Copyright © 2025-2026 World Wide Web Consortium. W3C® liability, trademark and permissive document license rules apply.
This document defines SHACL Rules.
SHACL, the Shapes Constraint Language, is a language for describing the structure of RDF graphs. SHACL may be used for a variety of purposes such as validating, inferencing, modeling domains, generating ontologies to inform other agents, building user interfaces, generating code, and integrating data.
SHACL Rules provides inferencing with the generation of new RDF data from a combination of a set of rules and a base data graph. Rules can be expressed as RDF or in the SHACL Rules Language (SRL).
This specification is published by the Data Shapes Working Group.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C standards and drafts index.
This document was published by the Data Shapes Working Group as a Working Draft using the Recommendation track.
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by W3C and its Members.
This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than a work in progress. Future updates to this upcoming Recommendation may incorporate new features.
This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent that the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
This document is governed by the 18 August 2025 W3C Process Document.
This specification is part of the SHACL 1.2 family of specifications. See the SHACL 1.2 Overview for a more detailed introduction to them.
The specifications are as follows:
Implementers can partially check their level of conformance with the above specifications by successfully passing the test cases of the SHACL 1.2 test suite. Note, however, that passing all the tests in the test suite does not imply complete conformance to the specifications. It only implies that the implementation conforms to the aspects tested by the test suite.
This document introduces the concept of inference rules for SHACL 1.2, a mechanism for deriving new RDF triples from existing data using declarative rules defined in shapes graphs. This extends SHACL’s capabilities beyond validation, enabling reasoning and data enrichment.
This document complements other SHACL 1.2 specifications, such as SHACL Core, by defining the syntax and semantics of rule-based inference. While SHACL Core focuses on constraint validation, the SHACL Rules specification provides a standardized way to express and evaluate rules that generate new data.
Connect to definitions in RDF 1.2 Concepts.
The following definitions from other specifications are used in this document: @@
Some examples in this document use Turtle [turtle]. The reader is expected to be familiar with SHACL [shacl] and SPARQL [sparql-query].
Within this document, the following namespace prefix bindings are used:
| Prefix | Namespace |
|---|---|
rdf: |
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# |
rdfs: |
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# |
sh: |
http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl# |
shrl: |
http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-rules# |
shnex: |
http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-node-expr# |
xsd: |
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# |
ex: |
http://example.com/ |
Throughout the document, color-coded boxes containing RDF graphs in Turtle will appear. These fragments of Turtle documents use the prefix bindings given above.
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
TODO
RFC 2119 language should be automatically inserted here.
SHACL rules infer new triples. The input is a data graph and a set of rules. The output is a graph of inferred triples that do not occur in the data graph.
:A :fatherOf :X .
:B :motherOf :X .
:C :motherOf :A .
RULE { ?x :childOf ?y } WHERE { ?y :fatherOf ?x }
RULE { ?x :childOf ?y } WHERE { ?y :motherOf ?x }
RULE { ?x :descendedFrom ?y } WHERE { ?x :childOf ?y }
RULE { ?x :descendedFrom ?y } WHERE { ?x :childOf ?z . ?z :childOf ?y }
The above rules, applied to the data, will conclude
that: :X is the :childOf :A and :B, and that :X is :descendedFrom :C.
RULE { ?x :ancestorOf ?y } WHERE { ?y :descendedFrom ?x }
RULE { ?a :ancestorOf ?b } WHERE { ?a :ancestorOf ?c . ?c :ancestorOf ?b }
# Default value - calculate a name
RULE { ?x :name ?FN } WHERE {
?x rdf:type :Person
NOT { ?x :name ?someName }
?x :givenName ?name1 ;
:familyName ?name2 .
BIND(concat(?name1, " ", ?name2) AS ?FN)
}
IMPORTS
Generating new terms without restriction can lead to unbounded
inferred triples. There are function-like forms that do not have
repeatable results: BNODE, UUID. Blank nodes in the rule head
behave like SPARQL CONSTRUCT. Assignment can be used to have an
incrementing counter.
At risk:
Rule tuples are workspace elements and are disjoint from triples. They are tuples of RDF terms (no variables).
Syntax of tuple patterns, templates and tuples:
TUPLE(termOrVar , ...)$(termOrVar , ...)Often, the first argument will be a fixed name.
There is a tuple store which holds tuples for the lifetime of the evaluation. The tuple store holds duplicate data tuples (unlike an RDF graph which is a set).
Should we include attaching SHACL (1.2) Rules to shapes? If so, what does it mean given the difference in execution semantics?
In practice, how often are constriants and AF-rules written on the same shape? If they are, how are the rules being used, in practice, to influence the validation?
Sketch:
[] rdf:type sh:NodeShape ;
sh:rule ## Different property?
[ a srl:SHACLRule ;
srl:ruleSet "..."; ## SRL syntax
sh:prefixes ... ;
];
[] rdf:type sh:NodeShape ;
sh:rule
[ a srl:SHACLRule ;
srl:ruleSet [ ... RDF syntax ... ] ;
];
The Shape Rules Abstract Syntax
An expression is a function, or functional form. It's arguments are RDF terms. An expression is evaluated with respect to a solution mapping to give an RDF term as the result. Expressions are compatible with SHACL list parameter functions and with SPARQL expressions.
In a triple pattern or a triple template, position 1 of the tuple is informally called the subject, position 2 is informally called the predicate, and position 3 is informally called the object.
Well-formedness is a set of conditions on the abstract syntax of SHACL rules. Together, these conditions ensure that a variable in the head of a rule has a value defined in the body of the rule; that each variable in an condition expression or assignment expression has a value at the point of evaluation; and that each assignment in a rule introduces a new variable, one that has not been used earlier in the rule body.
A rule is a well-formed rule if all of the following conditions are met:
A rule set is "well-formed" if and only if all of the rules of the rule set are "well-formed".
R1 depends on a
rule R2 if the head of R2 can possibly generate triples that
match the triple pattern in R1.
The dependency is positive
if the triple pattern is a rule body element
and the dependency is negative if the
triple pattern appears in a negation element.
R1 depends on rule R2 if any rule element of R1
depends on R2.
The dependency is negative if any of the rule elements
have a negative dependency on R2; otherwise the dependency is
positive.
R1 has a transitive dependency on rule R2
if there is a path in the dependency graph from R1 to R2.
R has a recursive dependency if there is a cyclic path
in the dependency graph involving R.
Notes:
A triple template with components ts, tp, to
can possibly generate a triple with component RDF terms
s, p, o if
ts is a variable or ts is the
same RDF term as s,
tp is a variable or tp is the
same RDF term as p,
and
to is a variable or to is the
same RDF term as o.
In addition, if any pair of ts, tp, and to are the same variable,
then the corresponding pair of s, p, and o must be the same.
Revise
Examples:
@@ Examples of triple patttern dependencies.
@@ Examples of rule dependencies.
Stratification is the process of partitioning a rule set into an ordered sequence of stratification layers (also known as "strata", singular "stratum="), forming a stratification. Rules in lower strata are evaluated before rules in higher strata.
Stratification imposes constraints on dependencies between rules to ensure that negation elements depend only on results computed in earlier strata, guaranteeing a single, well-defined outcome from the evaluation of a rule set over a given base graph.
A stratification process may also be used to make other evaluation decisions. This document describes the necessary conditions for consistent evaluation and gives one possible way to form a stratification. Implementations need to meet the conditions described here in order to get compatible behavior but are not required to implement the algorithm as presented.
Stratification is only defined when the following condition is satisfied. If a rule set does not meet this condition, then this specification does not define the outcome of rule set evaluation.
In other words, there is no NOT used in any rule that
transitively depends on itself.
The following algorithm gives one possible stratification based solely on the rule set.
## output -- Map: Integer -> Set of rules.
define stratification(ruleSet):
let DP = Dependency graph for the rule set.
let stratumMap be a map from rule to integer
## The dependency graph should satisfy the stratification condition.
## Check unbounded work due to a violation of the stratification condition.
let limit = num rules + 1
let maxStratum = 0
## initialize stratumMap
foreach rule in ruleSet:
stratumMap.set(rule, 0)
endfor
boolean changed = true;
while changed:
changed = false;
foreach edge E in DP:
## Edge from pRule to qRule with a label
let pRule = source of edge
let qRule = destination of the edge
let label = edge label
if label == "positive" :
if stratumMap.get(pRule) < stratumMap.get(qRule) :
stratumMap.set(pRule, stratumMap.get(qRule))
changed = true;
endif
endif
if label == "negative" :
if stratumMap.get(pRule) <= stratumMap.get(qRule) :
let xStratum = 1 + stratumMap.get(qRule)
if ( xStratum > limit )
## Stratification requirement violated
error "Stratification error"
endif
stratumMap.put(pRule, xStratum)
maxStratum = max(maxStratum, xStratum)
changed = true;
endif
endif
endfor
endwhile
## Initialize the result map.
let stratumLevels be a map from integer to a set of rules
for i = 0 to maxStratum
stratumLevels.set(i, {})
endfor
## Gather rules in stratumMap with the same level number
for rule R in map stratumMap:
let stratumNum = stratumMap.get(R)
let S = {R} ∪︀ stratumLevel.get(stratumNum)
stratumLevel.set(stratumNum, S)
endfor
the result is stratumLevels
endfunction
A consequence of the stratification condition is that when a rule containing a negation element is evaluated, the data used to determine the outcome of that negation element, whether in the base graph or the inference graph, is fixed and will not change during evaluation.
There are two concrete syntaxes.
Shape Rules Language:
PREFIX : <http://example/>
DATA { :x :p 1 ; :q 2 . }
RULE { ?x :bothPositive true . }
WHERE { ?x :p ?v1 FILTER ( ?v1 > 0 ) ?x :q ?v2 FILTER ( ?v2 > 0 ) }
RULE { ?x :oneIsZero true . }
WHERE { ?x :p ?v1 ; :q ?v2 FILTER ( ( ?v1 = 0 ) || ( ?v2 = 0 ) ) }
RDF Rules syntax:
PREFIX : <http://example/>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX sh: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#>
PREFIX shrl: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-rules#>
PREFIX sparql: <http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql#>
:ruleSet-1
rdf:type shrl:RuleSet;
shrl:data (
<<( :x :p 1 )>>
<<( :x :q 2 )>>
);
shrl:ruleSet (
[
rdf:type shrl:Rule;
shrl:head (
[ shrl:subject [ shrl:var "x" ] ; shrl:predicate :bothPositive; shrl:object true ]
) ;
shrl:body (
[ shrl:subject [ shrl:var "x" ]; shrl:predicate :p; shrl:object [ shrl:var "v1" ] ]
[ shrl:expr [ sparql:greaterThan ( [ shrl:var "v1" ] 0 ) ] ]
[ shrl:subject [ shrl:var "x" ] ; shrl:predicate :q; shrl:object [ shrl:var "v2" ] ]
[ shrl:expr [ sparql:greaterThan ( [ shrl:var "v2" ] 0 ) ] ]
);
]
[
rdf:type shrl:Rule;
shrl:head (
[ shrl:subject [ shrl:var "x" ] ; shrl:predicate :oneIsZero ; shrl:object true ]
) ;
shrl:body (
[ shrl:subject [ shrl:var "x" ] ; shrl:predicate :p ; shrl:object [ shrl:var "v1" ] ]
[ shrl:subject [ shrl:var "x" ] ; shrl:predicate :q ; shrl:object [ shrl:var "v2" ] ]
[ shrl:expr [ sparql:function-or (
[ sparql:equals ( [ shrl:var "v1" ] 0 ) ]
[ sparql:equals ( [ shrl:var "v2" ] 0 ) ]
) ]
]
);
]
) .
The grammar is given below.
Mapping the AST to the abstract syntax.
Additional helpers (short-hand abbreviations):
These allow for well-known rule patterns and also specialised implementations in basic engines.
TRANSITIVE(uri)SYMMETRIC(uri)INVERSE(uri)Vocabulary: shacl-rules.ttl.
Well-formedness:
Describe how the abstract model maps to triples.
Process : accumulators, bottom up/ Walk the structure.
All triples not in the syntax are ignored. No other "shrl:" predicates are allowed (??).
This section defines the outcome of evaluating a rule set on given data. It does not prescribe the algorithm as the method of implementation. An implementation can use any algorithm that generates the same outcome.
Inputs: data graph G, called the base graph, and a rule set RS.
Output: an RDF graph GI of inferred triples
The inferred triples do not include triples present in the set of triples of the base graph.
μ : V → T,
where V is the set of all variables
and T is the set of all RDF terms.
The domain of μ is denoted
by dom(μ), and it is the subset
of V for which μ is defined. We use the term
solution where it is clear that a solution mapping is meant.
Write μ0 for the solution mapping such that
dom(μ0) is the empty set.
subst(μ, triple pattern)
that returns a triple pattern
where each occurrence in the triple pattern of a variable that is in the
dom(μ)
is replaced by the RDF term given by the
solution mapping for var.
If the triple pattern result has no variables, then it is an RDF Triple.
Let G be an RDF graph and TP be a triple pattern.
The function graphMatch(G, TP) returns a set of all possible
solutions that,
when applied to the triple pattern, produce a triple that is in the
evaluation graph
Let G be an RDF graph and TP be a triple pattern.
graphMatch(G, TP) = { μ | subst(μ, TP) is a triple in G }
Let S1 and S2 be solutions.
compatible(μ1, μ2) = true
if forall v in dom(μ1) intersection dom(μ2)
μ1(v) = μ2(v)
compatible(μ1, μ2) = false otherwise
merge(μ1, μ2) = { μ |
μ(v) = μ1(v) if v in dom(μ1)
μ(v) = μ2(v) otherwise }
merge(S1, S2) = { μ |
μ1 in S1, μ2 in S2
and compatible(μ1, μ2)
μ(v) = merge(μ1, μ2)
Say the domain is dom(S1) ∪︀ dom(S2).
Say that two solutions that have no variables in common are compatible.
Sketch
@@ Reference SPARQL expression evaluation Expression Evaluation
@@ Reference SPARQL EBV Effective Boolean Value (EBV)
define evalFunction(F, μ):
Let [x/μ] be
if x is an RDF term, then [x/row] is x
if x is a variable, then [x/row] is μ(x)
## By well-formedness, it is an error if x is not in the row.
eval(F(expr1, expr2 ...), row) = F(eval(expr1, row), eval(expr2, row), ...)
eval(FF(expr1, expr2) , row) = ... things that are not functions like `IF`
let R be a well-formed rule.
let rule R = (H, B) where
H is the sequence of triple templates in the head
B is the sequence of triple patterns,
condition expressions, negation elements,
and assignments in the body
# Solution sequence of one solution that does not map any variables.
let SEQ0: Solution sequence = { μ0 }
let G = evaluation graph
# Evaluate rule body
# This function returns a sequence of solutions
define evalRuleElements(B, SEQ, G):
for each rule element rElt in B:
if rElt is a triple pattern TP:
X = graphMatch(G, TP)
SEQ1 = {}
for each μ1 in X:
for each μ2 in SEQ:
if compatible(μ1, μ2)
μ3 = merge(μ1, μ2)
add μ3 to SEQ1
endif
endfor
endfor
if rElt is a condition expression with expression F:
SEQ1 = {}
for each solution μ in SEQ:
if evalFunction(F, μ) is true:
add μ to SEQ1
endif
endfor
endif
if rElt is a negation expression with body elements N:
SEQ1 = {}
for each solution μ in SEQ:
S = sequence{ μ }
NEG = evalRuleElements(N, S, G)
if NEG is empty
add μ to SEQ1
endif
endfor
endif
if rElt is an assignment with variable V and expression expr
SEQ1 = {}
for each solution S in SEQ:
let x = eval(expr, S)
add(V, x) to S
add S to SEQ1
endfor
endif
if SEQ1 is empty
SEQ = {}
return SEQ
endif
SEQ = SEQ1
endfor
return SEQ
enddefine
let SEQ = evalRuleElements(B, SEQ0, G)
# Evaluate rule head
let H = empty set
for each μ in SEQ:
let S = {}
for each triple template TT in head
let triple = subst(μ, TT)
Add triple to S
endfor
H = H union S
endfor
result eval(R, G) is H
Note that H may contain triples that are also in the data graph.
let G0 be the input base graph
let RS be the rule set
let D be the graph of all DATA triples in RS
Apply stratification to RS
let L be the sequence of layers after stratification
# Inference graph
let GI = { t ∈ D | t ∉ in G0 }
# Evaluation graph.
let GE = G0 ∪︀ D
for each layer in L:
let finished = false
while !finished:
finished = true
for each rule in layer:
let X = eval(rule, GE)
let Y = { t ∈ X | t ∉ in GE }
if Y is not empty:
finished = false
GI = Y ∪︀ GI
GE = Y ∪︀ GE
endif
endfor
endwhile
endfor
the result is GI
[1] |
RuleSet |
::= | RuleOrDataBlock |
[2] |
RuleOrDataBlock |
::= | Prologue ( ( Rule | Data )+ ( Prologue1 ( Rule | Data )? )* )? |
[3] |
Prologue |
::= | Prologue1* |
[4] |
Prologue1 |
::= | BaseDecl | PrefixDecl | VersionDecl | ImportsDecl |
[5] |
BaseDecl |
::= | 'BASE' IRIREF |
[6] |
PrefixDecl |
::= | 'PREFIX' PNAME_NS IRIREF |
[7] |
VersionDecl |
::= | 'VERSION' VersionSpecifier |
[8] |
VersionSpecifier |
::= | STRING_LITERAL1 | STRING_LITERAL2 |
[9] |
ImportsDecl |
::= | 'IMPORTS' iri |
[10] |
Rule |
::= | Rule1 | Rule2 | Declaration |
[11] |
Rule1 |
::= | 'RULE' HeadTemplate 'WHERE' BodyPattern |
[12] |
Rule2 |
::= | 'IF' BodyPattern 'THEN' HeadTemplate |
[13] |
Declaration |
::= | ( 'TRANSITIVE' '(' iri ')' | 'SYMMETRIC' '(' iri ')' | 'INVERSE' '(' iri ',' iri ')' ) |
[14] |
Data |
::= | 'DATA' TriplesTemplateBlock |
[15] |
HeadTemplate |
::= | TriplesTemplateBlock |
[16] |
BodyPattern |
::= | '{' BodyPattern1 '}' |
[17] |
BodyPattern1 |
::= | BodyTriplesBlock? ( BodyNotTriples BodyTriplesBlock? )* |
[18] |
BodyNotTriples |
::= | Filter | Negation | Assignment |
[19] |
BodyTriplesBlock |
::= | TriplesBlock |
[20] |
Negation |
::= | 'NOT' '{' BodyBasic '}' |
[21] |
BodyBasic |
::= | BodyTriplesBlock? ( Filter BodyTriplesBlock? )* |
[22] |
TriplesTemplateBlock |
::= | '{' TriplesTemplate? '}' |
[23] |
TriplesTemplate |
::= | TriplesSameSubject ( '.' TriplesTemplate? )? |
[24] |
TriplesBlock |
::= | TriplesSameSubjectPath ( '.' TriplesBlock? )? |
[25] |
ReifiedTripleBlock |
::= | ReifiedTriple PropertyList |
[26] |
ReifiedTripleBlockPath |
::= | ReifiedTriple PropertyListPath |
[27] |
Assignment |
::= | 'BIND' '(' Expression 'AS' Var ')' |
[28] |
Reifier |
::= | '~' VarOrReifierId? |
[29] |
VarOrReifierId |
::= | Var | iri | BlankNode |
[30] |
Filter |
::= | 'FILTER' Constraint |
[31] |
Constraint |
::= | BrackettedExpression | BuiltInCall | FunctionCall |
[32] |
FunctionCall |
::= | iri ArgList |
[33] |
ArgList |
::= | NIL | '(' Expression ( ',' Expression )* ')' |
[34] |
ExpressionList |
::= | NIL | '(' Expression ( ',' Expression )* ')' |
[35] |
TriplesSameSubject |
::= | VarOrTerm PropertyListNotEmpty | TriplesNode PropertyList | ReifiedTripleBlock |
[36] |
PropertyList |
::= | PropertyListNotEmpty? |
[37] |
PropertyListNotEmpty |
::= | Verb ObjectList ( ';' ( Verb ObjectList )? )* |
[38] |
Verb |
::= | VarOrIri | 'a' |
[39] |
ObjectList |
::= | Object ( ',' Object )* |
[40] |
Object |
::= | GraphNode Annotation |
[41] |
TriplesSameSubjectPath |
::= | VarOrTerm PropertyListPathNotEmpty | TriplesNodePath PropertyListPath | ReifiedTripleBlockPath |
[42] |
PropertyListPath |
::= | PropertyListPathNotEmpty? |
[43] |
PropertyListPathNotEmpty |
::= | ( VerbPath | VerbSimple ) ObjectListPath ( ';' ( ( VerbPath | VerbSimple ) ObjectListPath )? )* |
[44] |
VerbPath |
::= | Path |
[45] |
VerbSimple |
::= | Var |
[46] |
ObjectListPath |
::= | ObjectPath ( ',' ObjectPath )* |
[47] |
ObjectPath |
::= | GraphNodePath AnnotationPath |
[48] |
Path |
::= | PathSequence |
[49] |
PathSequence |
::= | PathEltOrInverse ( '/' PathEltOrInverse )* |
[50] |
PathEltOrInverse |
::= | PathElt | '^' PathElt |
[51] |
PathElt |
::= | PathPrimary |
[52] |
PathPrimary |
::= | iri | 'a' | '(' Path ')' |
[53] |
TriplesNode |
::= | Collection | BlankNodePropertyList |
[54] |
BlankNodePropertyList |
::= | '[' PropertyListNotEmpty ']' |
[55] |
TriplesNodePath |
::= | CollectionPath | BlankNodePropertyListPath |
[56] |
BlankNodePropertyListPath |
::= | '[' PropertyListPathNotEmpty ']' |
[57] |
Collection |
::= | '(' GraphNode+ ')' |
[58] |
CollectionPath |
::= | '(' GraphNodePath+ ')' |
[59] |
AnnotationPath |
::= | ( Reifier | AnnotationBlockPath )* |
[60] |
AnnotationBlockPath |
::= | '{|' PropertyListPathNotEmpty '|}' |
[61] |
Annotation |
::= | ( Reifier | AnnotationBlock )* |
[62] |
AnnotationBlock |
::= | '{|' PropertyListNotEmpty '|}' |
[63] |
GraphNode |
::= | VarOrTerm | TriplesNode | ReifiedTriple |
[64] |
GraphNodePath |
::= | VarOrTerm | TriplesNodePath | ReifiedTriple |
[65] |
VarOrTerm |
::= | Var | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | BlankNode | NIL | TripleTerm |
[66] |
ReifiedTriple |
::= | '<<' ReifiedTripleSubject Verb ReifiedTripleObject Reifier? '>>' |
[67] |
ReifiedTripleSubject |
::= | Var | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | BlankNode | ReifiedTriple |
[68] |
ReifiedTripleObject |
::= | Var | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | BlankNode | ReifiedTriple | TripleTerm |
[69] |
TripleTerm |
::= | '<<(' TripleTermSubject Verb TripleTermObject ')>>' |
[70] |
TripleTermSubject |
::= | Var | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | BlankNode |
[71] |
TripleTermObject |
::= | Var | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | BlankNode | TripleTerm |
[72] |
TripleTermData |
::= | '<<(' TripleTermDataSubject ( iri | 'a' ) TripleTermDataObject ')>>' |
[73] |
TripleTermDataSubject |
::= | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral |
[74] |
TripleTermDataObject |
::= | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | TripleTermData |
[75] |
VarOrIri |
::= | Var | iri |
[76] |
Var |
::= | VAR1 | VAR2 |
[77] |
Expression |
::= | ConditionalOrExpression |
[78] |
ConditionalOrExpression |
::= | ConditionalAndExpression ( '||' ConditionalAndExpression )* |
[79] |
ConditionalAndExpression |
::= | ValueLogical ( '&&' ValueLogical )* |
[80] |
ValueLogical |
::= | RelationalExpression |
[81] |
RelationalExpression |
::= | NumericExpression ( '=' NumericExpression | '!=' NumericExpression | '<' NumericExpression | '>' NumericExpression | '<=' NumericExpression | '>=' NumericExpression | 'IN' ExpressionList | 'NOT' 'IN' ExpressionList )? |
[82] |
NumericExpression |
::= | AdditiveExpression |
[83] |
AdditiveExpression |
::= | MultiplicativeExpression ( '+' MultiplicativeExpression | '-' MultiplicativeExpression | ( NumericLiteralPositive | NumericLiteralNegative ) ( ( '*' UnaryExpression ) | ( '/' UnaryExpression ) )* )* |
[84] |
MultiplicativeExpression |
::= | UnaryExpression ( '*' UnaryExpression | '/' UnaryExpression )* |
[85] |
UnaryExpression |
::= | '!' PrimaryExpression |
[86] |
PrimaryExpression |
::= | BrackettedExpression | BuiltInCall | iriOrFunction | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | Var | ExprTripleTerm |
[87] |
ExprTripleTerm |
::= | '<<(' ExprTripleTermSubject Verb ExprTripleTermObject ')>>' |
[88] |
ExprTripleTermSubject |
::= | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | Var |
[89] |
ExprTripleTermObject |
::= | iri | RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral | Var | ExprTripleTerm |
[90] |
BrackettedExpression |
::= | '(' Expression ')' |
[91] |
BuiltInCall |
::= | 'STR' '(' Expression ')' |
[92] |
iriOrFunction |
::= | iri ArgList? |
[93] |
RDFLiteral |
::= | String ( LANG_DIR | '^^' iri )? |
[94] |
NumericLiteral |
::= | NumericLiteralUnsigned | NumericLiteralPositive | NumericLiteralNegative |
[95] |
NumericLiteralUnsigned |
::= | INTEGER | DECIMAL | DOUBLE |
[96] |
NumericLiteralPositive |
::= | INTEGER_POSITIVE | DECIMAL_POSITIVE | DOUBLE_POSITIVE |
[97] |
NumericLiteralNegative |
::= | INTEGER_NEGATIVE | DECIMAL_NEGATIVE | DOUBLE_NEGATIVE |
[98] |
BooleanLiteral |
::= | 'true' | 'false' |
[99] |
String |
::= | STRING_LITERAL1 | STRING_LITERAL2 | STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 | STRING_LITERAL_LONG2 |
[100] |
iri |
::= | IRIREF | PrefixedName |
[101] |
PrefixedName |
::= | PNAME_LN | PNAME_NS |
[102] |
BlankNode |
::= | BLANK_NODE_LABEL | ANON |
Productions for terminals:
[103] |
IRIREF |
::= | '<' ([^<>"{}|^`\]-[#x00-#x20])* '>' |
[104] |
PNAME_NS |
::= | PN_PREFIX? ':' |
[105] |
PNAME_LN |
::= | PNAME_NS PN_LOCAL |
[106] |
BLANK_NODE_LABEL |
::= | '_:' ( PN_CHARS_U | [0-9] ) ((PN_CHARS|'.')* PN_CHARS)? |
[107] |
VAR1 |
::= | '?' VARNAME |
[108] |
VAR2 |
::= | '$' VARNAME |
[109] |
LANG_DIR |
::= | '@' [a-zA-Z]+ ('-' [a-zA-Z0-9]+)* ('--' [a-zA-Z]+)? |
[110] |
INTEGER |
::= | [0-9]+ |
[111] |
DECIMAL |
::= | [0-9]* '.' [0-9]+ |
[112] |
DOUBLE |
::= | ( ([0-9]+ ('.'[0-9]*)? ) | ( '.' ([0-9])+ ) ) [eE][+-]?[0-9]+ |
[113] |
INTEGER_POSITIVE |
::= | '+' INTEGER |
[114] |
DECIMAL_POSITIVE |
::= | '+' DECIMAL |
[115] |
DOUBLE_POSITIVE |
::= | '+' DOUBLE |
[116] |
INTEGER_NEGATIVE |
::= | '-' INTEGER |
[117] |
DECIMAL_NEGATIVE |
::= | '-' DECIMAL |
[118] |
DOUBLE_NEGATIVE |
::= | '-' DOUBLE |
[119] |
STRING_LITERAL1 |
::= | "'" ( ([^#x27#x5C#xA#xD]) | ECHAR )* "'" |
[120] |
STRING_LITERAL2 |
::= | '"' ( ([^#x22#x5C#xA#xD]) | ECHAR )* '"' |
[121] |
STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 |
::= | "'''" ( ( "'" | "''" )? ( [^'\] | ECHAR ) )* "'''" |
[122] |
STRING_LITERAL_LONG2 |
::= | '"""' ( ( '"' | '""' )? ( [^"\] | ECHAR ) )* '"""' |
[123] |
ECHAR |
::= | '\' [tbnrf\"'] |
[124] |
NIL |
::= | '(' WS* ')' |
[125] |
WS |
::= | #x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA |
[126] |
ANON |
::= | '[' WS* ']' |
[127] |
PN_CHARS_BASE |
::= | [A-Z] | [a-z] | [#x00C0-#x00D6] | [#x00D8-#x00F6] | [#x00F8-#x02FF] | [#x0370-#x037D] | [#x037F-#x1FFF] | [#x200C-#x200D] | [#x2070-#x218F] | [#x2C00-#x2FEF] | [#x3001-#xD7FF] | [#xF900-#xFDCF] | [#xFDF0-#xFFFD] | [#x10000-#xEFFFF] |
[128] |
PN_CHARS_U |
::= | PN_CHARS_BASE | '_' |
[129] |
VARNAME |
::= | ( PN_CHARS_U | [0-9] ) ( PN_CHARS_U | [0-9] | #x00B7 | [#x0300-#x036F] | [#x203F-#x2040] )* |
[130] |
PN_CHARS |
::= | PN_CHARS_U | '-' | [0-9] | #x00B7 | [#x0300-#x036F] | [#x203F-#x2040] |
[131] |
PN_PREFIX |
::= | PN_CHARS_BASE ((PN_CHARS|'.')* PN_CHARS)? |
[132] |
PN_LOCAL |
::= | (PN_CHARS_U | ':' | [0-9] | PLX ) ((PN_CHARS | '.' | ':' | PLX)* (PN_CHARS | ':' | PLX) )? |
[133] |
PLX |
::= | PERCENT | PN_LOCAL_ESC |
[134] |
PERCENT |
::= | '%' HEX HEX |
[135] |
HEX |
::= | [0-9] | [A-F] | [a-f] |
[136] |
PN_LOCAL_ESC |
::= | '\' ( '_' | '~' | '.' | '-' | '!' | '$' | '&' | "'" | '(' | ')' | '*' | '+' | ',' | ';' | '=' | '/' | '?' | '#' | '@' | '%' ) |
@@see the Turtle registration for format
The Internet Media Type (formerly known as MIME Type) for @@ is "text/shape-rules".
The information that follows has been submitted to the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) for review, approval, and registration with IANA.
This section is non-normative.
TODO
This section is non-normative.
TODO
This section is non-normative.
TODO
This section is non-normative.
Many people contributed to this document, including members of the RDF Data Shapes Working Group.
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in: