Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
CSS CfC
Matthew_Atkinson: call for consensus in progress
<Matthew_Atkinson> https://
Matthew_Atkinson: it is only open until end of the day. please vote
WCAG CfC
<Matthew_Atkinson> https://
Matthew_Atkinson: we have 2.2 CI horizontal review, CFC. this one will also open until end of the day.
janina: I will take a second look on the content.
janina: we may need to re-run for the CFC if we need to make any content change
Adapt CR
Matthew_Atkinson: Janina can go in the details about the process.
Matthew_Atkinson: we have a conformance section in specs of dos and donts. we have a CFC for the people to adapt the changes.
janina: this requires documents consensus. I expect that pull requests will be merged soon so that we can send a CFC
<Roy> https://
Roy: I have reviewed two pull requests and merged it already.
Roy: janina can use the conformance section to review
Roy: there is a link in the implementation report. I will fix all of the issues and merge it into the pull request
New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html
Matthew_Atkinson: we need to address this. we mentioned about it last week. we want to get feedback form the people
Matthew_Atkinson: this is about formatting on all charters
Matthew_Atkinson: thats going to be addressed separately. should concentrate if we have any question on the content. if anyone has any questions/concerns on this proposed charter, please let us know
janina: we should give a chance people to read it
janina: there was an assumption built to the charter. it assumes that 2.2 went to the CR which becomes the w3 recommendations
janina: it talks about working on 3.0 which seems it all about. we are only 2 weeks away from TPAC and we still do not have CR ready.
janina: publishing 2.2 in CR doesn't mean we are done.
janina: I think we should split the advisory group into two part. one can work on 2.2 and other can focus on 3.0
Matthew_Atkinson: wonder if we are practicing section 4 success criteria
Matthew_Atkinson: this section doesn't make any sense in reality
janina: APA agrees that WCAG is important and 2.2 and 3.0 should be allowed to continue unimpeded
we want to see 2.2. and 3.0 move forward
DRAFT RESOLUTION: APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and WCAG 3 important for accessibility and wishes to say each of them proceed unimpeded.
<janina> +1
+1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Matthew_Atkinson> +1
<Fredrik> +1
janina: W3 policy requires disclosure on intellectual properly and that has to happen during CR.
janina: advisory committee takes 30 days to approve the proposed recommendations.
Matthew_Atkinson: do you think there ar any other option to extended existing charter or rewrite it.
janina: there should be two groups
janina: they could take the charter from 2018 and change the date.
Matthew_Atkinson: extend the current charter or split the group?
janina: lets assume one year extension. at that point if it still has not happened, what are we going to do?
Matthew_Atkinson: another option (arising from group discussion) is not going for 2.2
TPAC22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022
APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html
<janina> +1 to current draft charter not meaningful
Matthew_Atkinson: who agrees that current charter is not meaningful?
+1
<janina> +1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Fredrik> +1
<Matthew_Atkinson> +1
Matthew_Atkinson: where do you think we should go with this?
<janina> DRAFT RESOLUTION: Current draft charter on github is not meaningful path forward
<janina> +1
+1
<Matthew_Atkinson> +1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Fredrik> +1
RESOLUTION: Current draft charter on github is not meaningful path forward
RESOLUTION: APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and WCAG 3 important for accessibility and wishes to say each of them proceed unimpeded.
TPAC22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022
Matthew_Atkinson: we have scheduled 7 meetings and expecting more to follow
<Matthew_Atkinson> https://