ISSUE-66: Elimination of LC or combining LC and CR creates new problems
Ch7-Please-Dont-Create-New-Problems
Elimination of LC or combining LC and CR creates new problems
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
- Raised by:
- Arthur Barstow
- Opened on:
- 2013-11-27
- Description:
- See:
[[
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Nov/0068.html>
* In practice, I don't think the elimination of LC or combining LC and
CR [depending on how one spins the gist of the proposal] provides a
significant improvement, and as I stated last June, it appears to just
create a bunch of new issues. F.ex. it appears a new process will be
needed re "what is Wide Review, how are Reviews done, who is responsible
for doing what" (which, IMHO is precisely the point of LC as defined in
Process-20051022).
]]
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] and summary of 13 January 2014 Revising W3C Process Community Group Teleconference (from coralie@w3.org on 2014-01-13)
- w3process-ISSUE-66 (Ch7-Please-Dont-Create-New-Problems): Elimination of LC or combining LC and CR creates new problems [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-11-27)
Related notes:
[koalie]: see action-26 on elika to Describe experiment of wide-review
13 Jan 2014, 17:02:02RESOLVED: Closed in favor of Issue 83 which has a more specific proposal for solving the problem raised with this issue.
See the minutes of the 13 Jan 2014 Process TF meeting.
Display change log
