Meeting minutes
TPAC
<julierawe> https://
<julierawe> Time zones
<julierawe> Japan (in-person location) 9am-4pm
<julierawe> Boston 7pm - 2am
<julierawe> London 12am - 7am
<julierawe> Israel 2am - 9am
<julierawe> India 5:30am - 1:30pm
<julierawe> Seattle 4pm - 11pm
<julierawe> Registration
<julierawe> $90 for online-only participation
<julierawe> Some breakout sessions are free and open to the public, no registration needed.
<julierawe> Registration link: https://
<julierawe> Questions: email w3t-tpregister@w3.org
<julierawe> TPAC daily schedule: https://
<julierawe> A few events that may be of special interest to COGA:
<julierawe> AG working group on Monday, November 10th
<julierawe> Will start with 2-hour retrospective
<julierawe> Event link: https://
julierawe: AG has a session today, retrospective on what they've been doing (7PM Boston time), 2 hours
<julierawe> AG working group on Monday, November 10th
<julierawe> Will start with 2-hour retrospective
<julierawe> Event link: https://
<julierawe> Oops, repasted the same thing
<julierawe> AG working group on Wednesday, November 12th
<julierawe> 1-hour breakout on WCAG 3 update
<julierawe> Event link: https://
<julierawe> ARIA/APA joint meeting
<julierawe> Event link: https://
<julierawe> 13 November 2025, 13:45–15:00 Japan time
<julierawe> 12 November 2025 at 11:45pm – 1am Boston time
<julierawe> Key/important parts of documents
<julierawe> Triggering content
<julierawe> Lisa can you input these details on day and time?
Lisa: Am on the APA agenda regarding issue papers - short session on COGA issue papers
<Lisa> https://
Lisa: Lots of call out sesions happening on Wednesday (Japan time), APA, Maturity Model
Lisa: Will make a shareable list of sessions of interest with the group.
<Lisa> https://
<Lisa> https://
Lisa: Breakouts are shown by the previous github link
<Lisa> agenda
Lisa: If folks are stuck on aspects of the sessions, I will be on #coga occasionally.
<Jan> Are they recording any of these sessions for people to view later?
julierawe: That hasn't been mentioned (about recording the sessions)
Issue papers
<Lisa> not in, full citations
<Lisa> credits.
<Lisa> I will put the credits in before publications so we can check them, but in the mean time
<Lisa> https://
<Lisa> https://
<Lisa> https://
<Lisa> https://
Lisa: Need citation section inserted (but link to citations doc is there).
Lisa: Cover document has updated modules and old documents
Lisa: Significant contributors not yet added.
<julierawe> Lisa will change "Issue Papers" to "Research modules" in the titles for each paper
Lisa: Supported decision making review will be Tuesday 1AM EST. We can have a follow up session after.
julierawe: shared decision-making is a recently added term, maybe worth taking out as it is a separate 'lane'
Lisa: Safety and Well being might be a good one to bring up as well - does have content related to algorithms and AI, curated content.
Lisa: Wayfinding paper is still missing user needs section. Should we show folks or not.
<kirkwood> +1
<Eric_hind> +1
julierawe: Lack of title reference to 'digital'. Paper is not clear in the title, could be virtual, web, etc.
<Gareth> I need to drop out, catch up Thursday.
julierawe: Suggest adding technology wording to the title.
<julierawe> Suggest changing the title to "Technology-Assisted Navigation (Wayfinding)"
charli: Found title confusing, agree with revising title to give clarity about the subject of the wayfinding.
Lisa: Objections to APA having a look at these issue papers?
Lisa: Are we OK with sharing what we have with APA and AG?
<julierawe> Call for consensus to share these draft modules with APA and the AG?
<julierawe> +1 if you agree
<julierawe> 0 if you're not sure
<julierawe> -1 if you have objection
<Eric_hind> +1
<julierawe> +1
<Lisa> i will change the names
<kirkwood> +1
julierawe: Recommend guideance on assessing issues - major, minor, etc.
<Lisa> agree to share documents more or less as is, do a call for concer, with acnolmgments seprate
<julierawe> Does everyone agree to share these draft modules as is and we'll do a separate call for consensus about the acknowledgements (which have not been written yet)?
<julierawe> +1 if you agree
<julierawe> 0 if you're not sure
<julierawe> -1 if you object
<Eric_hind> +1
<Lisa> +1
<Charli> +1
<julierawe> +1
<kirkwood> +1
ACTION: item: Lisa to send the links with guidance on how to provide feedback (specifying whether a comment is a showstopper or not)