This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Is there a reason why the DOCTYPE is output in the current, IMHO ugly, xsl:text way? It'd be better to move the DOCTYPE declaration into the xsl:output element's doctype-public... I'll attach a patch.
Created attachment 1 [details] XSL de-uglification Whoo, Bugzilla is evolving, it wasn't possible to add a comment while adding an attachment before :)
The XSL is pretty much straight from Nick on #validator; I don't know the first thing about XSL. Nick, please review this and reassign the bug to Ville if he should apply this to CVS.
Didn't make the cut for 0.6.0. Retargetting for 0.6.1.
Ping Nick... :-)
According to Nick on IRC it was done this way for hysterical raisins. Go ahead an fixup any way that makes sense to you.
Done in CVS (1.2.2.1).