– DRAFT –
Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference

Agenda Review & Announcements

CSS CfC

Matthew_Atkinson: call for consensus in progress

<Matthew_Atkinson> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0021.html

Matthew_Atkinson: it is only open until end of the day. please vote

WCAG CfC

<Matthew_Atkinson> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0023.html

Matthew_Atkinson: we have 2.2 CI horizontal review, CFC. this one will also open until end of the day.

janina: I will take a second look on the content.

janina: we may need to re-run for the CFC if we need to make any content change

Adapt CR

Matthew_Atkinson: Janina can go in the details about the process.

Matthew_Atkinson: we have a conformance section in specs of dos and donts. we have a CFC for the people to adapt the changes.

janina: this requires documents consensus. I expect that pull requests will be merged soon so that we can send a CFC

<Roy> https://w3c.github.io/adapt/content/#conformance

Roy: I have reviewed two pull requests and merged it already.

Roy: janina can use the conformance section to review

Roy: there is a link in the implementation report. I will fix all of the issues and merge it into the pull request

New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22

A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review

new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html

Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned

APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html

Matthew_Atkinson: we need to address this. we mentioned about it last week. we want to get feedback form the people

Matthew_Atkinson: this is about formatting on all charters

Matthew_Atkinson: thats going to be addressed separately. should concentrate if we have any question on the content. if anyone has any questions/concerns on this proposed charter, please let us know

janina: we should give a chance people to read it

janina: there was an assumption built to the charter. it assumes that 2.2 went to the CR which becomes the w3 recommendations

janina: it talks about working on 3.0 which seems it all about. we are only 2 weeks away from TPAC and we still do not have CR ready.

janina: publishing 2.2 in CR doesn't mean we are done.

janina: I think we should split the advisory group into two part. one can work on 2.2 and other can focus on 3.0

Matthew_Atkinson: wonder if we are practicing section 4 success criteria

Matthew_Atkinson: this section doesn't make any sense in reality

janina: APA agrees that WCAG is important and 2.2 and 3.0 should be allowed to continue unimpeded

we want to see 2.2. and 3.0 move forward

DRAFT RESOLUTION: APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and WCAG 3 important for accessibility and wishes to say each of them proceed unimpeded.

<janina> +1

+1

<mike_beganyi> +1

<Matthew_Atkinson> +1

<Fredrik> +1

janina: W3 policy requires disclosure on intellectual properly and that has to happen during CR.

janina: advisory committee takes 30 days to approve the proposed recommendations.

Matthew_Atkinson: do you think there ar any other option to extended existing charter or rewrite it.

janina: there should be two groups

janina: they could take the charter from 2018 and change the date.

Matthew_Atkinson: extend the current charter or split the group?

janina: lets assume one year extension. at that point if it still has not happened, what are we going to do?

Matthew_Atkinson: another option (arising from group discussion) is not going for 2.2

TPAC22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022

APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html

<janina> +1 to current draft charter not meaningful

Matthew_Atkinson: who agrees that current charter is not meaningful?

+1

<janina> +1

<mike_beganyi> +1

<Fredrik> +1

<Matthew_Atkinson> +1

Matthew_Atkinson: where do you think we should go with this?

<janina> DRAFT RESOLUTION: Current draft charter on github is not meaningful path forward

<janina> +1

+1

<Matthew_Atkinson> +1

<mike_beganyi> +1

<Fredrik> +1

RESOLUTION: Current draft charter on github is not meaningful path forward

RESOLUTION: APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and WCAG 3 important for accessibility and wishes to say each of them proceed unimpeded.

TPAC22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022

Matthew_Atkinson: we have scheduled 7 meetings and expecting more to follow

<Matthew_Atkinson> https://www.w3.org/2022/09/TPAC/venue.html