W3C

– DRAFT –
WoT Plugfest/Testing

22 February 2023

Attendees

Present
Cristiano_Aguzzi, Ege_Korkan, Jan_Romann, Kaz_Ashimura, Luca_Barbato, Michael_Koster, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
luca_barbato

Meeting minutes

Minutes

<kaz> Feb-8

McCool: we agree at the end of the meeting to to update the 27th
… more typos fixed

no objections to publish

Quick updates

Playground update

Ege: Playground update, TM support
… Validation of the TD using the fully expanded TM
… To be used in the TestFest

McCool: Impact on people reporting manually

Ege: No problems

Ege: Problems with stable url though

McCool: Stable url are a problem

McCool: Experimenting with ip cameras
… Adding rtsp support to camera object
… rtsp is universal for ip/security camera

Luca: RTSP verbs have both mapping to property or action

McCool: Offline discussion about protocol binding for it

Kaz: 2 comments or maybe questions
… ip camera as item for potential plugfest in the next charter

McCool: Important for AI
… input for future work

Kaz: Can we make a report from the previous testfest. Given we've got updated implementation reports, we can summarize the situation with links to those implementation reports at the end of the Testfest page.?

McCool: It can be future work
… for the next agenda

Ege: I have past experience with streaming as well

McCool: RTMP is not fully standardized

Luca: it does have a standard though

McCool: RTSP is more widespread for the IP camera

McCool: MATTER might focus on HLS/DASH

Kaz: It could be a potential topic for the next charter

McCool: Agreed to make an issue about it for the next WoT WG Charter

<kaz> s|(MEETING TITLE)|WoT Plugfest/Testing|

<kaz> wot-charter-drafts issue 60 - Streaming

PR & Issues

McCool: 4 PRs

PR 535

<kaz> PR 535 - Add CoAP and UDP-related DNS-SD assertions to Discovery template.csv file

McCool: fixing things in Discovery for DiD regarding the assertions in the spec
… some results to be updated
… merge it and look at refining in the Discovery meeting later

PR 534

<kaz> PR 534 - Add manual.csv for DNS-SD CoAP implementation

McCool: another one is fixing the template and updating the results as well

Jan: Just joined

McCool: I prefer if Jan fixes the PR to concatenate the two csv

PR 533

<kaz> PR 533 - Update DRAFT-atrisk-explanations.md

McCool: This one is related to the developer meetup
… leave it open and work on it further with Lagally

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/533/files

Lagally: Agreed

PR 528

<kaz> PR 528 - Jan 2023 Result Updates

McCool: The last one will be fixed soon as well

Developer Meeting

<kaz> Developer Meeting logistics

McCool: Change the meeting date to the week of March 27
… Doodle missing

Kaz: I will set up one today

McCool: Week of 20th open for the TestFest
… 2-3 Days of TestFest and focus on Profiles
… include both 20th and 27th in the Doodle

<kaz> s/data to/date to/

McCool: An explanatory document for the At-Risk items
… is needed

<Ege> wot-thing-description PR 1758 - Updating at risk assertions in the main body

Ege: Update the TD spec section

McCool: The document should be a stand alone md
… objectives for the developer meetup
… one purpose is having more developers
… the other is receive feedback from the developers
… less focus on promotion and more on gathering feedback
… focus on finalising the current spec
… the md files should help experienced developers in reporting assertions

<Zakim> Ege, you wanted to react to Ege

Ege: More about talking with developers than advertising

McCool: Do not post on twitter but have a targeted list of developers

cris: Why are we limiting it to implementor, we could expand to newcomers

McCool: We have 1 hour for a large amount of items

McCool: Better to cut down to a narrow scope
… other meeting for newcomers

Kaz: agree with McCool, and think we could clarify also the name and scope of the meetup

Kaz: maybe Testing Meeting or Assertion Meeting? Assertion

McCool: Let's call it "Assertion Resolution Meeting" then.

McCool: Making a list of developers to invite
… first who already presented their implementations
… then SDO collaborators
… e.g., ECHONET

Ege: Who maintains implementations

Testfest

McCool: We target March, let's capture some input

Ege: We have a CG meetup 23rd March as well, avoid conflict

<Ege> https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/wot/calendar#card-e72912b5-3087-440e-950e-886acbab645d is the conflict

McCool: Week of the 20th, 2-3 days
… 1h per day
… use the Doodle from the devmeeting to avoid conflicts

Kaz: Maybe we need yet another Doodle for this Testfest as well.

McCool: One for 20th and one for 27th

ACTION: Kaz to generate two doodle polls, one for Testfest during the week of March 20 and another for Assertion Resolution Meeting during the week of March 27

<kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of action items

  1. Kaz to generate two doodle polls, one for Testfest during the week of March 20 and another for Assertion Resolution Meeting during the week of March 27
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 210 (Wed Jan 11 19:21:32 2023 UTC).