ACTION-392: Make the edit for issue-76
Make the edit for issue-76
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Arle Lommel
- Due on:
- January 30, 2013
- Created on:
- January 23, 2013
- Associated Issue:
- ISSUE-76
- Related emails:
- Re: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-29)
- RE: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-03-28)
- [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-28)
- Fwd: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-28)
- Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-28)
- RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
- [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76, Re: [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- Re: [Minutes, action items and "use cases" high level summary] 2013-02-13 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-14)
- RE: [Minutes, action items and "use cases" high level summary] 2013-02-13 (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-02-14)
- [Minutes, action items and "use cases" high level summary] 2013-02-13 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-13)
- RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
- New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
- [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
Related notes:
[omstefanov]: Make the edit for issue 76. Does anyone know where Arle is on this. Felix says unclear whether just wording change or change of implementation.
13 Feb 2013, 13:24:58The text now reads “The text is inconsistent with itself or is translated inconsistency (NB: not for use with terminology inconsistency).”
It has also added an example: “The translated text uses different wording for multiple instances of a single regulatory notice that occurs in multiple locations in a series of manuals.”
Display change log.