ISSUE-76: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed
clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MLW-LT Standard Draft
- Raised by:
- Felix Sasaki
- Opened on:
- 2013-01-11
- Description:
- Mikhail Kudinov, a developer of Verifika, an LQA suite, is pointing out the difference of use of "inconsistency" as an error category in industry LQA tools and in the ITS 2.0 spec and ask for calrification of the category; see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0026.html - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-392 on Arle Lommel to Make the edit for issue-76 - due 2013-01-30, closed- Related emails:
- [issue check] issues 74 - 89 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-05-07)
- [Agenda] DRAFT MLW-LT call 3 April, noon UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-03)
- Re: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-29)
- RE: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-03-28)
- [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-28)
- Fwd: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-28)
- Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-28)
- RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
- [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76, Re: [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- [Minutes and questions+comments] MLW-LT minutes 2013-01-28 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
- New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
- [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
- [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-18)
- Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from Dominic.Jones@scss.tcd.ie on 2013-01-16)
- Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-16)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
- [All] last call comment handling (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-76: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
Related notes:
DECISION-DETAILS: Needs follow up, no action for a month..
Mikhail Kudinov, a developer of Verifika, an LQA suite, is pointing out the difference of use of "inconsistency" as an error category in industry LQA tools and in the ITS 2.0 spec and ask for calrification of the category; see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0026.html
DECISION-DETAILS: Editorial action pending..
Accepted at the Prague F2F
http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item15
The resolution was to broaden the category description to explicitly cover the commenter's use case and provide a second example.
CHANGE-TYPE: editorial
David Filip, 27 Feb 2013, 10:26:03RESOLUTION: accepted
David Filip, 27 Feb 2013, 10:26:34COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0073.html
David Filip, 28 Feb 2013, 09:28:43RESOLUTION: accepted
David Filip, 5 Mar 2013, 09:33:01COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0073.html
David Filip, 6 Mar 2013, 08:59:58To be closed with Action-392 once completed..
David Filip, 26 Mar 2013, 12:48:37DECISION-DETAILS: Editorial Action-392 completed by Felix. Accepted at the Prague F2F
http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item15
The resolution was to broaden the category description to explicitly cover the commenter's use case and provide a second example.David Filip, 3 Apr 2013, 12:15:43
Display change log