Input for Agenda Planning for the SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group
Open actions not associated to any issue/product
ACTION-32 on Eric Johnson: Will create at least one additional testcase - due 2008-09-16 - open
Action Items Pending Review
There are 0 pending review actions.
Overdue action items
There are 9 overdue actions.
| ID | State | Title | Person | Due Date | Associated with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTION-32 |
open | Will create at least one additional testcase | Eric Johnson | 2008-09-16 | |
| ACTION-68 |
open | Draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO for publication in an FAQ | Derek Rokicki | 2009-05-29 | |
| ACTION-108 |
open | Come up with a more concrete proposal on the wsdl testing | Eric Johnson | 2009-08-25 | |
| ACTION-112 |
open | Review test cases to identify which ones could have associated WSDL | Eric Johnson | 2009-09-15 | |
| ACTION-121 |
open | Make the changes recorded under the proposed resolution for Issue 15 | Phil Adams | 2009-11-17 | |
| ACTION-122 |
open | Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 16 | Phil Adams | 2009-11-17 | |
| ACTION-123 |
open | Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 17 | Mark Phillips | 2009-11-17 | |
| ACTION-124 |
open | Reply to Eric's email with a counter-proposal for sections 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 | Phil Adams | 2009-11-17 | |
| ACTION-125 |
open | to make the changes for Issue 18 | Mark Phillips | 2009-11-17 |
Action items due next week
There are 0 upcoming actions.
Issues discussed over the last week
There are 8 recently discussed issues listed in the system.
| ID | State | Title | Raised on | Product | Open Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISSUE-4 Protocol-2024 needs restructuring |
OPEN | Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table | 2009-07-27 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |
| ISSUE-14 WSDL conformance statements missing |
OPEN | Apparently normative statements about WSDL are not written that way. | 2009-09-29 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |
| ISSUE-15 Incorrect use of RFC keywords |
OPEN | WSDL section of spec uses RFC 2119 keywords inappropriately | 2009-09-29 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |
| ISSUE-16 non-existent "soap" prefix |
OPEN | Section 3.4.5 refers to a non-existent "soap" prefix | 2009-10-20 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |
| ISSUE-17 References to RFC 3987 |
OPEN | References to RFC 3987 are incorrect, not consistent with expected use | 2009-10-26 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |
| ISSUE-18 consistency of references, acronyms |
OPEN | consistency of references, acronyms | 2009-10-26 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |
| ISSUE-19 3001, 3002, 3003 overlap |
OPEN | Normative statements 3001, 3002, 3003 overlap and/or are redundant | 2009-10-26 | 0 | |
| ISSUE-20 Statement 3004 lacks context, RFC 2119 keywords |
OPEN | Statement 3004 lacks context, RFC 2119 keywords | 2009-10-26 | SOAP-JMS Binding specification | 0 |