Meeting minutes
minutes review
minutes from last main call https://
any comments, objections?
no
we need to check the minutes from 1st open day https://
any comments, objections?
no
Quick updates
McCool: I was ask to be part of the panel on IoT security at IoT Tech Expo Europe, Nov 30
McCool: any news from WoT Japanese CG?
Tomoaki: Currently prepearing some slides for the CG report during the WoT vF2F on Oct 26th.
McCool: Ege will start chairing Testing call after the TPAC meetings
McCool: This week no TF calls. Next week it is planed to have again regular meetings.
Lagally: We need to cacel Arch/Profile meeting next week due to an conflict
Kaz: Which meetings are cancelled?
McCool: So far only Arch/Profile is cancelled
Kaz: There may a conflict with the TD call since there is a TPAC breakout session
… maybe it is possible to have the call for the first hour
... please note that we should avoid overlaps with breakouts and group meetings for the official TPAC weeks of Oct 18-22 and Oct 25-29, basically
TPAC status and planning
McCool: Tomorrow we will have the open day (day 2) with Netzo and ECHONET. Not sure about SDW yet
McCool: shows the latest schedule of the next TPAC meetings
https://
McCool: ITU-T want to announce 2month in advance about a joint meeing, we are not sure if this still possible for the Dec 13 meeting
McCool: T2TRG will take place on Oct 28, we will have ECHONET presentation tomorrow, and OPC UA will also take place Oct 28
Smart Cities
Kaz: breakout session on Oct 18 at 15UTC and Oct 21 14UTC. Please get registered with them on CVent by searching for "Smart Cities".
Testing Report
McCool: I provided a PR for the latest testing report
… as you can see some tests failed, implementations needed
https://
Lagally: how about profile testing?
... I think, we need to have a stable version of the Profile befor going to implementation
... I do not share this. The protocol binding part is stable, but, the data model part needs further clarification.
Kaz: Before discussing how to test the Profile spec, we should fix the content of the spec itself. So I'd suggest we should continue collaborative discussion during the Editors call.
... I'll generate a doodle poll to see the better slot for the Editors call
Daniel: I have similar point like Ege, actions is kind of underspecified in the TD. In the Profile a specific behavior is expected
Publication planning
Kaz: regarding the WG Chartering, do we prefer 6-month extension before rechartering to officially re-chartered?
... we need to clarify which way to go, recharter or charter extension
adjourn
<kaz> [Plugfest call in 10mins]