Meeting minutes
Accept the minutes of the previous meeting
[Agreed]
Review of open actions
2024-10-01-e: SP to review ixml tests and correct the grammar
[Done]
2025-04-15-a: NW to try to clarify “parse tree” in the specification in a way that is satisfactory to everyone
This is dependent on 2025-08-19-a
2025-08-19-b: SP to remove S06 from the specification.
Steven: https://
… all similar errors to be removed
2025-08-19-c: BTW to attempt to rewrite #19 so that it's clearer.
[Done]
2025-08-19-d: SP to add the modularization paper to the Invisible XML repository
<norm> https://
<norm> invisibleXML/
Norm: That's the one
2025-08-19-e: SP to assemble a discussion document for the conference.
[Done]
Status reports
[None]
New open issues
John: Please read and see what you think
… for partial parses on a document that has already been through ixml
Bethan: Since this isn't a proposal, can we put it off
John: OK
Review of BTW’s reformulation of #19
<norm> https://
Steven: Looks OK
All: Agree
[Bethan disappears]
[Bethan reappears]
Steven: Next meeting move ahead on pragmas
Bethan: Now we can move to proposal for pragmas
ixml Symposium
Norm: We need to have some criteria for accepting.
<norm> FYI: https://
Bethan: We need a code of conduct, are we required to use W3C's code?
David: If it is sponsored by the CG, it is W3C; other option is the 6 of us to sponsor the symposium
Norm: I can confirm we are required to use the W3C one
Nico: It is very clear
ACTION: Steven to ask W3C if there are any particulars about a CG meeting
Norm: It would be my preference to do it from the CG
[Discussion about which Zoom licence to use]
Steven: We agree to allow audience as well as presenters.
Bethan: If we get too many submissions, then we should select, so we shouldn't guarantee acceptance.
… I want to propose we have a rule about presentations around LLMs that the LLM being used doesn't use non-consented content.
Norm: I'd like to do the text manipulation offline
… Would we allow people to refuse to be recorded?
David: I think it reasonable to keep presentations for the sake of the symposium
Bethan: I think insisting on recordings might have a chilling effect for some people.
… we should allow people afterwards to decide
Norm: More work
Nico: Who will edit the recordings?
Bethan: I will
Norm: Then we can allow people to review it in that case
Steven: Dates? Th/Fr 26/27 Feb?
All: Looks good
Steven: Time?
John: I propose an hour later
Norm: Makes sense
Steven: So resolved
Steven: Web page on invisiblexml.org; we would need to make a registration page.
Modularisation
John: I have a demo
[Demo of modularisation]
Next meeting
Steven: 30th September, John scribing
[ADJOURN]