Meeting minutes
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
Agenda Review & Announcements
BG: discussion on turning on captions - need to have a chair made host
BG: any other reviews or announcements?
GZ: have discussed personalization and media queries Lvl 5. Has a student who has done a great PoC - includes some features we've looked for. Student has a polyfil if interested
… Student could come and do a presentation either for here, or for another group
BG: thinks personalization would be interested. Open question - anyone else?
<paul_grenier> +1 interested
JF: thinks that APA should host this and invite other interested parties
MC: we can invite people to any meeting on a one-off basis
BG: not sure if we have anything critical - Propose to work with Gottfried to arrange a call
GZ: Can work with student to do that
BG: can we shoot for next week? will that be enough time?
GZ: can investigate and respond tomorrow
JS: do we know who we want to invite
BG: share with AG WG?
JS: suggest we spend some time on a call - invite as many as we can think of, and then maybe even create a brief demo video
GZ: student already made a video for thesis - in German with english Captions/sub-titles
BG: plan for 2 weeks for now? (March 10)
GZ: will need to check with student
BG: Any other announcements?
<fredrik_fischer> Sorry, for some reason my mic is out of joint. How much time should be allocated for Mar 10?
<Gottfried> Video with demo of my student's work: https://
Rechartering CfC:
<fredrik_fischer> Thanks!
BG: we have a CfC - most agreed but a few editorial changes needed to be made
… so some minor updates to charter
<becky> https://
BG: believe that because these were simply editorial changes no need for another CfC. Next step is to send to W3M review
BG: note that some start and end dates remain TBC
Task Force Updates
BG: anyone who can provide updates?
<Fazio> Nothing in COGA
PG: Pronunciation are moving ahead to complete our FPWD - target end of this week early next week
<Fazio> still working through issues on our Making Content Usable doc
BG: Personalization - moving through issues to prepare for CfC for CR - slogging thrrough issues
JO: RQTF had a good call - RAUR almost ready. couple of i's to dot and t's to cross with XAUR.
… interesting conversations around 'conversational applications' (sic?)
JS: we also discussed a color workshop
… hoping to put together a presentation to offer to workshop, but unable to do that.
Seeking an APA member to participate - looking to set up virtual workshop sessions (+interactive), and believe there are at least 2 items of interest
… daltonization and flash mitigation - can those be addressed in the user-agent space?
<becky> https://
JS: workshop in April/May - schedule not yet announced
DF: some small editorial updates on Content Usable
FAST Progress
<fredrik_fischer> @JF: like your responses to it at least. And your wit. ;)
JO: Michael and I have been meeting regularly - making good progress. Have some questions that we'll want to surface (shortly)
we'll be seeking input - want buy-in and feedback
MC: Looking to restart Functional Requirements group
… there is a connection here with WCAG 3 and other activities - we have ideas on how that would work, but want the feedback
… working on a database to illustrate a demo - almost there
Final review of Web Auth issue #1557
<becky> https://
<becky> https://
BG: we had a CfC that we responded to. Group has closed our issue and provided an accessibility section
Thanks to paul for responding to questions
BG: [reads aloud their edit]
BG: we need to close the loop here - note we've reviewed response and then officially close it
PG: happy with changes - makes it clear for implementors
<fredrik_fischer> I'm very happy with the changes, too. Looking forward to implementations.
<fredrik_fischer> Thanks for the good work Paul!
BG: thanks to Paul for that
New Charters Review
MC: web auth issue has been dealt with
<MichaelC> PROPOSED Web Application Security Working Group Charter
MC: a new charter: web applications security WG
a re-charter
[MC reviews key elements of the new charter]
MC: includes a section on a11y impacts, but no liason to APA
but given they added an a11y section, suggest we let them be
MC: they have a hook if we need to pursue
BG: Fine with charter and not having a direct link to APA
JS: also agree - fine as is. This group/community have been responsive to our concerns and feedback
Horizontal Review Issues Tracker
<MichaelC> [css-ruby-1] What properties apply to annotation containers?
MC: there is a CSS Ruby item we discussed last week
JF: This *may* have an impact on Pronunciation
JF & PG subscribed to that issue
new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
MC: new on TR - ePub accessibility 1.1 and ePub TEchniques 1.1
BG: suspect twe don't need to review - any thoughts?
+1 to being comfortable with that work
<MichaelC> EPub Accessibility 1.1
<MichaelC> EPUB Accessibility Techniques 1.1
CSS Update (Amy) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
BG: Amy sent regrets, but provided this feedback
<becky> Amy provided the following comment: Update: Issue created in CSSWG repo to address people-first language in Accessibility Concerns section of CSS Color Module Level 4. https://
JF: leave this in Amy's hands
Actions Checkin (Specs)
ACTION 2282
Action: 2282
<becky> https://
JS: believe we're promoting longer descriptions using summary/details
[process discussion]
BG: will take care of that - will add link to ARIA Accessible Description
BG: will issue a CfC on that comment
… reminder that everyone stay on top of their assigned actions
[discussion on ACTIONS maintenance]
+1 to closing ACTIONS OBE
Other Business
[crickets]
BG: give back 10 minutes
<fredrik_fischer> Thanks for a great meeting! And bon appetit, Becky!