W3C

– DRAFT –
WoT Security

28 November 2022

Attendees

Present
Jan_Romann, Jiye_Park, Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
kaz

Meeting minutes

Minutes

Nov-21

McCool: (goes through the minutes)

approved

Publications - Wide Reviews

Architecture

transitions issue 474 - CR Request for Web of Things (WoT) Architecture 1.1 - McCool's comments

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/security-request/issues/27 is still open....

Kaz: quickly skimmed the issue 474, and think Ralph is OK with our getting quick review for the term of "Trusted Environment" and that review should be really quick given the concept for the term was already available within the original draft before the Wide Reviews

Jiye: would like to know about the background a bit more

McCool: (explains what has been happening)

McCool's latest comments

McCool: (sends an email to Sam and Dan to ask them for a quick review on the term as well)

Discovery

<McCool> CR Request for Web of Things (WoT) Discovery

<McCool> Review comment tracker for WoT Discovery

<McCool> https://www.w3.org/PM/horizontal/review.html?shortname=wot-architecture

McCool: two issues for Security which need to be reviewed were mis-labeled

wot-architecture Issue 643 - Finding a place to put the security paragraph in the bindings chapter

wot-architecture Issue 672 - Review Security and Privacy Considerations

McCool: I wrongly added the label "security-needs-resolution" though this issue is not added by the Security Reviewers
… unfortunately, we can't remove the label ourselves
… I'll ask Sam about this point as well

Thing Description

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1497

McCool: no problem with Security/Privacy Wide Reviews

Kaz: what was wrong with the above issue for TD?

McCool: also has wrongly added "privacy-needs-resolution" label

McCool: have asked Sam about this one as well

Testing and Implementation Reports

TD

<McCool> wot-thing-description PR 1752 - Update Implementation Report (Indexing)

McCool: problems with the order of assertions, etc., have been fixed
… (shows the rendered version of the draft Implementation Report)

rendered version of the draft implementation report

McCool: most of the features at risk are related to security
… we have a Testfest on Dec 12-15
… just in two weeks
… can try some of the security features which are at risk now
… assertions for TD are priority
… Jiye, can you tell what Siemens could do?

Jiye: need to check within Siemens

McCool: some i18n features as well there
… some of the assertions are around the policy

[adjourned]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 196 (Thu Oct 27 17:06:44 2022 UTC).