Meeting minutes
Approval of last week’s minutes: 1
<pfps> minutes look OK
<ora> proposal: Approve last week's minutes
<niklasl> +1
<ora> +1
<ktk> +1
0 (not there for most of the time)
<TallTed> +1
<gtw> +1
<william-vw> +1
<olaf> +1
<pchampin> +1
<doerthe> 0
RESOLUTION: Approve last week's minutes
Review of open actions, available at 2
ora: actions ongoing
<pchampin> w3c/
pchampin: we resolved to create a note - > w3c/
… first pull request
<pchampin> https://
<gb> Pull Request 1 add tentative diagram for threat modeling (by pchampin)
pchampin: with diagram
… the diagram is the basis for a threat model
AndyS: it might be worthwile to include "triple store" or "SPARQL store", to differentiate from any other store
AndyS: maybe say "triplestore" or "SPARQL store" to give the scope
ora: good start
Review of open PRs, available at 3
AndyS: I added an editorial PR on RDF-Concepts to remove borders on array cells
AndyS: table appearance PR on RDF Concepts
<Zakim> pfps, you wanted to discuss semantics
pfps: bunch of "include common files by reference" PRs.
… are they ready to go?
niklasl: yes - Concepts already uses this pattern
<pchampin> +1 to merge them
<Zakim> niklasl, you wanted to discuss common files by reference
niklasl: snapshot does not has the dynamic setup so reSped works.
<Zakim> pchampin, you wanted to discuss concepts
pchampin: concepts PR re: text direction
… now ready to go (minor tweaks from i18n).
… last horizontal review comment on concepts
niklasl: wait one week for all approvals
ora: rdf-new #19 -- is it still needed?
<gb> CLOSED Action 19 work with antoine and others to come up with a proposal for weak and strong compliance (on Antoine-Zimmermann, rdfguy) due 16 Feb 2023
pchampin: suggest we merge semantics and n-triples so we can vote on move to CR today
<niklasl> +1 to pchampin
pchampin: and it's a test of the process
pfps: will do for semantics
… done.
pchampin: reviews - security is green as we are working on threat model.
… TAG review ... believed done
… i18n ... done
… a transition request resolution can be done
<ora> proposal: Advance Concepts, Semantics, and N-Triples to CR
<ora> PROPOSAL: advance rdf12-concepts, rdf12-semantics, and rdf12-n-triples to Candidate Recommendation
<pfps> +1
<pchampin> +1
<niklasl> +1
<ora> +1
<ktk> +1
<gtw> +1
<olaf> +1
<william-vw> +1
<AndyS> +1
<doerthe> +1
<TallTed> +1
RESOLUTION: advance rdf12-concepts, rdf12-semantics, and rdf12-n-triples to Candidate Recommendation
<fsasaki> +1
andys: a couple of editorial PRs on rdf-xml ready to go
ora: dark mode status?
niklasl: no response to issue realise last year - can apply our local solution
Identifying issues to solve before CR 4
ktk: created review for Turtle, NQ and TriG. Should go smoothly.
pfps: entailment regime - work-in-progress - wording fix
… SPARQL query needs a fix around graph equivalence - it need renaming bnodes apart
… we think better wording is needed
<gb> Issue 366 definition of graph-equivalent (by pfps)
pfps: needs to say "rename bnodes apart"
AndyS: is it in the entailment extension?
pfps: no, in sparql-query, section 19
AndyS: could you make a PR? and look at section 18 as well?
pfps: assuming we are talking about simple entailment, I can do that
https://
AndyS: 18.6.3 is the extension point for entailment regimes
pfps: it refers back to D-entailment; I guess that's ok
AndyS: not for today, but we need to discuss the extensions on RDF-XML
Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting
AndyS: we have 3 new features, and 3 different way to extend RDF/XML 1.1. Not the right way to do it.
ora: I am now an Invited Expert
olaf: Cost action: GOBLIN for networking ... there will be a hackathon on metadata for knowledge graphs.
pfps: I will giving a wikidata ontology course
<pfps> The course page is https://