ISSUE-76: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed

clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed

State:

CLOSED

Product:

MLW-LT Standard Draft

Raised by:

Felix Sasaki

Opened on:

2013-01-11

Description:

Mikhail Kudinov, a developer of Verifika, an LQA suite, is pointing out the difference of use of "inconsistency" as an error category in industry LQA tools and in the ITS 2.0 spec and ask for calrification of the category; see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0026.html

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-392 on Arle Lommel to Make the edit for issue-76 - due 2013-01-30, closed

Related emails:

1. [issue check] issues 74 - 89 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-05-07)
2. [Agenda] DRAFT MLW-LT call 3 April, noon UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-03)
3. Re: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-29)
4. RE: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-03-28)
5. [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-28)
6. Fwd: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-28)
7. Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-28)
8. RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
9. [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76, Re: [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
10. Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
11. [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
12. [Minutes and questions+comments] MLW-LT minutes 2013-01-28 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
13. RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
14. New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
15. Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
16. [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
17. Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
18. [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-18)
19. Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from Dominic.Jones@scss.tcd.ie on 2013-01-16)
20. Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-16)
21. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
22. [All] last call comment handling (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
23. mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-76: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-11)

Related notes:

Display change log