IG/W3C spec review/improvments

From Web Security
  • Tools for tracking individual review

Has the group agreed to "track" reviews to facilitate Qs like "so, what is now being reviewed; when does the review for doc X end; who agreed to review doc X; where are the comments from the review of doc X; what were the results of the review" and such?

  • Tools for a reviewer team to interact/exchange

Is the expectation the reviews will be done on this list? The TAG uses GH for its reviews [GH]. It also seems something like [specifiction] could be used. How does PING conduct its spec reviews and track them (as it might make sense to use similar/identical methods)? [GH] <https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews> [specifiction] <http://discourse.specifiction.org/>