<LisaSeemanKest> regrets eA and Abi
www.w3.org/ WAI/ GL/ task-forces/ coga/ wiki/ PlanningPage#Timelines_and_
Jenny found designer to take on task of developing images
Mockup coming in next week or so
LS: EA rewriting personas, simplifying them
Roy: created pull request in Git for parrt 1
LS: Do we like idea 2.2 icons?
<LisaSeemanKest> assuming the check box to the left is empty
KA: html doesn't usually check boxes it puts an x
KA: line up selected and unselected images
<LisaSeemanKest> apove new concpt
<kirkwood> agree they should be grouped its a bit confusing as is
JK: group in same states to reduce confusion. Add space or line separating them
LS: more whitespace or line?
Jenny: Only whitespace but not sure
<LisaSeemanKest> david is netrual
LS 4 like or no?
<Jennie> +1 if the letter I can be with the format so that it has the tops and bottoms showing so it doesn't look like an L
<LisaSeemanKest> John is +1 as in good enogh
Issue 136 - Use Person First Language when referring to autistic people
Terminology preferences are going to arise
Rachael, cultural variations are likely
JK: government sector has same language struggle: peson first language or other?
<LisaSeemanKest> say autistic people and add a note in the deffintion that langage is shifting
Jenny: place note at beginning to mitigate negative connotations, add it was chosen with fedback frrom community
<LisaSeemanKest> note goes in the glossary and deffintion - that needs to be aproved
<LisaSeemanKest> person first language with 2 notes
<LisaSeemanKest> autistic people language with 2 notes
<Rachael> David: I am happy to get more feedback from the broader community.
<Rachael> Lisa: He's given a number of sources of advocacy groups. There are though different advocacy groups.
<Rachael> ...David, do you want to take an action to write to him?
<Rachael> DAvid: Yes
Action: David to ask autsim speeks
<trackbot> Created ACTION-332 - Ask autsim speeks [on David Fazio - due 2021-01-21].
Issue 162 - about other groups https://
lists.w3.org/ Archives/ Public/ public-cognitive-a11y-tf/ 2021Jan/ 0032.html
<kirkwood> think you will find there is not consensus in the autism community https://
<kirkwood> sorry worong link
LS: non-native speakers ae out of scope
KA: EO often uses overarching language "beneficial for all people"
<Rachael> +1 to emphasizing good for eveyone in the introduction but not elsewhere.
<LisaSeemanKest> go ahead of emphisin in the introduction but notmore elswere
LS: Issue 145 spanish speaking group, didn't realize ADHD was included. Maybe we need to clarify
<stevelee> I think we try to avoid listing specific medical terms? They change and we might miss some
<Rachael> A link to the email with the wording is at https://
<LisaSeemanKest> do we aprove?
LS: concerned ADHD wasn't clear
<kirkwood> this includes, but is not limited to, …
<Jennie> +1 to John Kirkwood's addition
different cultures categorize disability different
Racael: Abstract and intro
<LisaSeemanKest> add langage to Abstract and intro and then add sentence about langage shifiting
<Rachael> +1 to John K's suggestion.
<LisaSeemanKest> add langage to Abstract and intro adding"not limited to" and then add sentence about langage shifiting
<krisannekinney> +1 to John Kirkwood's suggestion
<JohnRochford> +1 tp Kirkwood's suggestion
LS: cognitive accessibility not written about
Jenny: Was removed from glossary
JennLS: cognitive disability shouldn't be added
<Jennie> Background about People with Cognitive and Learning Disabilities, Accessibility, and the web - like this?
<LisaSeemanKest> we change the name of
<LisaSeemanKest> "Background about People with Learning and Cognitive Disabilities and the
<LisaSeemanKest> "Background about People with Learning and Cognitive Disabilities,
<LisaSeemanKest> and the Web"
Topic is broader than just coga
<Jennie> -1 unless cognitive and learning disabilities
<Rachael> Background about People with Cognitive and Learning Disabilities, Accessibility and the Web
<Jennie> thank you!
rrs agent, make minutes