Meeting minutes
Ege will be back Sept 20. The planed session about protocol binding will be held on Sept. 22
minutes check
<kaz> Aug-4
any objections?
no
PR overview
PR 1151
TD signature https://
Oliver provided a review
McCool: no time yet for review it. Will do it for next time
some examples would be good
maby a nice diagram would good for clearification. There is an example such as from EXI canonical
https://
PR 1167
<kaz> fix: fix RDF triples example from Thing description json-ld 1.1 #1167
next PR fix RDF triples example from Thing description json-ld 1.1
no news here
McCool: there should be no metadata in the id value
e.g., "id": "urn:dev:ops:32473-WoTLamp-1234"
same is also true
this recommendation should be mentioned in the security consideration sectopion
MM will provide an issue
Kaz: we should have a joint meeting with the DID WG
PR 1205
Fix issues in TM schema generation script https://
waiting for Ege's feedback
<McCool> just created issue for URL/Id not having metadata: https://
Add queryaction and cancelaction operations https://
still WIP, we should provide some comments about this PR and about the query naming
<McCool> the readme should list specific files under context and ontology that are autogenerated
<McCool> sorry. have to drop - will talk again soon
check issues
Issue 1199
Small incoherence in forms Thing Description core vocabulary https://
we will replace the sentance with Ege's proposal
Issue 1202
next issue: unit for human-readable / display purposes or as semantic annotation?
https://
Cristiano: support also to use the unit mainly for semantic purposes
Koster: units for human purposes typically have more information as a single value like symbl, the full name, pointer etc
Issue 1214
next issue: TD File Extension Convention https://
Cristiano: how about extend the IANA registry with .td.json since it says "File extension(s)"
Kaz: we should talk with PLH about this
… also please remember W3C Process 2021 will include the capability of registry handling ourselves
<dape> https://
Daniel: JSON-LD also used the .jsonld. Maybe this was the motivation to use the single dot form with .jsontd
Daniel: Sarif uses .sarif and .sarif.json
Kaz: again, let's talk with PLH
… I personally don't think we should change the file extension definition given the old definition is included in the official REC
Issue 1200
Is there a need for invokeanyaction/queryallactions operations? #1200
Sebastian: since Ben is not here, would suggest we postpone this issue
also additional descriptions on Hypermedia Controls
(some discussion)
Kaz: in any ways, we need Ben and Ege for further discussion. right?
Sebastian: right
Daniel: just wanted to remind that there would be possible security issues on the dynamic approach
Cristiano: right
Sebastian: would ask McCool as well about his opinion
Issue 878
Describing initial connection #878
Sebastian: (goes through the issue)
… we should have a PR
Kaz: so we should add the "need PR" label to this
Sebastian: ok
(kaz added "PR needed" label)
Issue 1195
Cristiano: this would allow people better persistence
Sebastian: (adds comments)
… instead using the IP address at the interaction level. the base can be used
… should check if there is no conflict
Issue 1215
Specify format of additional information for TM-to-TD conversion? #1215
Cristiano: (summarizes the issue)
… I'm OK with this process itself
… but some remaining questions
Sebastian: how to create TDs?
… many ways/tools to handle this
AOB
Philipp: wondering about SenML
… IETF spec for sensor data
Kaz: given the Editors of this spec include Ari and Carsten, we can simply talk with them about possible binding during the vF2F meeting at TPAC
… we're still finalizing the joint sessions in general :)
Philipp: should I generate some proposal for binding templates?
Sebastian: not really sure
… what do you think, Koster?
Koster: we should think about possible binding
… that's a good issue
… maybe more study needed
Kaz: we're out of time, and would suggest we bring this topic to the main call next week as well
Sebastian: yeah, let's continue the discussion next week
[adjourned]