Meeting minutes
Agenda Review
Action Items
<addison> https://
<addison> #182
<gb> Action 182 respond to CSS, cancel existing call, propose ideas for future cooperation per today's telecon (on aphillips) due 2025-08-14
addison: responded to them, and cancel one for this month, will continue discussion
<addison> close #182
<gb> Closed issue #182
<addison> #181
<gb> Action 181 schedule topic to review server config articles/materials per 2025-08-07 call (on aphillips) due 2025-08-14
<addison> #171
<gb> Action 171 revise local-font-access to exclude localhost and talk more about opt-in model (on ZainabAq) due 2025-05-22
<addison> #157
<gb> Action 157 write glossary proposal identifying options and next steps for those options (on aphillips) due 2025-02-20
addison: close this one, #157
<addison> close #157
<gb> Closed issue #157
addison: xfq, you made PR on this point, and in agenda point in sometime future (or this week)
<addison> #151
<gb> Action 151 look into the line height of text containing emphasis marks, CSSWG issue # 11257 (on fantasai) due 2024-12-24
<addison> #135
<gb> Action 135 follow up on XR issue 1393 about locale in session (on aphillips) due 2024-10-17
<addison> #127
<gb> Action 127 make a list of shared topics of interest between TG2 and W3C-I18N (on aphillips) due 2024-09-30
addison: done on this
<addison> #125
<gb> Action 125 propose creating a UTR for text-emphasis skip if we can get help with maintain (on aphillips) due 2024-09-30
addison: 125, CSS action item
<addison> close #125
<gb> Closed issue #125
<addison> #33
<gb> Action 33 Close issues marked `close?` or bring to WG for further review (on aphillips)
addison: will clean up and check potential next steps
<addison> #7
<gb> Action 7 Remind shepherds to tend to their awaiting comment resolutions (Evergreen) (on aphillips, xfq, himorin, r12a, bert-github) due 18 Jul 2023
<addison> #4
<gb> Action 4 Work with respec and bikeshed to provide the character markup template as easy-to-use markup (on aphillips) due 27 Jul 2023
Info Share
JcK: [small voice
addison: long standing WHATWG tracking issues on these
… WG is actioned to work on fixing email address one
… surprised IETF was not aware
JcK: WG is concerned on that
… particulally on @@@1
<r12a> Universal Acceptance Expert Working Group
r12a: joined @@@2
… no idea on @@@3
Review RADAR Review
<addison> https://
addison: no new incoming
Pending Issue Review
<addison> https://
addison: need some clean up here
<r12a> https://
r12a: there is update on official titles
Follow up on TG2 and CSS Conversations
addison: later today TG2 call
xfq: in their repo, they also can label issue as i18n
Gap could be misunderstood as a literal typographic gap
<xfq> w3c/
<gb> Issue 694 Gap could be misunderstood as a literal typographic gap (by YDX-2147483647)
xfq: basically issue 694, we have many gap analysis documents
… could be misunderstood as a literal typographic gap
addison: any disagreement?
Add a JavaScript Internationalization article
<xfq> https://
xfq: above on JS intl point, r12a gave some comments
… JS has intl object for i18n
<addison> https://
xfq: listing features could be useful for others
… MDN doc is also useful for developers, I've found
addison: posted URL of MDN start page for Intl object
… best to summarise, or any good way
… some document like how to use Intl object effective way for Web content
… could be easy to list existing document as references
xfq: in MDN lots of information are listed as reference
addison: every single options are properly documented
xfq: on our point of view, we have lots of articles on Web applications creators, and internationalized web sites
… this is on creating web sites, and Intl are oriented as guide
r12a: suggesting to @@@4 MDN documents
<xfq> https://
xfq: will continue working, and get comments possibly next week or some
glossary structure with normative and non-normative
<xfq> https://
<xfq> w3c/
<gb> Pull Request 84 Divide the glossary by normativity (by xfq)
xfq: preview of PR on alpha version of separating glossary into normative and non-normative
… based on what we want to transform document into
… split terms into two sections
… terms with entry in INFRA or some other places as normative
… did not change any of definitions
… removed alphabetic index
… created two search boxes for convinience to put keywords for two sections
xfq: would include both terms and definitions, or I could include option to hide definitions
addison: without exact term in mind, you can find via keyword in definitions
addison: we should have higher level of conversation first
… which term should fall into which
… having two words list, harder to seek
… currently division is not solid, like some normative definitions refers non-normative
xfq: granurality of normative section have some restriction on respec
<Bert> (I think I'd prefer a single list, and the normative terms flagged some way, maybe by giving them a border...)
addison: some non-normative definitions in whole normative document, with some note on divisions
… we have to explain terms and definitions in non-normative as useful definitions
… we actually want to use these terms in other our documents
<xfq> https://
<xfq> it adds a <mark style="background-color: yellow; font-weight: bold;"> to the keyword
addison: we should think with collecting ideas for getting forward
AOB?
[none]