W3C | TAG | TAG Work Plan

TAG Product: Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types


The goal of this work is to describe the contradictions in the definitions between different specifications (such as media fragments and application/xml mime type definition) in the definition of fragment identifiers, to describe any changes to draft documents that are required to manage those contradictions, and to provide some general guidelines to those creating mime type definitions in the future around the interpretation of fragment identifiers.

Success criteria

Key deliverables with dates:


TAG Members assigned:

Jeni Tennison, Larry Masinter (offered to help on 3 May 2012), Henry Thompson, Yves Lafon (replacing Jonathan Rees as agreed at June 2011 F2F), Peter Linss (offered to help on 4 August 2011)

Drafts, etc.

First Public Working Draft: Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers in Media Type Definitions

Editor's Draft: Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers in Media Type Definitions

See also Jeni Tennision's 31 May 2011 E-mail (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0089.html) framing some of the issues in this area.

Discussion of this topic at June 2011 F2F

TAG Issues, Actions and Tracker Product Page



Available versions of this document:

Latest: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html

This version: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-09-26.html

Previous versions: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-05-04.html, http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-01-05.html, http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2011-08-14.html