- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:59:03 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <c276d583-69a4-a234-ff18-a5b0d0eeffb7@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2020/06/04-i18n-minutes.html
text version follows:
- DRAFT -
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
04 Jun 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Jun/0000.html
Attendees
Present
JcK, addison, Richard, Bert, atsushi, fsasaki, fuqiao
Regrets
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
addison
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Agenda and Minutes
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Info Share
4. [7]RADAR Review
5. [8]Next steps for simple ruby
6. [9]Line breaking should fallback to UAX14 in absence
of other rules #5068
7. [10]Specdev Health Warning
8. [11]AOB?
* [12]Summary of Action Items
* [13]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
trackbot, prepare teleconference
<agendabot> clear agenda
<scribe> scribenick: addison
Agenda and Minutes
Action Items
[14]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[14] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
action-901?
<trackbot> action-901 -- Richard Ishida to Raise issue 91
against css-text if that's appropriate -- due 2020-05-14 --
OPEN
<trackbot>
[15]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/901
[15] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/901
richard: it's appropriate
<r12a> [16]https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5068
[16] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5068
close action-901
<trackbot> Closed action-901.
richard: have response. thinks it's appropriate, think we can
close
action-914?
<trackbot> action-914 -- Fuqiao Xue to Publish current version
of specdev to tr -- due 2020-06-04 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[17]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/914
[17] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/914
close action-914
<trackbot> Closed action-914.
action-915?
<trackbot> action-915 -- Addison Phillips to Update
bp-i18n-specdev pr41 for further consideration next week -- due
2020-06-04 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[18]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/915
[18] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/915
close action-915
<trackbot> Closed action-915.
Info Share
RADAR Review
[19]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
[19] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
[20]https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
[20] https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
richard: had an info share
<r12a> [21]https://r12a.github.io/scripts/featurelist/
[21] https://r12a.github.io/scripts/featurelist/
richard: that page significantly rewritten
... more languages and more data in it
... shows various features that language+script combo has
... high level distinctive features
... click column at top to order by column
[22]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is
%3Aopen+label%3Apending
[22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:pending
Next steps for simple ruby
<r12a> [23]https://w3c.github.io/simple-ruby/
[23] https://w3c.github.io/simple-ruby/
richard: getting closer to publishing simple-ruby
... would anyone like an explanation?
... jlreq is about to be republished in a slightly new format
... some things are missing from jlreq
... there are too many things in some cases
<xfq_> [24]http://w3c.github.io/jlreq/
[24] http://w3c.github.io/jlreq/
richard: ruby has many potential ways of doing thing
... advanced features or too much for the web
... or equally valid but which to choose?
... idea frompub lab was "here's a low level baseline"
... here are alteratnives available, good for interop
... was distilled into this document
... not long
... started to make some noise about it, but now they are happy
for us to proceed to fpwd
... issue call for wide review
... to be published as note
... is the working group happy to issue fpwd?
<Bert> +1
+1
<xfq_> +1
<fsasaki> +1
<r12a> +1
<atsushi> +1
RESOLUTION: publish simple-ruby as fpwd
richard: WG okay with call for wide review?
... want to keep wide review short
... set a 1 week review period
... target note resolution on 18th
atsushi: reference to jlreq is pending
richard: can publish fpwd any time, work in parallel on issues
... should also work on jlreq
addison: when bring that forward?
... what versioning? wg review?
Line breaking should fallback to UAX14 in absence of other rules
#5068
<r12a> [25]https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5068
[25] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5068
richard: this is the old chestnut
... in css we provide suggestions about japanese and chinese in
a tailored way\
... what happens if you don't have tailoring? use uax14?
... and there are certain things out there and tests that show
lack of basic impl
... we raised in github and florian responded
... now have clause in css and css requires unicode conformance
... and that means uax14 is in the mix
... uax14 provides baseline with further tailoring expectations
addison: so they'll add that edit?
richard: think so
addison: sounds like we're good with it
<xfq> +1 to florian's suggestion
<scribe> ACTION: richard: reply to issue css 5068 on behalf of
i18n saying we're satisified with the edit proposed
<trackbot> Created ACTION-917 - Reply to issue css 5068 on
behalf of i18n saying we're satisified with the edit proposed
[on Richard Ishida - due 2020-06-11].
Specdev Health Warning
[26]https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/pull/41
[26] https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/pull/41
[27]https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/41/
cdbf6d5...aphillips:bef2364.html
[27] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/41/cdbf6d5...aphillips:bef2364.html
[28]https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/41/
cdbf6d5...aphillips:bef2364.html#text_n11n
[28] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/41/cdbf6d5...aphillips:bef2364.html#text_n11n
Specifications SHOULD include an appropriate note or warning
about normalization
also: such things are -> such things as
AOB?
MUSTard
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: richard: reply to issue css 5068 on behalf of
i18n saying we're satisified with the edit proposed
Summary of Resolutions
1. [29]publish simple-ruby as fpwd
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2020 15:59:08 UTC