Meeting minutes
Previous Minutes
<Sebastian walks over minutes>
Sebastian: mentioning of IEEE contribution should move up
… to ITU-T section
Kaz: fixed
Sebastian: The rest looks good, any objection?
… no objections > approved
Quick updates
Editors' sync-up call on Tuesday
McCool: talked about Extension plan
… https://
… extended by some weeks to give us more time
… it is checked in... but we still need to approve the dates
Sebastian: Yes, since we need a date for the TestFest
McCool: Mid march for TestFest might need to be to be shifted
… Note: it is extended to full 12 months period
<kaz> Wide Review Guide
Sebastian: I looked into "wide review" guidelines
… each task force has to go through the questionnaire
… wonder whether we have to select "WD that is moving to CR soon"
McCool: I suggest "FPWD"
Sebastian: For all documents?
McCool: For some, TD might be different
Sebastian: Wonder also about the required dates to enter? 2 dates?
McCool: date of request and date of deadline
Sebastian: I see, will start with TD
McCool: How long is the review period? 2 months?
… maybe 3 months?
Lagally: Would like to show roadmap of profile/architecture
… <MLagally showing updated roadmap>
… Feb 2, clarify requirements
… identify gaps, 1-2 calls
… contributions to resolve normative gaps, 2 month?
… Jan 23, REC transition
… CR, end of July 2022
… will upload the roadmap
Ege: should be strict about scope: PlugFest vs TestFest
… I suggest to have a PlugFest .. besides TestFest in March
… we did not use Profile in PlugFest before
McCool: ML suggests to have it next to each other
Ege: Suggest to have 2 different weeks
McCool: holiday week March 7, maybe one before and one after this week
… let's discuss this in testing call
Lagally: I can attend only 10 minutes of the testing call
Kaz: Agree, details should be discussed in testing call
WoT Japanese CG updates
Mizushima: kick-off session on Jan 28
… also published on events page
… plan to have events w.r.t. ECHONET and publishing industry
Rechartering and Charter Extensions
IG Rechartering
Sebastian: IG rechartering was accepted
Kaz: W3M is discussing this topic now and I'll work on official announcement later once getting approval
WG Charter Extension
Sebastian: Draft WG Charter for 12mo extension available
… https://
Sebastian: Need horizontal review
Kaz: Talked with PLH
… need to create dedicated issue
… horizontal review from security etc
… PLH asks W3M for 4mo extension for that procedure (horizontal review + AC review following that)
WG Rechartering AFTER the 12mo extension
Sebastian: draft available also
… https://
Lagally: w.r.t. use-cases , we should check our documents
… also w.r.t. ideas of re-chartering
Sebastian: I started to take a look at it already in TD
McCool: I think we need to work on gathering common requirements
Discuss decision process
Sebastian: see https://
… don't know how to proceed
… suggest each task-force should make a decision
… in TD it worked well
McCool: I suggest to have a common norm
… and need to write it down
… proposal is a bit long... need to break things
… maybe document our current procedure
… like a DECISION.md file
… let's talk in chairs call
Lagally: We talked in Arch task force
… editorial issues asynchronously
… for other issues/PR we should do that in the call
McCool: Suggest to think about Ben's proposal
Publications
Sebastian: WoT Use Cases updated Note and TD 1.1 2nd WD to be published. - ongoing
Sebastian: Kaz is working on the documents
McCool: Discovery needs to do that soon also
Kaz: I might need some help from Lagally and Sebastian.. in case
Lagally/Sebastian: +1
Marketing
WoT CG
Sebastian: plan to reactivate WoT Community Group
… need official request
McCool: on web page there is a "nominate" button
<kaz> WoT CG page
McCool: 5 votes also needed
… not sure about 1 chair or more?
Sebastian: I cannot choose anyone ?#
McCool: same for me, Kaz can cominate
… let's ping W3C folks
<kaz> Click "LOGIN TO NOMINATE CHAIRS" button on the participants page
McCool: Should decide on number of chairs
… maybe in marketing call
Lagally: I ask the WoT WG Chairs how many chairs are envisioned for the WoT CG
… decision of working group
McCool: to many chairs complicate decision process
McCool: original idea was one chair.., the one from marketing
… or at least co-chair of marketing
Lagally: I do have different understanding
Kaz: as team W3C contact i would say we should have 1 or 2
… for 3 we need to have a good reason
Liaisons
ITU-T SG20
Sebastian: ITU Webinar on "Architecting the Web of Things" now set for Feb 3 at 09:00 EDT / 15:00 CET, for 2h
… MMC provided slides already
… I still work on my slides
OPC UA
Sebastian: this week there should be a decision w.r.t. new group
… will report next week
TF Reports
McCool: Use Cases, had meeting with C. Perry
Lagally: We had a guest from University of Bologna, .. related to event mechanism
Sebastian: In TD call we will talk about webhook example ..and binding discussions
[adjourned]
McCool: Testing call in 10 minutes