ISSUE-16: Documenting significant editorial changes and conformance
Documenting significant editorial changes and conformance
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
- Raised by:
- Jeff Jaffe
- Opened on:
- 2013-06-10
- Description:
- In “SHOULD (was must for CR+ in 7.2) provide public documentation of significant editorial changes to the technical report since the previous step.” Two issues
a. Should this be a MUST or SHOULD? (Ralph)
b. Only significant changes or all changes? (Jeff 2) - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: tracker - please use it Re: List of issues on Chapter 7. (from karl@la-grange.net on 2013-06-10)
Related notes:
13-June resolution:
SHOULD for editorial changes
MUST for substantive changes
From 12 Aug AB meeting:
Steve: We can close 16 with the assumption that the change recommended for 15 will be made.
Display change log
