This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 16344 - The td[nowrap], th[nowrap] rule should be replaced with http://simon.html5.org/specs/quirks-mode#the-table-cell-width-resets-nowrap-quirk
Summary: The td[nowrap], th[nowrap] rule should be replaced with http://simon.html5.or...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-13 16:01 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-09-19 22:33 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2012-03-13 16:01:38 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/rendering.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#tables
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#tables

Comment:
The td[nowrap], th[nowrap] rule should be replaced with
http://simon.html5.org/specs/quirks-mode#the-table-cell-width-resets-nowrap-qu
irk

Posted from: 85.227.157.105 by simonp@opera.com
User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7.2; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.61
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-06-07 00:20:40 UTC 
Kinda done, though please check the new text as although I think what I wrote is exactly equivalent, it is written in exactly the opposite way and I'm concerned that I may have misunderstood some subtlety that explains why you wrote it the way you did, rather than the way most of the quirks are specced.
Comment 2 contributor 2012-06-07 00:30:11 UTC 
Checked in as WHATWG revision r7123.
Check-in comment: import the lone HTML quirk from zcorpan's draft
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7122&to=7123
Comment 3 Simon Pieters 2012-06-11 07:17:49 UTC 
I just wanted to avoid applying a style rule and then reverting it, but either way works. However, you missed the value zero which should be excluded.
Comment 4 contributor 2012-07-18 17:45:09 UTC 
This bug was cloned to create bug 18226 as part of operation convergence.
Comment 5 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-09-19 22:33:54 UTC 
Zero is excluded by the microsyntax parser, no need to mention it in this paragraph.