ISSUE-28: Scope of review (wide, effective public review)

Scope of review (wide, effective public review)

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Jeff Jaffe
Opened on:
2013-06-10
Description:
22. In 7.4.5 Publication of a W3C Recommendation, Bullet 2 calls for “the document being available for effective public review” How does this differ from “Wide Review”? How does this differ from the General Requirements for Advancement? (Jeff, Steve)
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Re: What is "wide review" (from jeff@w3.org on 2013-07-12)
  2. Re: What is "wide review" (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-07-12)
  3. Re: tracker - please use it Re: List of issues on Chapter 7. (from karl@la-grange.net on 2013-06-10)

Related notes:

Chaals has added text to the section on general requirements for transition describing "widely reviewed", and harmonised all the requirements for wide review to refer to that, in draft https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/d97b11a76ac4/tr.html 2013-07-09

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile, 18 Jul 2013, 23:38:29

[koalie]: keeping open till editor ensures clerical errors are fixed throughout

17 Sep 2013, 16:24:08

*believed* fixed for next draft

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile, 17 Sep 2013, 16:35:45

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 28.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:49:54 carcone Exp $