This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1852 - RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)
Summary: RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 critical
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w...
Whiteboard: status?
Keywords: needsReview
Depends on: 1843 1853
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-08-17 15:37 UTC by Henry S. Thompson
Modified: 2008-03-05 14:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Henry S. Thompson 2005-08-17 15:37:49 UTC
Umbrella issue for all the sub-parts remaining to be done, as discussed
at the August 2005 f2f
Comment 1 Henry S. Thompson 2005-08-17 15:42:27 UTC
Get dependency in right direction
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2006-01-28 18:07:57 UTC
A wording proposal to take care of most of the necessary changes
was sent to the WG on 27 January 2006.  The alignment in the
proposal may be incomplete, but it takes care at least of the most
egregious conflicts.
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2006-09-21 00:00:28 UTC
At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg,
the Working Group decided not to take further action on this
issue in XML Schema 1.1.  (This issue was not discussed
separately; it was one of those which were dispatched by a
blanket decision that all other open issues would be closed
without action, unless raised again in last-call comments.)  Some
members of the Working Group expressed regret over not being able
to resolve all the issues dealt with in this way, but on the
whole the Working Group felt it better not to delay Datatypes 1.1
in order to resolve all of them.

This issue should have been marked as RESOLVED /WONTFIX at that
time, but apparently was not.  I am marking it that way now, to
reduce confusion.
Comment 4 Dave Peterson 2008-03-05 14:36:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Umbrella issue for all the sub-parts remaining to be done, as discussed
> at the August 2005 f2f

Even after reviewing the minutes of that meeting, I can't figure out what the issues of "sub-parts remaining to be done" are.  Since no one has complained about the resolution in over a year, I'm marking this closed.