– DRAFT –
WoT Plugfest

minutes review from October 13

<McCool> https://www.w3.org/2021/10/13-wot-pf-minutes.html

McCool: any objections to publishing?

<kaz> (no objections, and approved)

PR #197

<kaz> Oct 2021 Test Data Reorg #197

McCool: toumura-san, what are you using if not node-wot?

Toumura: We use Node-RED

McCool: we could group all Node-RED implementations together

Toumura: our system is IDF - IoT Development Framework

McCool: IDF it will be counted as another implementation, so now we have 12

McCool: only Intel provided manual assertions
… where we are missing is mostly new features
… concerned about missing the assertions in csv files
… need to use the new template
… in McCool's branch
… the filename is manual.csv

McCool: are Fujitsu and NHK separate implementations?

Matsukura-san: Fujitsu is our own implementation

McCool: what about NHK and ECHONET?

Kaz: my understanding is that NHK and ECHONET are also their own implementations.

McCool: a number of TDs don't have physical devices associated, may move those out
… will re-run the report

review the report generator workflow

McCool: this should be generalized to be used for discovery, etc.
… will create a new repository for the tool so it can be used in many other testing use cases
… input and results directory are now manually copied but would be better as a submodule
… Kaz, is this OK?

Kaz: putting the necessary tooling resources under a specific repository would be nice

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-tools

McCool: the tools repository already exists and you should have permission to merge there

<Zakim> kaz, you wanted to ask when/how to update the result data, e.g., can wait until we copy the testing tool resources to the wot-tools repo?

Kaz: we need to now ask everyone to update their results

McCool: I still need to fix up some things first and then will invite everyone to update by next week

McCool: are there any more implementation of features needed?
… security features, additional responses
… support for directory TD
… bearer schemes
… Echonet
… are all places where we could get more coverage

Kaz: Netzo mentioned they were already using node-wot

McCool: but maybe they are using features not covered in other implementations

McCool: more coverage over one code base

McCool: will publish an email request for assertions next week
… finally there are implementation descriptions
… will fill in some place holders and we can review and fill in the blanks later

McCool: any other business?

McCool: adjourned