Meeting minutes
<sebastia_> hi all, I will join 30min later. I like to present the Industry 4.0 use case
Minutes
<mlagally_> https://
ml: (goes through the minutes)
<mlagally_> https://
ml: add the link above for "setup the issue" and then approve the minutes
PR 148
PR 148 - Updated liaison chapter
ml: liaison section and acknowledgement section
kaz: wondering about the capitalized "SHOULD" right before the Liaison section
… given the Use Cases and Requirements document is an informative Note, we don't need to use the RFC2119 keywords
ml: right
… (fixes the typo)
kaz: Matsuda-san is working the text for ECHONET
… so let's merge this as the template for that purpose :)
ml: ok
… let's merge this PR and think about further edit after that
kaz: +1
(merged)
Other Issues with the label of "publication-2.0"
Issues marked with "publication-2.0"
ml: (goes through the list of issues)
Issue 104
Issue 104 - Discovery use cases
ml: Discovery use cases
WoT Discovery General Topics and Use Cases
kaz: ideally, it would be better for us to extract several typical use cases from this
… and put them into the use case template
… so that we can include them into the Use Cases and Requirements document
ml: (adds note on that)
Issue 105
Issue 105 - Finalize the section 4.5.1.2 of Health use case
kaz: given this issue is old in March
… and we have description on Privacy Considerations and References already
… we should be able to close this issue
mizu: agree
(closed)
Issue 106
Issue 106 - Finalize the section 4.6.1 of Manufacturing
ml: can be closed as well
(closed)
Issue 108
Issue 108 - Finalize the section 4.6.3 of Manufacturing
mizu: can be closed also
(closed)
Issue 135
Issue 135 - Improve references: Use Specref Database references where available for release 2.0
ml: updates for references based on SpecRef
… we can work on this offline
… all the assignees of the publication-2.0 issues should respond
ACTION: all the assignees to work on the publication-2.0 issues
ACTION: all owners of issues with label publication-2.0 to decide if they can contribute for end of year publication.
PR 90
PR 90 - Industry 4.0 - Motivation for OPC UA Binding
sk: (goes through the PR)
… we already have node-wot as an implementation for WoT
… but still need clarification for Binding
… would like to see the connection among the devices
… OPC-UA has its own security model
kaz: great description
… was also expecting something like this when I asked you to provide a concrete use case during vF2F
… we can think about concrete binding based on this
ml: agree this is a great starting point
ack
… btw, there is a lot of stuff for Industrie 4.0
… so would add some more resources here
sk: can do that
… similar discussion with IoT in general
… my suggestion is being generic as much as possible
ml: For example, there is some generic information about what Industrie 4.0 is like
sk: would like to be independent from that...
ml: maybe some other resources can be referred to
kaz: several additional comments
… having "Industry 4.0" as the title of the use case is confusing
… maybe can say "Smart Manufacturing" which fits with the Industrie 4.0 concept
… also we should add our own considerations for the sections on security, privacy, accessibility, i18n and requirements sections
… in addition to the compatibility with OPC-UA
ml: agree
… maybe we can say "interworking" or something like that for the title
… let's continue the discussion
[adjourned]