ISSUE-35: Clarify "base" document for Technical Reports change requests

Clarify "base" document for Technical Reports change requests

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Arthur Barstow
Opened on:
2013-07-08
Description:
The first order problem is that it is not clear which document should be used as the basis for change requests for the Technical Reports process. It appears there are at least two candidates:

1. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html

2. Chaals' document

After that is clarified, the canonical document must be placed in some type of source code control system that facilitates creating and proposing patches. My preference is to use GitHub so PRs can be used. W3C's Hg/Mercurial would be second preference. Please do NOT use CVS.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: w3process-ISSUE-35: Clarify "base" document for Technical Reports change requests [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-07-08)
  2. w3process-ISSUE-35: Clarify "base" document for Technical Reports change requests [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-07-08)

Related notes:

The relevant document is https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/tr.html (but nothing stops you referring to the current active chapter 7 - or anything else).

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile, 18 Jul 2013, 23:40:07

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 35.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:49:57 carcone Exp $