<sarah_higley> I can type :D
zakim next item
[New Issue Triage](https://
James: this is a great first issue
Jory will do this
[Deep Dive planning](https://
jamesn: next deep dive is the link above, we don't have anything else yet
please let jamesn know if anyone has a topic
github.com/ w3c/ aria/ issues/ 1482)
jamesn: we don't yet have any requests from ourWG for cross-group meetings. Let us know soon if you have one, we are running out of time
jamesn Oct-25-29 is the timing for joint meetings
jamesn there are currenty 13 proposed breakout sessions
JaEun sessions can be open to TPAC only or public
jamesn perhaps we could have a plenary on latest for ARIA APG and AT
cyns would like to do an AOM session
<Jemma> [optional] Timeslot: one slot at 7am UTC, 2pm UTC, or 3pm UTC any day except Wednesday
<Jemma> @cyns AOM session would be great!
7AM PST (GMT -8) is the timeslot if you only want to present once
jamesn its best to submit proposals by Oct 8
Any w3C member can submit a proposal.
jamesn The working group sessions for TPAC week would be a good time for deep dives where we want a lot of participation, e.g. Data Viz
cyns it sould be great to get the SVG WG folks into the data viz talk
jamesn will propose a data viz session with SVG, cyns will talk AOM, Matt will organize APG
[Updating ARIA 1.2 due to IDL implementations (exit and re-enter CR?)](https://
github.com/ w3c/ aria/ issues/ 1598)
jamesn there is a pr (#1611) for this with a few outstanding comments
jamesn will update fix the HTML URIs
scott O re: "get" vs "getting" this idea is new to our spec, jsut wanted to see if we should define this
jamesn prefers not to define these in ARIA, but would be for referencing an external definition (Web IDL? HTML?)
scott O doesn't want this to be blocking
jamesn will get this merged and into CR
[When is hidden content taken into calculation of name and description?](https://
github.com/ w3c/ accname/ issues/ 57)
jamesn (PR: https://
sarah_higley why don't hidden elements use the same computation as non-hidden elements?
jamesn the issue is the browser not understanding if children of hidden nodes are explicitly hidden or not
sarah_higley it sounds like we have both a conceptually inconsistent thing AND a browser issue
<cyns> Found WebIDL definitions of getter and setter, linked in issue https://
cyns this approach is the one that is possible for Apple
sarah_higley it would be preferable to not need to understand browser internals to understand name resolution
jamesn reliying on these internals may be the only path to consistency
<Jemma> +1 to james' suggestion
jamesn would like to hear from Aaron on this
jamesn I was suggesting that we say "if the current node is RENDERED"
<Jemma> to resolve this PR, using html definition rendered
cyns let's get JamesC and AaronL
<Jemma> +1 for distinguishing hidden info in note section.
cyns we can and should reference the HTML definition concerning hidden vs. rendered
<Jemma> visibilty hidden rendered.
Matt_King ARIA has generally considered things hidden in relation to CSS display none, are we changing that?
cyns because the Apple implementation hinges on RENDERED we need to use that
Matt_King wants to be sure we don't make authors chase the definition of rendered to understand this
jamesn cyns can you ping jamesc and aaronl about this?
this = https://
jamesn would like people to comment on his review comment