Meeting minutes
Accessibility of Machine Learning and Generative AI.
<Joshue108> JW: There is a CFC still open till tomorrow
<Joshue108> JS: I'm expecting we will publish
<Joshue108> JS: We welcome comments
<Joshue108> JW: There have been editorial comments - expecting a Pull request
<Joshue108> JW: Any updates?
<Joshue108> JS: From whom?
<Joshue108> JW: W3C staff
<Joshue108> JS: Roy will be using the editors draft
<Joshue108> JS: I want to make sure we don't have typos etc
<Joshue108> RR: There have been suggestions around ethical principles and harms.
<Joshue108> RR: In the GH repository.
<Joshue108> JOC: We should talk about the comments from Patrick and Hidde etc
<Joshue108> JS: A spell check needs to be run
<Joshue108> JW: Not sure about the source of the PR
<Joshue108> JS: Not worried about that
<Joshue108> JW: Not aware of the comments what are they?
<Joshue108> w3c/
<gb> Issue 13 AI and Machine Learning - note fails to discuss ethical aspects of using AI (by hidde)
<Joshue108> w3c/
<gb> Issue 12 AI and Machine Learning - Note title is slightly misleading/incorrect (by patrickhlauke)
issues: need to check for typos
issues: first issue is that title is misleading/incorrect
issues argues that ML and generative AI is high level and no specific accessibiity
janina: editorial suggesiton, change from 'of' to 'in'
josh: do think we have more and will change
josh: happy to comment
josh responded to issue
Github issue 2:
concern over note not discussing ethical aspects of using AI
including sustanability regarding envrionmental concerns,
copyright violations
and liklihood of bias
suggeiston to add an ethical considerations information
janina: some out of scope but ae focusing on people with disaibities
janian and scott suggest similar response to previous issue regarding liklihood of increasing scope
josh: W3C has a report regaidng AI and ethics, can be referenced
josh posted response
roy: also some discussion on overlays
<janina> https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> https://
<Joshue108> scribe+ JW: I dont see an issue at this point
<Joshue108> RR: No issue but giving you a heads up - if they do arise we should prepare
<Joshue108> JW: Announcement text?
jason: announcement text, W3C will be writing it need to be aware of specifc questions for reviewers
editors note and scope section woudl be one
introduciton section and explanations of background woudl be another,
third is accessibility considerations
janina: ask specifically what should this document cover / expand our scope?
plan to workthorugh focus reas next week
jason: mailing list good as wel
jason: so let's look at the three areas and focus on questions within them
1. scope to the scope identified. what else woudl you like to add for us
in intro seciton, ask about definitions
2. introducion specific secton
3. from seciotn 3 use cases: provide us use cases, provide yoru concerns
<Joshue108> JOC: Lets do this on list!
Miscellaneous topics.
<janina> https://