki |
2008-09-09 |
|
ACTION-30 |
closed |
Write up the options for using TextMessage that we have discussed so that we can identify and discuss the scenarios |
Eric Johnson |
2008-09-09 |
|
ACTION-31 |
closed |
Create an additional view showing all the features and which test cases exercise the feature |
Phil Adams |
2008-09-16 |
|
ACTION-32 |
closed |
Will create at least one additional testcase |
Eric Johnson |
2008-09-16 |
|
ACTION-33 |
closed |
Write up a proposal for what to do with jms URI queue and topic proposal. |
Eric Johnson |
2008-09-23 |
|
ACTION-34 |
closed |
Write up specific proposal on how to support TextMessage. |
Phil Adams |
2008-09-23 |
|
ACTION-35 |
closed |
Update proposal re context variant and reply to for queue and topic |
Eric Johnson |
2008-09-30 |
|
ACTION-36 |
closed |
Write up details around the use of text message, specifically addressing the "encoding" element in XML, the increased size as a consequence of base64 encoding. |
Eric Johnson |
2008-10-07 |
|
ACTION-37 |
closed |
Write up how to indicate use of text message in WSDL. |
Peter Easton |
2008-10-07 |
|
ACTION-38 |
closed |
- put the just agreed-upon changes related to TextMessage into the spec (Phil's write up & Eric's writeup) |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-14 |
|
ACTION-39 |
closed |
Email/phone Oracle/BEA to see if they want to continue to be listed on the URI specification by 2008-10-08 |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-14 |
|
ACTION-40 |
closed |
Write up specific proposal for conformance to address the normative concerns. |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-14 |
|
ACTION-41 |
closed |
Clarify the fault to be returned when the arriving message is neither Bytes or Text message |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-21 |
|
ACTION-42 |
closed |
Clarify the conformance section (1.6) to make it clear that the URI scheme MUST be fully supported in the base protocol (just refer to it once) |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-21 |
|
ACTION-43 |
closed |
Mail the JMS URI draft to the IETF Secretariat mailing list to move the process to the next stage |
Eric Johnson |
2008-11-04 |
|
ACTION-44 |
closed |
Create a Schema for the WSDL extensions |
Mark Phillips |
2008-10-21 |
|
ACTION-45 |
closed |
Tidy up the proposal factoring in Eric's changes and splitting the proposal into 2 parts - URI spec and Binding |
Derek Rokicki |
2008-10-21 |
|
ACTION-46 |
closed |
Make changes for name and value attributes and place xml schema as appendix in spec |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-27 |
|
ACTION-47 |
closed |
Incorporate jndi- props into spec |
Roland Merrick |
2008-10-28 |
|
ACTION-48 |
closed |
Look at Destination and terms in general in spec perhaps post LC |
Roland Merrick |
2009-01-20 |
|
ACTION-49 |
closed |
Update URI spec to adopt Alfred's comments and the jndi context parms |
Eric Johnson |
2008-11-03 |
|
ACTION-50 |
closed |
Add note for Last Call regarding feedback requested on precedence wordings etc |
Roland Merrick |
2008-11-03 |
|
ACTION-51 |
closed |
Add a test case. |
Peter Easton |
2008-11-18 |
|
ACTION-52 |
closed |
- make sure everyone has CVS access for creating test cases. |
Yves Lafon |
2008-11-18 |
|
ACTION-53 |
closed |
Provide testcase(s) in properties area |
Derek Rokicki |
2008-12-02 |
|
ACTION-54 |
closed |
Send email to secretary general to progress the IETF spec |
Eric Johnson |
2008-12-01 |
|
ACTION-55 |
closed |
Look at the relevant specifications e.g. SOAP with Attachments to assess whether SOAP/JMS binding spec. needs the assertions regarding content type |
Phil Adams |
2008-12-09 |
|
ACTION-56 |
closed |
Add answer to FAQ on how to use WSA anonymous and JMS ReplyTo |
Peter Easton |
2008-12-23 |
|
ACTION-57 |
closed |
Raise spec question independently after call |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-01-20 |
|
ACTION-58 |
closed |
Respond to Yong-Ping |
Roland Merrick |
2009-02-03 |
|
ACTION-59 |
closed |
Send email about LC-04 based on minutes from conf. call of Jan-27 |
Roland Merrick |
2009-02-03 |
|
ACTION-60 |
closed |
Respond with email saying that there is no fault. |
Roland Merrick |
2009-02-03 |
|
ACTION-61 |
closed |
Come up with a proposal to make sure we're consistent. |
Phil Adams |
2009-02-03 |
|
ACTION-62 |
closed |
Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property) |
Peter Easton |
2009-02-10 |
|
ACTION-63 |
closed |
Respond to dongbo to say that the spec has been clarified re: IRI scheme jndi requirement |
Roland Merrick |
2009-02-10 |
|
ACTION-64 |
closed |
Clarify spec about topic replyToName |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-02-17 |
|
ACTION-65 |
closed |
Clarify for content Type |
Phil Adams |
2009-02-17 |
|
ACTION-66 |
closed |
Bring up the additional MEP |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-02-17 |
|
ACTION-67 |
closed |
Redraft words re replyTo and topicReplyTO |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-03-03 |
|
ACTION-68 |
closed |
Draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO for publication in an FAQ |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-05-29 |
|
ACTION-69 |
closed |
Come up with revised URI scheme pass for review next week |
Eric Johnson |
2009-03-17 |
|
ACTION-70 |
closed |
Take another pass of the Content Type wording |
Eric Johnson |
2009-03-17 |
|
ACTION-71 |
closed |
Incorporate latest act 65 wordings in spec and email original Last Call commentor |
Peter Easton |
2009-03-17 |
|
ACTION-72 |
closed |
Incorporate Derek's text into spec. |
Roland Merrick |
2009-03-24 |
|
ACTION-73 |
closed |
Follow up IRI jndi issue after next week with Harald |
Eric Johnson |
2009-03-24 |
|
ACTION-74 |
closed |
Examine the wording of the conformance requirements section |
Roland Merrick |
2009-03-31 |
|
ACTION-75 |
closed |
Look at Dongbo's last point - what should an implementation do if it does not support a URI variant |
Phil Adams |
2009-03-31 |
|
ACTION-76 |
closed |
Change the Binding specification to use \"NON_PERSISTENT\" in 5 places where we use \"NONPERSISTENT\" |
Roland Merrick |
2009-03-31 |
|
ACTION-77 |
closed |
Clarify precedence of URI etc in WSDL 3.4.5 |
Amelia Lewis |
2009-04-07 |
|
ACTION-78 |
closed |
Chase acknowledgement of all our responses |
Roland Merrick |
2009-04-07 |
|
ACTION-79 |
closed |
Review the SOAP-JMS Binding spec to see if any changes are required for new jndi naming scheme |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-04-14 |
|
ACTION-80 |
closed |
Remove point 3 (properties come from JMS URI) from section 2.2 |
Roland Merrick |
2009-04-14 |
|
ACTION-81 |
closed |
update the spec. with "jndi-" prefix changes (when we get confirmation from Harald) |
Roland Merrick |
2009-04-21 |
|
ACTION-82 |
closed |
Update the spec. with Phil and Eric's changes to contentType |
Roland Merrick |
2009-04-21 |
|
ACTION-83 |
closed |
Close email thread on LC comments 7,8,9 |
Roland Merrick |
2009-04-28 |
|
ACTION-84 |
closed |
Reword the assertions 2035, 2039, and 2041 so that they make more sense |
Roland Merrick |
2009-05-12 |
|
ACTION-85 |
closed |
See whether assertion 2042 can be removed bacause all faults are covered by their own assertion |
Roland Merrick |
2009-05-12 |
|
ACTION-86 |
closed |
Ask Yves what the best way to record / store the FAQ? |
Eric Johnson |
2009-06-16 |
|
ACTION-87 |
closed |
Find out if Axis 2 has an implementation of the SOAP/JMS Binding spec. |
Phil Adams |
2009-06-16 |
|
ACTION-88 |
closed |
Send contact details to Eric to update the URI scheme |
Mark Phillips |
2009-06-23 |
|
ACTION-89 |
closed |
Review the test assertion IDs to see which ones we _really_ need to test |
Eric Johnson |
2009-06-23 |
|
ACTION-90 |
closed |
Follow up contacts with CXF to find out timeframes etc. |
Peter Easton |
2009-06-30 |
|
ACTION-91 |
closed |
Propose a change to Spec. wording to remedy inconsistency in MIME example vs. Protocol-2029 assertion |
Eric Johnson |
2009-07-21 |
Incorrect example, section C2 |
ACTION-92 |
closed |
Propose the wording for the change to split 2024 into three testable assertions |
Mark Phillips |
2009-07-21 |
|
ACTION-93 |
closed |
Propose the revised table to the list |
Eric Johnson |
2009-07-21 |
requestURI in response message? |
ACTION-94 |
closed |
to reword the protocol-2024 proposal |
Mark Phillips |
2009-07-28 |
|
ACTION-95 |
closed |
Raise a tracking issue for each of the specification changes we have proposed |
Eric Johnson |
2009-07-28 |
|
ACTION-96 |
closed |
Formulate further FAQ questions |
Amelia Lewis |
2009-07-28 |
|
ACTION-97 |
closed |
Formulate further FAQ questions |
Derek Rokicki |
2009-07-28 |
|
ACTION-98 |
closed |
Formulate further FAQ questions |
Phil Adams |
2009-07-28 |
|
ACTION-99 |
closed |
Edit the FAQ page to add a general structure to the Wiki |
Eric Johnson |
2009-07-28 |
|
ACTION-100 |
closed |
Apply Issue-7 resolution to spec CVS commit is acceptable |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-11 |
|
ACTION-101 |
closed |
Apply 1,2,3,5,6 issue resolutions to spec CVS commit is acceptable |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-11 |
|
ACTION-102 |
closed |
Update the spec with Eric's proposal for issue 8 |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-18 |
|
ACTION-103 |
closed |
Make the Issue-2 changes consistent with Issue-1 |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-18 |
|
ACTION-104 |
closed |
reapply the resolution for issue 6 (remove JMS Priority) |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-18 |
|
ACTION-105 |
closed |
Apply issue 10 proposal |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-25 |
redundant assertions 2016 and 2017 |
ACTION-106 |
closed |
Propose UDDI FAQ |
Eric Johnson |
2009-08-25 |
|
ACTION-107 |
closed |
Regen testing tables etc |
Phil Adams |
2009-08-25 |
|
ACTION-108 |
closed |
Come up with a more concrete proposal on the wsdl testing |
Eric Johnson |
2009-08-25 |
|
ACTION-109 |
closed |
Update the specification to reflect the change to Protocol 2021 assertion |
Mark Phillips |
2009-09-15 |
Protocol-2024 needs restructuring |
ACTION-110 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for Issue-9 |
Phil Adams |
2009-09-15 |
ISSUE-9 |
ACTION-111 |
closed |
Investigate the correct syntax for closing the MIME boundary |
Eric Johnson |
2009-09-15 |
Bad MIME terminating boundary |
ACTION-112 |
closed |
Review test cases to identify which ones could have associated WSDL |
Eric Johnson |
2009-09-15 |
|
ACTION-113 |
closed |
Discuss UDDI entry wording with IBM UDDI rep. |
Mark Phillips |
2009-09-22 |
|
ACTION-114 |
closed |
Apply Resolution For Issue 12 |
Phil Adams |
2009-10-06 |
Bad MIME terminating boundary |
ACTION-115 |
closed |
Apply Resolution For Issue 13 |
Phil Adams |
2009-10-06 |
Extra space in Schema |
ACTION-116 |
closed |
Correct the "soap" prefix reference in section 3.4.5 |
Eric Johnson |
2009-10-20 |
|
ACTION-117 |
closed |
Make the updates for issue 14 |
Phil Adams |
2009-10-20 |
|
ACTION-118 |
closed |
Review the spec for references, and propose resolution |
Eric Johnson |
2009-10-27 |
|
ACTION-119 |
closed |
Try to determine what is normative and how to generate test cases. |
Eric Johnson |
2009-10-27 |
|
ACTION-120 |
closed |
Remove the duplication from 2.2.4 |
Mark Phillips |
2009-11-03 |
|
ACTION-121 |
closed |
Make the changes recorded under the proposed resolution for Issue 15 |
Phil Adams |
2009-11-17 |
|
ACTION-122 |
closed |
Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 16 |
Phil Adams |
2009-11-17 |
|
ACTION-123 |
closed |
Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 17 |
Mark Phillips |
2009-11-17 |
|
ACTION-124 |
closed |
Reply to Eric's email with a counter-proposal for sections 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 |
Phil Adams |
2009-11-17 |
|
ACTION-125 |
closed |
to make the changes for Issue 18 |
Mark Phillips |
2009-11-17 |
|
ACTION-126 |
closed |
Close out the issues we resolve in this call |
Peter Easton |
2009-12-08 |
|
ACTION-127 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for Issue 19 |
Phil Adams |
2009-12-08 |
|
ACTION-128 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for Issue 20 |
Phil Adams |
2009-12-08 |
|
ACTION-129 |
closed |
Update the FAQ with the changes proposed by action 68 |
Peter Easton |
2009-12-08 |
|
ACTION-130 |
closed |
Prototype a WSDL test case |
Phil Adams |
2009-12-08 |
|
ACTION-131 |
closed |
Update test cases 6 & 7 to reflect the decison on WSDL snippets |
Phil Adams |
2010-01-19 |
|
ACTION-132 |
closed |
Provide feedback on tc 7 wsdl20 correctness |
Amelia Lewis |
2010-01-26 |
|
ACTION-133 |
closed |
Revise testcase formatting and vary values in hierarchy for wsdl tests |
Phil Adams |
2010-01-26 |
|
ACTION-134 |
closed |
Propose alternative wording to Issue 26 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-02-02 |
|
ACTION-135 |
closed |
to apply the resolution for Issue 22 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-02 |
|
ACTION-136 |
closed |
to revise the proposal for Issue 25 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-02 |
|
ACTION-137 |
closed |
Get clarification on Issue 23 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-09 |
|
ACTION-138 |
closed |
Raise the question of Topic support as an issue |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-16 |
|
ACTION-139 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for issue 25 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-16 |
|
ACTION-140 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for issue 24 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-16 |
|
ACTION-141 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for issue 26 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-02-16 |
|
ACTION-142 |
closed |
Revise test cases 6 & 7 to pick a more sensible property than replyToName to come from thewsdl binding |
Eric Johnson |
2010-02-23 |
|
ACTION-143 |
closed |
Ensure that we have tests for all the WSDL assertions |
Eric Johnson |
2010-02-23 |
|
ACTION-144 |
closed |
Review half the test cases (and send a note to Eric saying which ones ) |
Phil Adams |
2010-02-23 |
|
ACTION-145 |
closed |
Review the other half of the test cases |
Eric Johnson |
2010-02-23 |
|
ACTION-146 |
closed |
Follow up URI specification with Oracle |
Eric Johnson |
2010-03-09 |
|
ACTION-147 |
closed |
Apply the resolution to issue 28 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-03-09 |
|
ACTION-148 |
closed |
Review proposal, and debate on mailing list or propose a FAQ change |
Mark Phillips |
2010-03-09 |
|
ACTION-149 |
closed |
Update testcase 6,7 to fix text in "message flow" section to reflect changes made to WSDL fragment |
Eric Johnson |
2010-03-16 |
|
ACTION-150 |
closed |
Raise issue re: assertion 2014 and propose a resolution |
Phil Adams |
2010-03-16 |
|
ACTION-151 |
closed |
Develop a proposal for how to address protocol-2015 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-03-16 |
|
ACTION-152 |
closed |
Address use of the word "may" in the second bullet of the soapjms:contentType description within the SOAP/JMS binding spec |
Eric Johnson |
2010-03-16 |
|
ACTION-153 |
closed |
Investigate feasibility of operating JMS in the cloud |
Eric Johnson |
2010-03-23 |
|
ACTION-154 |
closed |
Investigate IBM's legal position in sharing or using IBM product test suites in interops tests |
Mark Phillips |
2010-03-23 |
|
ACTION-155 |
closed |
Check that we have coverage of all non-WSDL assertions if we do not run the WSDL tests |
Phil Adams |
2010-03-23 |
|
ACTION-156 |
closed |
Come uo with counter proposal for issue 31 (isFault) |
Eric Johnson |
2010-03-23 |
|
ACTION-157 |
closed |
Propose an alternate proposal to resolve issue 30 |
Phil Adams |
2010-04-06 |
|
ACTION-158 |
closed |
Make proposed changes for issue-32 and issue-33 |
Phil Adams |
2010-04-13 |
|
ACTION-159 |
closed |
Apply the resolutions to issue 30, 31, 32, and 33 |
Phil Adams |
2010-04-20 |
|
ACTION-160 |
closed |
Implement the test coverage proposals |
Phil Adams |
2010-04-20 |
|
ACTION-161 |
closed |
Re-apply resolution of Issue 31 as per agreed April 13 |
Phil Adams |
2010-05-04 |
|
ACTION-162 |
closed |
Define 2 new test cases for isFault |
Eric Johnson |
2010-05-04 |
|
ACTION-163 |
closed |
Contact people who are committing changes related to SOAP/JMS for the Apache CXF project |
Peter Easton |
2010-05-18 |
|
ACTION-164 |
closed |
Look at CXF samples and text, and report back to group at how to assess the coverage vs. SOAP/JMS test suite. |
Peter Easton |
2010-05-11 |
|
ACTION-165 |
closed |
Look at test suite coverage of existing CXF. |
Peter Easton |
2010-05-11 |
|
ACTION-166 |
closed |
Update the URI RFC and republish, then resubmit to IETF review mailing list |
Eric Johnson |
2010-05-18 |
|
ACTION-167 |
closed |
Talk to Yves about possibility of making WSDL 2.0 section non-normative |
Eric Johnson |
2010-05-18 |
|
ACTION-168 |
closed |
Develop a more detailed proposal for issue 34 |
Peter Easton |
2010-05-25 |
|
ACTION-169 |
closed |
Apply resolutions for Issues 35-37 |
Peter Easton |
2010-05-25 |
|
ACTION-170 |
closed |
Raise an Issue proposing the move of the WSDL 2 section to the appendix |
Eric Johnson |
2010-05-25 |
|
ACTION-171 |
closed |
Contact Glen Daniels with invitation to review the SOAP/JMS URI |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-01 |
|
ACTION-172 |
closed |
Track down original JMS contributors |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-01 |
|
ACTION-173 |
closed |
Enquire in IBM about who to contact amongst JMS contributors |
Mark Phillips |
2010-06-01 |
|
ACTION-174 |
closed |
Send some reference links to the mailin list to support this proposal |
Peter Easton |
2010-06-01 |
|
ACTION-175 |
closed |
Clarify the test description for test 1003 |
Peter Easton |
2010-06-08 |
|
ACTION-176 |
closed |
Re-write the explicit proposal for Issue 34 |
Peter Easton |
2010-06-08 |
|
ACTION-177 |
closed |
Update the spec with the resolution to issue 34 |
Peter Easton |
2010-06-15 |
|
ACTION-178 |
closed |
Make a proposal for issue 38 (WSDL 2.0 section) |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-15 |
|
ACTION-179 |
closed |
Update URI editors spec to reflect latest URI scheme URL |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-22 |
|
ACTION-180 |
closed |
Raise issue for use of "m:MaxTime" XML in SOAP 1.2 example from section 2.8 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-22 |
|
ACTION-181 |
closed |
Fix broken link on landing page |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-29 |
|
ACTION-182 |
closed |
Check how much of the binding spec. needs to change and make a proposal |
Mark Phillips |
2010-06-29 |
|
ACTION-183 |
closed |
Apply resolution to issue 38 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-29 |
|
ACTION-184 |
closed |
Apply resolution to issue 38 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-06-29 |
|
ACTION-185 |
closed |
Change the namespace to http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms |
Mark Phillips |
2010-07-06 |
|
ACTION-186 |
closed |
Review the spec. looking for other items that will need to change - e.g. editorial notes / nits |
Eric Johnson |
2010-07-06 |
|
ACTION-187 |
closed |
Review the spec. looking for other items that will need to change - e.g. editorial notes / nits |
Derek Rokicki |
2010-07-06 |
|
ACTION-188 |
closed |
Apply the resolution to issue 39 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-07-06 |
|
ACTION-189 |
closed |
Apply resolution for issue 40 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-07-06 |
|
ACTION-190 |
closed |
Review the test cases once the changes for issue 39 have been applied |
Eric Johnson |
2010-07-06 |
|
ACTION-191 |
closed |
Raise an issue regarding targetService and the missing fault |
Derek Rokicki |
2010-07-13 |
|
ACTION-192 |
closed |
Send list of known JMS URI formats to the SOAP/JMS list |
Mark Phillips |
2010-07-13 |
|
ACTION-193 |
closed |
Investigate provisional uri process and how we would move forward after that |
Eric Johnson |
2010-07-13 |
|
ACTION-194 |
closed |
Apply the resolutions to Issues 41-46 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-07-20 |
|
ACTION-195 |
closed |
Propose an alternative resolution to issue 50 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-08-03 |
Missing SOAP 1.1 indication |
ACTION-196 |
closed |
Apply resolutions for the resolved issues above |
Eric Johnson |
2010-08-03 |
|
ACTION-197 |
closed |
Create an alternate proposal for issue-55 resolution |
Phil Adams |
2010-08-10 |
redundant statements about one-way MEP |
ACTION-198 |
closed |
Update test cases per issue-59 suggestion |
Peter Easton |
2010-08-10 |
|
ACTION-199 |
closed |
Review the proposal for issue 48 and make a counter proposal if he does not agree |
Mark Phillips |
2010-08-24 |
|
ACTION-200 |
closed |
Apply the changes for issue 50 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-08-24 |
|
ACTION-201 |
closed |
Apply the resolutions for issues 56, 57, 58 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-08-24 |
References section a big blob |
ACTION-202 |
closed |
Investigate the necessary steps for completing CR and moving to PR |
Eric Johnson |
2010-08-24 |
|
ACTION-203 |
closed |
Check the SOAP encoding in the test cases once the issues are resolved |
Phil Adams |
2010-08-31 |
|
ACTION-204 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for issue 48 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-08-31 |
unflagged message body assertions |
ACTION-205 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for issue 55 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-08-31 |
redundant statements about one-way MEP |
ACTION-206 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for the issue described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0016.html |
Eric Johnson |
2010-08-31 |
lacking complete WSDL example |
ACTION-207 |
closed |
Finish proposal for issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0017.html |
Mark Phillips |
2010-08-31 |
SOAP samples problems |
ACTION-208 |
closed |
Raise two formal issues for the soapAction and targetService faults |
Derek Rokicki |
2010-09-07 |
|
ACTION-209 |
closed |
Apply the proposal for issue 61 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-09-07 |
|
ACTION-210 |
closed |
Check to XOP examples to validate this |
Mark Phillips |
2010-09-21 |
|
ACTION-211 |
closed |
Apply the proposals for Issues 62 and 63 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-09-21 |
|
ACTION-212 |
closed |
Begin the CR process by modifying the spec. to reflect the candidate status etc. |
Mark Phillips |
2010-09-21 |
|
ACTION-213 |
closed |
Prepare disposition of comments document |
Eric Johnson |
2010-09-28 |
|
ACTION-214 |
closed |
Raise JIRA on CXF for latest fault code spec. changes |
Peter Easton |
2010-09-28 |
|
ACTION-215 |
closed |
Respond to question about encoding of white space in parameters |
Eric Johnson |
2010-09-28 |
|
ACTION-216 |
closed |
Apply the proposal for issue 64 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-10-12 |
|
ACTION-217 |
closed |
Send Yves a link to the disposition of comments |
Eric Johnson |
2010-10-19 |
|
ACTION-218 |
closed |
Report back to the group on options for IANA registration of JMS variants |
Eric Johnson |
2010-10-26 |
|
ACTION-219 |
closed |
Check the test cases are up to date |
Peter Easton |
2010-11-09 |
|
ACTION-220 |
closed |
Review the FAQ |
Eric Johnson |
2010-11-09 |
|
ACTION-221 |
closed |
Send some orientation material on getting started and running CXF SOAP/JMS tests to Phil |
Peter Easton |
2010-11-09 |
|
ACTION-222 |
closed |
Review the CXF tests to see if they can be tested against a Software AG implementation |
Derek Rokicki |
2010-11-09 |
|
ACTION-223 |
closed |
Look into building and running the CXF tests against WAS |
Phil Adams |
2010-11-09 |
|
ACTION-224 |
closed |
Raise issue on items 2 and 3 of Peter's testing action-219 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-11-16 |
|
ACTION-225 |
closed |
Apply Action-219 changes to test spec |
Peter Easton |
2010-11-16 |
|
ACTION-226 |
closed |
Open issue on EXI mail exchange |
Eric Johnson |
2010-11-16 |
|
ACTION-227 |
closed |
Raise issue on the SOAP/JMS namespace distinction between SOAP 1.1 and 1.2 and present proposal |
Phil Adams |
2010-11-16 |
|
ACTION-228 |
closed |
Come up with a proposal for Issue-65 |
Eric Johnson |
2010-11-23 |
|
ACTION-229 |
closed |
Come up with a proposal for Issue-65 |
Phil Adams |
2010-11-23 |
|
ACTION-230 |
closed |
Apply the changes for ISSUE-67 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-07 |
SOAP-JMS Binding specification |
ACTION-231 |
closed |
Come up with a concrete proposal to resolve issue 68 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-07 |
|
ACTION-232 |
closed |
Revise the proposal with Amy's addition and the fault in the proposal |
Eric Johnson |
2010-12-07 |
|
ACTION-233 |
closed |
Forward proposal for ISSUE-65 to CXF folk for their approval |
Peter Easton |
2010-12-14 |
|
ACTION-234 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for ISSUE-68 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-14 |
|
ACTION-235 |
closed |
Get details of potential BytesMessageproblem |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-14 |
|
ACTION-236 |
closed |
Apply the resolution as written in the chat |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-28 |
|
ACTION-237 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for ISSUE-65 |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-28 |
|
ACTION-238 |
closed |
Roll back incorrectly applied changes to CR |
Mark Phillips |
2010-12-28 |
|
ACTION-239 |
closed |
Raise new issue to clarify requirements around which message types must be supported. |
Derek Rokicki |
2011-01-11 |
|
ACTION-240 |
closed |
Apply the resolution for ISSUE-70 |
Eric Johnson |
2011-01-18 |
|
ACTION-241 |
closed |
Rewrite sentence in URI scheme abstract that the commenter pointed out. |
Eric Johnson |
2011-01-25 |
|
ACTION-242 |
closed |
Clarify with Yves the criteria needed for PR vs. Rec |
Eric Johnson |
2011-02-08 |
|
ACTION-243 |
closed |
Tofind out what TIBCOare doing with Websphere (re: compatibility testing and latest versions) |
Eric Johnson |
2011-02-08 |
|
ACTION-244 |
closed |
Investigate whether CXF supports WSDL |
Eric Johnson |
2011-02-15 |
|
ACTION-245 |
closed |
Check with Yves if we could allow only one implementation of the optional WSDL part |
Eric Johnson |
2011-03-01 |
|
ACTION-246 |
closed |
Produce a complete version of the test results template |
Mark Phillips |
2011-03-15 |
|
ACTION-247 |
closed |
Review testcases to remove or re-classify the testcases that are not required for compliance |
Matthew Golby-Kirk |
2011-05-03 |
|
ACTION-248 |
closed |
Apply a resolution to ISSUE-27 ( update the Spec. with final RFC) |
Eric Johnson |
2011-05-10 |
|
ACTION-249 |
closed |
Investigae and fix the corruption in the change log |
Mark Phillips |
2011-05-31 |
|
ACTION-250 |
closed |
Follow up with Yves about PR |
Eric Johnson |
2011-07-26 |
|
ACTION-251 |
closed |
Start preparing the PR document |
Eric Johnson |
2011-08-16 |
|
ACTION-252 |
closed |
Run the proposed PR draft through the pubrules checker |
Mark Phillips |
2011-08-30 |
|
ACTION-253 |
closed |
Come up with a proposal for the status of the document (SOTD) text (in collaboration with Yves ) |
Derek Rokicki |
2011-08-30 |
|
ACTION-254 |
closed |
Figure out why the 2011 PR link says "public review" instead of "proposed recommendation" |
Eric Johnson |
2011-08-30 |
|
ACTION-255 |
closed |
Investigate level of testing between WAS and WebSphere Message Broker |
Mark Phillips |
2011-08-30 |
|
ACTION-256 |
closed |
Take a look at the problems in Section 1 and 3 (HTML formatting and header text) |
Eric Johnson |
2011-11-02 |
|
ACTION-257 |
closed |
Take a look at the pubrules problems in Section 8 |
Eric Johnson |
2011-09-06 |
|
ACTION-258 |
closed |
Prepare a request to progress to Proposed Recommendation |
Eric Johnson |
2011-10-04 |
|
ACTION-259 |
closed |
Update the SOTD with the document Derek defined in action-253 |
Phil Adams |
2011-10-25 |
|
ACTION-260 |
closed |
Submit a request to transition to PR when required actions are complete |
Eric Johnson |
2011-11-01 |
|
ACTION-261 |
closed |
Investigate requirements to move to rec. |
Eric Johnson |
2011-12-20 |
|
ACTION-262 |
closed |
Review Matthew's email |
Derek Rokicki |
2012-02-07 |
|
ACTION-263 |
closed |
Review the Wiki on behalf of IBM |
Matthew Golby-Kirk |
2012-01-24 |
|
ACTION-264 |
closed |
Review the Wiki on behalf of TIBCO |
Eric Johnson |
2012-01-24 |
|