8891
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
No change or so-called zero edit proposals
|
2010-02-06
|
2010-07-28
|
8892
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
HTML5 editor should propose changes within email list
|
2010-02-06
|
2010-05-04
|
8893
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Clarify how Change Proposals get reviewed and what happens to Change Proposals that do not meet requirements
|
2010-02-07
|
2010-07-28
|
8894
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Document process for counter-proposals and alternate proposals
|
2010-02-07
|
2010-07-28
|
8895
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
REOP
|
---
|
Document policy for First Public Working Drafts
|
2010-02-07
|
2013-01-22
|
8896
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Clarify that anyone who is dissatisfied with a bug resolution may reopen or escalate
|
2010-02-07
|
2010-03-25
|
9007
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Clarify that bugs should not be reopened when escalating to the tracker
|
2010-02-15
|
2010-03-25
|
9187
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Need transparency in issue and bug status in databases & document.
|
2010-03-04
|
2010-07-28
|
9283
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
NEEDSINFO is a more appropriate resolution for bugs that are missing info than INVALID
|
2010-03-19
|
2010-03-25
|
9284
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Consider giving guidelines for use of different bug resolutions
|
2010-03-19
|
2010-07-28
|
9313
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Use some state other than CLOSED for issues that are closed without prejudice, for lack of action by a deadline
|
2010-03-25
|
2010-03-25
|
9314
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WONT
|
Include issue markers in drafts for issues that have been closed without prejudice
|
2010-03-25
|
2010-05-04
|
9315
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WONT
|
Retain issue markers for issues that have timed out even during Last Call
|
2010-03-25
|
2010-05-05
|
9316
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Make rejected bugs more visible
|
2010-03-25
|
2010-03-25
|
9317
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WORK
|
bug states should distinguish the true state of the bug
|
2010-03-25
|
2010-03-25
|
9318
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
The state for bugs with no reply should be CLOSED NoReply instead of VERIFIED NoReply
|
2010-03-25
|
2010-03-25
|
9334
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Markup error in decision-policy-v2.html
|
2010-03-26
|
2010-05-04
|
9554
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Define procedure for entering Last Call
|
2010-04-19
|
2011-05-16
|
9654
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
issues that are deferred due to timeout should be identified as "presumed deferred"
|
2010-05-04
|
2010-05-04
|
9729
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WORK
|
Straw poll method hides or discourages gathering essential information
|
2010-05-13
|
2010-06-03
|
9792
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Clarify that no-change counter-proposals need to document rationale for the existing text
|
2010-05-21
|
2010-07-28
|
9836
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WORK
|
The working group should consider all of a response, not just the first five words, to determine its meaning.
|
2010-06-02
|
2010-06-03
|
9894
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
WONT
|
The chairs should be required to ensure that decisions result in consistent specifications
|
2010-06-09
|
2010-09-29
|
9898
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WORK
|
The Decision Policy (as applied) is ineffective at getting closure on ISSUEs
|
2010-06-10
|
2010-08-25
|
9901
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
co-chairs should also address objections raised in change proposals
|
2010-06-10
|
2010-07-28
|
9918
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
FIXE
|
Consider adding a consensus-building component into the decision process
|
2010-06-13
|
2011-01-01
|
10084
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
WONT
|
Please consider adding a section on Chair recusal in deciding escalated issues
|
2010-07-05
|
2010-07-28
|
10230
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
Paul.Cotton
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Decisions need to be made in timely manner
|
2010-07-23
|
2011-06-20
|
10524
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Please clarify procedure and recourse for non-working group members when they are unsatisfied with a bug resolution
|
2010-09-01
|
2011-05-16
|
10974
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Document Process for entering Last Call comments
|
2010-10-04
|
2011-05-16
|
10993
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
INVA
|
dummy issue -- please ignore
|
2010-10-08
|
2010-10-08
|
11197
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Require Change Proposals in order to reintroduce a change related to a revert
|
2010-11-02
|
2011-06-20
|
11447
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Please document in the decision policy the procedure for reopening an issue
|
2010-12-01
|
2011-05-16
|
11637
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
Paul.Cotton
|
RESO
|
WONT
|
Disallow abusing the Decision Policy by escalating editorial bugs
|
2011-01-01
|
2011-03-13
|
12029
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Define a process for "particularly exceptional circumstances"
|
2011-02-10
|
2011-05-30
|
12104
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
FIXE
|
Typo: will will
|
2011-02-17
|
2011-05-19
|
12117
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Coordination
|
2011-02-18
|
2011-06-19
|
12327
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
clarify what materials are considered when chairs look at survey results
|
2011-03-17
|
2011-05-18
|
12675
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Describe enhanced change control in Decision Policy
|
2011-05-17
|
2011-05-30
|
12731
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
FIXE
|
Bug originators should be allowed to mark their own bugs INVALID
|
2011-05-24
|
2011-05-30
|
12732
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
FIXE
|
There should be a way to disagree without escalating to an ISSUE
|
2011-05-24
|
2011-05-30
|
12733
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Various typos in Decision Policy
|
2011-05-24
|
2011-06-20
|
12734
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
RESO
|
INVA
|
Starting with LC2 or perhaps before, all changes need to be associated with a duly filed LC2 or earlier bug
|
2011-05-24
|
2016-04-28
|
12776
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Define process for deciding whether a draft is REC-track or Note-track
|
2011-05-25
|
2011-06-27
|
12811
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
The Decision Policy should give an overview of the policies it defines
|
2011-05-29
|
2011-05-30
|
12992
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Editorial comments on Decision Policy, Part 1
|
2011-06-19
|
2011-06-20
|
13003
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
RESO
|
INVA
|
Define role of Editorial Assistants
|
2011-06-20
|
2016-04-28
|
13033
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Remove obsolete references to pre-LC and pre-Last Call
|
2011-06-23
|
2011-08-02
|
13050
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
CLOS
|
FIXE
|
Typo in decision policy: "descrption"
|
2011-06-24
|
2011-08-02
|
13243
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
copy/paste of titles in reopen section
|
2011-07-14
|
2011-08-02
|
13244
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
RESO
|
FIXE
|
Unresolved internal links in v2 of decision policy
|
2011-07-14
|
2011-08-02
|
13251
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Change Proposals sometimes may get the way to the survey stage that are unclear, self-contradictory, or lacking in rationale for some aspects
|
2011-07-14
|
2011-07-14
|
13253
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Sometimes Change Proposals request a grab bag of changes that are loosely related, but separable in principle
|
2011-07-14
|
2011-07-15
|
13263
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements can consume undue time and energy
|
2011-07-14
|
2012-02-07
|
13305
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
NEW
|
---
|
WG Decisions
|
2011-07-19
|
2011-07-20
|
13306
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
NEW
|
---
|
Establish a deadline for implementation of WG Decisions
|
2011-07-19
|
2012-04-10
|
15599
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Document bug state for bugs escalated after time out
|
2012-01-18
|
2012-01-18
|
16481
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
NEW
|
---
|
Establish a feature freeze - no adding of new features based on bug or editor's discretion, without prior WG approval
|
2012-03-22
|
2012-04-24
|
16674
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
NEW
|
---
|
Feature discouragement in issue process - can use "too late to add features" as a technical argument in a counter-proposal
|
2012-04-10
|
2012-04-10
|
16675
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Switch to a review-then-commit model for spec development
|
2012-04-10
|
2012-09-25
|
16676
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
mjs
|
NEW
|
---
|
Limit scope of LC2 bugs to relate to items that were changed since LC1
|
2012-04-10
|
2012-09-25
|
16677
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Consider requiring seconds for Change Proposals
|
2012-04-10
|
2012-04-10
|
18997
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Define a process for integrating extension specs during CR
|
2012-09-24
|
2012-09-25
|
18998
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Define a process for removing nominated at-risk features early in CR
|
2012-09-24
|
2012-09-25
|
19922
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
note-vs-rec item 4: should be _no_ one objects
|
2012-11-09
|
2012-11-09
|
21806
|
HTML WG
|
working
|
dave.null
|
NEW
|
---
|
Editors' response could be simplified
|
2013-04-23
|
2015-02-16
|