Meeting minutes
https://
Lifecycle
Zitao_Wang: issues and PRs
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-lifecycle/issues/15
Zitao_Wang: the TAG gave us feedback
QingAn: sent a PR
https://
Zitao_Wang: maybe you can restructure this document
… @@
… mapping to existing Web specifications such as Service Workers and Page Visibility
QingAn: I can add some text about relationship with Manifest in the Abstract
QingAn: any thoughts?
xfq: We did not document the installation process in the document
martin: In the Manifest spec we have the "start page" as launch page. In the Packaging spec, we include the algorithm to fetch and load/launch a MiniApp. We can include cross references among specifications.
QingAn: do you think we should add some text in Packaging first?
martin: should link to Packaging and perhaps the other way around
… indicating the algorithms are in the other spec
… I volunteer to do it next week
TAG feedback 3: "It doesn't look like you're referencing ServiceWorker either - is there a Miniapp state which makes use of ServiceWorker?"
QingAn: I will add "Whenever possible, the specification should provide a mapping to existing Web specifications such as Service Workers and Page Visibility." to the Abstract of the spec
Zitao_Wang: I agree
TAG feedback 4: "When a Miniapp is launched what origin can it be said to have, with regard to the web's security model? That would seem to be important from a lifecycle point of view."
QingAn: the origin concept in miniapps is quite different from websites
… any thoughts?
Zitao_Wang: the security of a miniapp is controlled by the hosting platform
Zitao_Wang: I'm not very sure if we need to reflect this in the Lifecycle spec
QingAn: we need somewhere to say the super app or the OS should be responsible to check the app's origin and security
… could be in the explainer
… not sure it should be in the spec
xfq: it's a valid concern for other specs as well
QingAn: we can update the explainers of the specs
… and add something in the white paper
Zitao_Wang: I agree
… we can reflect it in the white paper
QingAn: we can add this in our white paper revision plan
TAG feedback 5: "We also note that the Page Lifecycle document that you point to as comparison is out of date and itself needs to be updated (in particular to reflect installation via Manifest, which is missing)."
QingAn: I did not find a newer version than the one in the explainer
QingAn: need help from xfq
xfq: I will look into it
Manifest
https://
Zitao_Wang: we need to add security, privacy, and accessibility sections to all the normative specifications
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/pull/33
xfq: I added a pull request template based on Web App Manifest. Can we merge this?
Zitao_Wang: great work
Zitao_Wang: we can add it to other specs
xfq: I'll merge this PR
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/pull/29
[martin introduces the changes]
Zitao_Wang: reviewed this
… LGTM
… any objections?
[Silence]
Zitao_Wang: we'll merge it then
martin: thank you
Packaging
https://
martin: mainly editorial changes
… the current status is to assume that we use standard HTML CSS and so on
… we're splitting the spec into the packaging itself and its content
… template, markup etc.
… agree we should include accessibility section
… not very relevant for this spec though
… in my opinion this is solid to move forward
… when we add the accessibility section
Zitao_Wang: I reviewed it
… we agreed to split this spec into two specs
… do you this is mature enough for FPWD?
martin: @@
xfq: we need a CfC
Zitao_Wang: any objection to merging this PR and move it to FPWD?
[Silence]
Widget
https://
Canfeng_Chen: We'll add more use cases on more examples of MiniApp platforms
Canfeng_Chen: Regarding the second point, we don’t quite understand what Dan meant
Ming_Zu: Dan is on vacation
TPAC Planning
<Angel> https://
https://
xfq: TPAC 2021 Meeting Registration is now open
https://
xfq: please propose agenda items
xfq: such as the white paper
xfq: will look into the possibility of joint meetings
angel: infoshare
… the miniapps CG will use the second hour of our TPAC meeting time
… Oct 28 2021, 12:00 UTC
… xfq can send the invitation
[Adjourned]