This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
This issue was originally reported by XML Schema WG. Should we add anyAtomicType as requested by QT? Should we add it as the supertype of all atomic types or as a union of all atomic types? This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-09-18 (http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html) This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-09-26 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2003Oct/0001.html) This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-10-02 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2003Oct/0007.html) This item was discussed, and phase-1 agreement was reached, in the meeting of 2004-03-19 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0072.html). ... The datatype has been added to the Datatypes spec, so this requirement has been discharged. See also bug 1852 and related bugs, which relate to specific problems that arose when aligning Datatypes and Structures as a result of this change.