Meeting minutes
Agenda
McCool: Agenda bashing
Minutes review, https://www.w3.org/2020/12/16-wot-minutes.html
McCool: Spatial data joint call
… some people gave emails
Kaz: is properly organized
McCool: IETF
Koster: TODO on my side
… working on it
McCool: OPC-UA liaison
… should discuss all liaisons today -> updated agenda
McCool: Comments on minutes?
no objections -> minutes approved
Quick updates
McCool: Joint calls coming up
… Spatial data on the web, next Tuesday
… see https://
… main topics: AR use cases
… proposed agenda in GH issue
… ontology discussions taking place on mailinglist
McCool: APA call, https://
… Jan 27, 9am ET
… re-use PlugFest slot
… please label issues with "accessibility" accordingly
McCool: Microsoft DTDL, open topic
… still need to find proper slot
Lagally: Ought to restart discussions
McCool: Could aim for February
McCool: Publication follow-up
Kaz: created 5 PRs
... Architecture: https://
... TD: https://
... Discovery: https://
... Profile: https://
... Scripting API: https://
Kaz: small fixes, should be merged in the each TF call
Virtual F2F Planning
McCool: Talked about Pune but because of Covid we will not have any F2F
… hence will be virtual
… proposal
… Plugfest: March 1-5, 9am (?) ET
… Virtual F2F: March 15-26, 8-11am (?) ET
… Need a doodle to finalize
McCool: Other alignments
… should have solid drafts till then
… in June 2021: F2F and PlugFest
… in PF slot we should talk about possible themes/topics
McCool: Kaz, can you setup Doodles?
Kaz: OK
McCool: should have main call, avoiding others call
McCool: Known conflicts?
-> none heard
Action: kaz to generate doodle for March vF2F
Liaisons
McCool: IETF/ASDF/T2TRG
McCool: calls set already?
Koster: Not sure, Ari just came back
McCool: OPC-UA ?
Sebastian: looked into validation
… using SHACL
… compare with OPC-UA approach
… not sure if the group we are in contact with is the *right* group
… addressing OPC-UA bindings ... joint discussions to follow
McCool: meeting scheduled?
Sebastian: no appointment in my calendar yet
… will check
McCool: ITU-T SG20
Lagally: in 2 weeks we will discuss topic in use-case call
McCool: 26th?
Lagally: Yes
TF Reports
Daniel: validation for *partial* TD like Thing Model, fragment TD, Discovery, ...
Lagally: terminology for partial TD
… need definition..
Daniel: Yes, difficult to draw a line among them.
Daniel: kind of lost about how to define/validate them
Lagally: should discuss it during the Architecture call tomorrow, Jan 14
… you can say our specific partial TD could be validated by JSON Schema
… is that right?
<dape> McCool: propose moving it to acrh call
McCool: we should discuss it during the TD/Arch calls
McCool: Security
… discussed 2 issues
… 1. post from external person, issue #197
… formulated response
… got response, did not have time to look at it
… relates to architecture also
Lagally: does hspaay propose a way to solve the issue?
McCool: mentions that we require all being server
… it is not correct. Explained it. Will try to invite hime to call..
McCool: 2. topic: API key and PSK key missing descriptions
… another issue popped up, ID for Philips hue is in URL
… we do not support this yet
… URI template?
… try to resolve it soon
Ege: Will talk about it in TD call
McCool: Discovery call
Kaz: Skimmed existing issues and PRs
… will talk about resolutions next week
McCool: Marketing
Sebastian: talked about animation video
… final steps
… exchange with Coralie
… waiting for feedback from APA / Josh
… final voice-over is still missing
… quickly talke about new web page (TD content)
Kaz: Asked Josh already
… got response -> will forward that response
McCool: "Getting started" content needs to be improved on web page
… grab examples from Cristiano
McCool: PF/Testing
… defer to PF call
… in 2 weeks we can conflicts
McCool: TD/Bindings
Sebastian: today we will restart work
… e.g. security and Philips Hue
Lagally: Link relation types
… do we plan to explain link relation type
Sebastian: Still lots of work needed
… cannot say whether it is achievable
Lagally: Just initial set?
Sebastian: Do we have an initial list?
<kaz> Discovery minutes item 7
Lagally: Yes, but might need further work
Kaz: Talked about it in discovery call as well
… Farshid is planning to work on proposal, and we'll see what type would fit best based on that proposal.
McCool: need to assemble all requirements popping up in different places
Lagally: We have input from use-cases document as a starting point
Sebastian: TD spec mentions we plan to work on it
McCool: Use-cases
Lagally: Call yesterday
… newcomers from building and AR
… re-factored all uses from architecture
… publish by May?
… draft by March
Lagally: Architecture
… no call this week yet
… tomorrow we will have call (one hour only)
… terminology will be discussed
AOB
McCool: AOB?
Kaz: Perey invited expert status?
McCool: geospatial expert
Kaz: let's talk about it in chairs call
McCool: adjourned
McCool: PF in 9 minutes