trackbot, prepare teleconference
<agendabot> clear agenda
<scribe> scribenick: addison
https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
action-901?
<trackbot> action-901 -- Richard Ishida to Raise issue 91 against css-text if that's appropriate -- due 2020-05-14 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/901
richard: it's appropriate
<r12a> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5068
close action-901
<trackbot> Closed action-901.
richard: have response. thinks it's appropriate, think we can close
action-914?
<trackbot> action-914 -- Fuqiao Xue to Publish current version of specdev to tr -- due 2020-06-04 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/914
close action-914
<trackbot> Closed action-914.
action-915?
<trackbot> action-915 -- Addison Phillips to Update bp-i18n-specdev pr41 for further consideration next week -- due 2020-06-04 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/915
close action-915
<trackbot> Closed action-915.
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
richard: had an info share
<r12a> https://r12a.github.io/scripts/featurelist/
richard: that page significantly
rewritten
... more languages and more data in it
... shows various features that language+script combo has
... high level distinctive features
... click column at top to order by column
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Apending
<r12a> https://w3c.github.io/simple-ruby/
richard: getting closer to
publishing simple-ruby
... would anyone like an explanation?
... jlreq is about to be republished in a slightly new
format
... some things are missing from jlreq
... there are too many things in some cases
<xfq_> http://w3c.github.io/jlreq/
richard: ruby has many potential
ways of doing thing
... advanced features or too much for the web
... or equally valid but which to choose?
... idea frompub lab was "here's a low level baseline"
... here are alteratnives available, good for interop
... was distilled into this document
... not long
... started to make some noise about it, but now they are happy
for us to proceed to fpwd
... issue call for wide review
... to be published as note
... is the working group happy to issue fpwd?
<Bert> +1
+1
<xfq_> +1
<fsasaki> +1
<r12a> +1
<atsushi> +1
RESOLUTION: publish simple-ruby as fpwd
richard: WG okay with call for
wide review?
... want to keep wide review short
... set a 1 week review period
... target note resolution on 18th
atsushi: reference to jlreq is pending
richard: can publish fpwd any
time, work in parallel on issues
... should also work on jlreq
addison: when bring that
forward?
... what versioning? wg review?
<r12a> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5068
richard: this is the old
chestnut
... in css we provide suggestions about japanese and chinese in
a tailored way\
... what happens if you don't have tailoring? use uax14?
... and there are certain things out there and tests that show
lack of basic impl
... we raised in github and florian responded
... now have clause in css and css requires unicode
conformance
... and that means uax14 is in the mix
... uax14 provides baseline with further tailoring
expectations
addison: so they'll add that edit?
richard: think so
addison: sounds like we're good with it
<xfq> +1 to florian's suggestion
<scribe> ACTION: richard: reply to issue css 5068 on behalf of i18n saying we're satisified with the edit proposed
<trackbot> Created ACTION-917 - Reply to issue css 5068 on behalf of i18n saying we're satisified with the edit proposed [on Richard Ishida - due 2020-06-11].
https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/pull/41
https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/41/cdbf6d5...aphillips:bef2364.html
Specifications SHOULD include an appropriate note or warning about normalization
also: such things are -> such things as
MUSTard
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/fro /from/ Succeeded: s/warning/note or warning/ Present: JcK addison Richard Bert atsushi fsasaki fuqiao Found ScribeNick: addison Inferring Scribes: addison Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Jun/0000.html Found Date: 04 Jun 2020 People with action items: reply richard WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]