ISSUE-8: How much to define the review requirements for transitions

wide review

How much to define the review requirements for transitions

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile
Opened on:
2013-06-10
Description:
[substantive]

How (and how much) should we define the review required for transitions?

Chaals' draft proposal for a new chapter 7 [1] has a transition requirement that the WG SHOULD "show evidence of wide review". Should that be more clearly defined? If so, what should we say?

[1] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/2013/06/05/a-proposal-for-a-new-recommendation-track/
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: What is "wide review" (from jeff@w3.org on 2013-07-12)
  2. Re: What is "wide review" (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-07-12)

Related notes:

[Ralph]: same as issue-9

13 Jun 2013, 08:51:53

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 8.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:50:18 carcone Exp $