ISSUE-63: New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance"
New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MLW-LT Standard Draft
- Raised by:
- Felix Sasaki
- Opened on:
- 2012-12-14
- Description:
- See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2012Dec/0030.html - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-453 on Felix Sasaki to Do edit for issue-63 - due 2013-03-06, closed- Related emails:
- Fwd: Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2012-12-17 and further info / questions (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-06-26)
- Edit for issue-63 ("non-conformance" value), action-453 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-22)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-27 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-27)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-27)
- RE: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
- [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
- AW: [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com on 2013-02-25)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-22)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-22)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-21)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-21)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-21)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-21)
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-20)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-20)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-05)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
- RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
- New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
- [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from Dominic.Jones@scss.tcd.ie on 2013-01-16)
- Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-16)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
- Re: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-01-09)
- RE: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-08)
- Re: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-08)
- Re: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-08)
- Re: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-08)
- RE: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-08)
- Re: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-07)
- Re: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-07)
- RE: Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-07)
- Locworld June Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-07)
- Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-04)
- Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-04)
- Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-04)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 7 January, 4 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-12-30)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2012-12-17 and further info / questions (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-12-17)
- Re: [Agenda update, still including critical M2 check] MLW-LT call 2012-12-17, 4 p.m. UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2012-12-17)
- [Agenda update, still including critical M2 check] MLW-LT call 2012-12-17, 4 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-12-17)
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2012-12-14)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2012-12-14)
- issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-12-14)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-63: New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-12-14)
Related notes:
DECISION-DETAILS: Under discussion. Progress dependent on second implementer expressing an interest in adding the conformance type to lqi. Suggest finalising search for seconder at 6th Feb conf call - see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0009.html
This new value reciceived support in the discussion. Call for consensus will be made on the WG list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0039.html
If no objections received, this will be accepted as a minor change..
DECISION-DETAILS: This new value received support in the discussion. Call for consensus will be made on the WG list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0039.html
If no objections received, this will be accepted as a minor change..
DECISION-DETAILS: Editorial action pending.
This new value received support in the discussion. The new value will be introduced as "non-conformance".
Call for consensus made and succeeded in the WG meeting Feb 27, 2013
CHANGE-TYPE: editorial
David Filip, 27 Feb 2013, 18:22:47RESOLUTION: accepted
David Filip, 27 Feb 2013, 18:23:26COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied, see minutes Feb 27, 2013.
David Filip, 27 Feb 2013, 18:24:42DECISION-DETAILS: Editorial action completed by Felix.
This new value received support in the discussion. The new value will be introduced as "non-conformance".
Call for consensus made and succeeded in the WG meeting Feb 27, 2013David Filip, 22 Mar 2013, 21:30:29
Display change log