ISSUE-114: Review period for charter extensions

CharterExtensionReview

Review period for charter extensions

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Steve Zilles
Opened on:
2014-08-26
Description:
Section 5.2 Advisory Committee Review of an Activity Proposal has the following,
"The review period [for an Activity extension] MUST be at least four weeks."

Issue: Keep four week requirement for charter review (probably yes)?

Suggested Resolution:
Charter extensions should not be given an AC Review, but should be appealable by AC Members. This makes the lenght of the Review period moot. If AC Review is desired, then 4 weeks [the normal AC review period timing] is the correct time.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Summary of Resolutions re Process 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-13)
  2. w3process-ISSUE-114 (CharterExtensionReview): Review period for charter extensions (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-08-26)

Related notes:

Closed as moot with the resolution of Issue 113

Steve Zilles, 26 Aug 2014, 14:33:03

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 114.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:49:17 carcone Exp $