15:57:35 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:57:39 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/03/26-rdf-star-irc 15:57:39 meeting: RDF-star WG meeting 15:57:53 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/e5234c80-4c06-4c6b-af43-c78a1dbd390a/20260326T120000/ 15:57:53 clear agenda 15:57:53 agenda+ Approval of last week’s minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2026/03/19-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:57:53 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 15:57:53 agenda+ Review of open PRs, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 15:57:55 agenda+ Identifying issues to solve before CR -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/8 15:57:58 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 15:58:20 present+ 15:59:17 regrets+ tl, Dominik_T 15:59:17 present+ 16:00:15 william-vw has joined #rdf-star 16:00:19 present+ 16:00:26 ora has joined #rdf-star 16:00:35 present+ 16:00:36 present+ 16:00:38 present+ 16:00:47 olaf has joined #rdf-star 16:01:16 present+ 16:01:20 chair+ 16:01:51 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 16:01:57 present+ 16:03:36 present+ 16:03:37 scribe+ 16:03:58 agenda? 16:04:02 Zakim, open item 1 16:04:04 agendum 1 -- Approval of last week’s minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2026/03/19-rdf-star-minutes.html -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:04:25 minutes look OK 16:04:36 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 16:04:36 proposal: Approve last week's minutes 16:04:39 +1 16:04:39 +1 16:04:40 +1 16:04:40 0 (not there for most of the time) 16:04:42 +1 16:04:45 +1 16:04:45 +1 16:04:45 +1 16:04:47 Present+ 16:04:55 +1 16:04:55 0 16:05:07 present+ 16:05:11 resolved: Approve last week's minutes 16:05:26 Zakim, next item 16:05:28 agendum 2 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:05:45 q+ 16:06:29 ora: actions ongoing 16:06:40 ack pchampin 16:06:46 fsasaki has joined #rdf-star 16:06:49 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-threat-model/ 16:06:54 present+ felix 16:07:10 pchampin: we resolved to create a note - > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-threat-model/ 16:07:16 ... first pull request 16:07:31 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-threat-model/pull/1/changes 16:07:32 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-threat-model/pull/1 -> Pull Request 1 add tentative diagram for threat modeling (by pchampin) 16:07:48 ... with diagram 16:08:24 ... the diagram is the basis for a threat model 16:08:52 q+ 16:08:57 scribe+ 16:08:59 ack AndyS 16:10:09 AndyS: it might be worthwile to include "triple store" or "SPARQL store", to differentiate from any other store 16:10:19 AndyS: maybe say "triplestore" or "SPARQL store" to give the scope 16:10:25 scribe- 16:10:31 ora: good start 16:10:43 Zakim, next item 16:10:43 agendum 3 -- Review of open PRs, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:11:17 q+ 16:11:41 ack AndyS 16:11:46 scribe+ 16:11:55 q+ for semantics 16:12:14 AndyS: I added an editorial PR on RDF-Concepts to remove borders on array cells 16:12:23 q+ for concepts 16:12:29 AndyS: table appearance PR on RDF Concepts 16:12:38 ack pfps 16:12:38 pfps, you wanted to discuss semantics 16:12:56 q+ for common files by reference 16:13:09 pfps: bunch of "include common files by reference" PRs. 16:13:25 ... are they ready to go? 16:13:45 niklasl: yes - Concepts already uses this pattern 16:14:15 q? 16:14:46 +1 to merge them 16:14:46 ack niklasl 16:14:46 niklasl, you wanted to discuss common files by reference 16:14:47 ... snapshot does not has the dynamic setup so reSped works. 16:15:15 ack pchampin 16:15:15 pchampin, you wanted to discuss concepts 16:15:34 pchampin: concepts PR re: text direction 16:15:55 ... now ready to go (minor tweaks from i18n). 16:16:18 ... last horizontal review comment on concepts 16:17:10 q+ 16:17:30 niklasl: wait one week for all approvals 16:18:20 ora: rdf-new #19 -- is it still needed? 16:18:21 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19 -> CLOSED Action 19 work with antoine and others to come up with a proposal for weak and strong compliance (on Antoine-Zimmermann, rdfguy) due 16 Feb 2023 16:18:31 ack pchampin 16:19:13 pchampin: suggest we merge semantics and n-triples so we can vote on move to CR today 16:19:19 +1 to pchampin 16:19:27 ... and it's a test of the process 16:20:10 pfps: will do for semantics 16:20:19 ... done. 16:22:22 AndyS has joined #rdf-star 16:23:04 pchampin: reviews - security is green as we are working on threat model. 16:23:17 ... TAG review ... believed done 16:23:22 ... i18n ... done 16:23:46 ... a transition request resolution can be done 16:23:47 proposal: Advance Concepts, Semantics, and N-Triples to CR 16:24:33 PROPOSAL: advance rdf12-concepts, rdf12-semantics, and rdf12-n-triples to Candidate Recommendation 16:24:35 +1 16:24:36 +1 16:24:36 +1 16:24:37 +1 16:24:38 +1 16:24:38 +1 16:24:38 +1 16:24:40 +1 16:24:41 +1 16:24:43 +1 16:25:16 +1 16:25:37 RESOLVED: advance rdf12-concepts, rdf12-semantics, and rdf12-n-triples to Candidate Recommendation 16:25:51 +1 16:28:37 andys: a couple of editorial PRs on rdf-xml ready to go 16:29:40 q+ 16:29:49 ack niklasl 16:30:00 ora: dark mode status? 16:30:38 niklasl: no response to issue realise last year - can apply our local solution 16:32:45 Zakim, next item 16:32:45 agendum 4 -- Identifying issues to solve before CR -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/8 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:33:12 q+ 16:33:52 ack ktk 16:34:11 q+ 16:34:19 ktk: created review for Turtle, NQ and TriG. Should go smoothly. 16:35:06 pfps: entailment regime - work-in-progress - wording fix 16:35:50 ... SPARQL query needs a fix around graph equivalence - it need renaming bnodes apart 16:36:07 ... we think better wording is needed 16:37:08 https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/issues/366 16:37:08 https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/issues/366 -> Issue 366 definition of graph-equivalent (by pfps) 16:38:20 pfps: needs to say "rename bnodes apart" 16:38:30 scribe+ 16:38:39 AndyS: is it in the entailment extension? 16:38:59 pfps: no, in sparql-query, section 19 16:39:17 AndyS: could you make a PR? and look at section 18 as well? 16:39:29 pfps: assuming we are talking about simple entailment, I can do that 16:39:37 https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlBGPExtend 16:40:35 AndyS: 18.6.3 is the extension point for entailment regimes 16:41:24 pfps: it refers back to D-entailment; I guess that's ok 16:41:24 ack pchampin 16:42:40 AndyS: not for today, but we need to discuss the extensions on RDF-XML 16:42:46 Zakim, next item 16:42:46 agendum 5 -- Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:43:01 ... we have 3 new features, and 3 different way to extend RDF/XML 1.1. Not the right way to do it. 16:43:22 ora: I am now an Invited Expert 16:46:42 olaf: Cost action: GOBLIN for networking ... there will be a hackathon on metadata for knowledge graphs. 16:47:35 https://goblin-cost.eu/workshops-conferences/hackathon-on-metadata-and-provenance-for-knowledge-graphs/ 16:48:11 pfps: I will giving a wikidata ontology course 16:48:17 The course page is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Ontology/Ontology_Course 16:50:20 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:50:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/03/26-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:51:15 olaf has left #rdf-star 16:59:11 pfps has left #rdf-star 17:01:24 lisp has joined #rdf-star