Meeting minutes
Minutes
approved
Architecture Transition Request
transitions issue 474 - CR Request for Web of Things (WoT) Architecture 1.1
McCool: got comments on Wide Reviews from Ralph
Trusted Environment
<McCool> three PRs: 686, 747, and 781
McCool: how long would it take for an additional review?
Kaz: not sure
… it depends on their availability
… but we can ask them to review the additional part quickly if the change is limited
… from my view point, what we should do is:
… 1. see whether there is any content added after the wide review conclusion or not
… 2. if there really is any addition, we need to see if it's really needed
… 3. if we can remove it, that's fine
… 4. or if we really need the addition, we need to ask them for an additional review for that part
McCool: regarding #1, I've checked the timing
… the PR on Trusted Environment was really added one month later the wide review conclusion
Kaz: which PR?
<McCool> PR 781 - Define Trusted Environment
McCool: that is just a definition of a term, "Trusted Environment"
Kaz: in that case, we need to think about whether we really need this definition or not as #2 above
McCool: don't think we really need this definition
<McCool> https://
Kaz: would suggest you check with Ralph by sending an email about our proposal before responding on the GitHub Issue directly
McCool: ok
Kaz: also, we should check with Lagally as well first
McCool: yeah
Updates to Security and Privacy Guidelines
WoT Security and Privacy Guidelines
McCool: public Note was published on 6 Nov 2019
… we need thorough review
… updated definitions, references, etc.
… should remove the reference to the Best Practices
Kaz: meaning not the "6. References to Existing Security Best Practices" section but the reference to our own WoT Security Best Practices document. Right?
McCool: right
section 6 - References to Existing Security Best Practices
WoT Security Best Practices document
McCool: it has not been published yet
… (goes through the WoT Security and Privacy Guidelines Note)
… we need to have a plan
… discussion on testing procedure, etc.
… my own general feeling is the document has good content
<McCool> wot-security issue 209 - Update "Security and Privacy Guidelines" prior to 2022 PR transitions
McCool: the issue was generated in August
… didn't have bandwidth to update the Note
… note that all the normative/necessary information has been included in the normative specs themselves
Testing
McCool: what is the situation for the December Testfest?
Kaz: preparing for it
… think we should see the implementation status for WoT Architecture and WoT Profile
… but for that purpose, we need to sort the assertion table again based on the appearance order rather than the ID name
… so that people can tell the context easily
[adjourned]